Feasible and Effective Language Intervention Strategies that Accelerate Students' Academic Achievement

Elizabeth Kelley; Trina D. Spencer

doi:10.1055/s-0041-1723839

Seminars in Speech and Language, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Semin Speech Lang 2021; 42(02): 101-116
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723839

Review Article

Feasible and Effective Language Intervention Strategies that Accelerate Students' Academic Achievement

Elizabeth Kelley

¹Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri

,

Trina D. Spencer

²Department of Child and Family Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) who work in schools are responsible for delivering intervention that improves language abilities but has an impact on academic outcomes. To accomplish this, SLPs need feasible and effective strategies that can be readily incorporated into clinical practice. In this article, we describe two ways that SLPs can deliver intervention that can improve language abilities and academic outcomes: choosing academic language targets and providing language intervention contextualized in the academic curriculum.

Keywords

academic language - intervention - speech-language pathology - education

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). d34 CFR §300.39 (b)(3). 2004
2 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Roles and Responsibilities of Speech-Language Pathologists in Schools [Position Statement]. Accessed January 5, 2021 at: www.asha.org/policy 2010
3 Pace A, Alper R, Burchinal MR, Golinkoff RM, Hirsh-Pasek K. Measuring success: within and cross-domain predictors of academic and social trajectories in elementary school. Early Child Res Q 2019; 46: 112-125
4 Catts HW, Adlof SM, Ellis Weismer S. Language deficits in poor comprehenders: a case for the simple view of reading. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2006; 49 (02) 278-293
5 Alt M, Arizmendi GD, Beal CR. The relationship between mathematics and language: academic implications for children with specific language impairment and English language learners. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2014; 45 (03) 220-233
6 Curran M. Complex sentences in an elementary science curriculum: a research note. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2020; 51 (02) 329-335
7 National Governors Association Center for Best Practices Council of Chief State School Officers. Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State Schools Officers; 2010
8 Baker S, Lesaux N, Jayanthi M. et al. Teaching Academic Content and Literacy to English Learners in Elementary and Middle School. IES Practice Guide. NCEE 2014–4012. What Works Clearinghouse. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE); 2014
9 Foorman B, Beyler N, Borradaile K. et al. Foundational Skills to Support Reading for Understanding in Kindergarten through 3rd Grade. Educator's Practice Guide. NCEE 2016–4008. In: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE) IoES, U.S. Department of Education. ed. What Works Clearinghouse. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education; 2016
10 Tomblin JB, Zhang X, Buckwalter P, Catts H. The association of reading disability, behavioral disorders, and language impairment among second-grade children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2000; 41 (04) 473-482
11 Skibbe LE, Grimm KJ, Stanton-Chapman TL, Justice LM, Pence KL, Bowles RP. Reading trajectories of children with language difficulties from preschool through fifth grade. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2008; 39 (04) 475-486
12 Young AR, Beitchman JH, Johnson C. et al. Young adult academic outcomes in a longitudinal sample of early identified language impaired and control children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2002; 43 (05) 635-645
13 Justice LM, Schmitt MB, Murphy KA, Pratt A, Biancone T. The ‘robustness’ of vocabulary intervention in the public schools: targets and techniques employed in speech-language therapy. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2014; 49 (03) 288-303
14 Finestack LH, Satterlund KE. Current practice of child grammar intervention: a survey of speech-language pathologists. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2018; 27 (04) 1329-1351
15 Diehm E. Writing measurable and academically relevant IEP goals with 80% accuracy over three consecutive trials. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups 2017; 2: 34-44
16 van Kleeck A. Distinguishing between casual talk and academic talk beginning in the preschool years: an important consideration for speech-language pathologists. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2014; 23 (04) 724-741
17 Snow C, Uccelli P. A research agenda for educational linguistics. In: Spolsky B, Hult FM. eds. The Handbook of Educational Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2008: 112-133
18 Wood CL, Schatschneider C, VelDink A. The relation between academic word use and reading comprehension for students from diverse backgrounds. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2020; ; (epub ahead of print)
19 Snow CE. Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science 2010; 328 (5977): 450-452
20 Purpura DJ, Logan JAR, Hassinger-Das B, Napoli AR. Why do early mathematics skills predict later reading? The role of mathematical language. Dev Psychol 2017; 53 (09) 1633-1642
21 Uccelli P, Galloway EP, Barr CD, Meneses A, Dobbs CL. Beyond vocabulary: exploring cross-disciplinary academic-language proficiency and its association with reading comprehension. Read Res Q 2015; 50: 337-356
22 Vukovic RK, Lesaux NK. The language of mathematics: investigating the ways language counts for children's mathematical development. J Exp Child Psychol 2013; 115 (02) 227-244
23 Kim Y-SG, Park C, Park Y. Dimensions of discourse level oral language skills and their relation to reading comprehension and written composition: an exploratory study. Read Writ 2015; 28: 633-654
24 Powell S, Driver MK. The influence of mathematics vocabulary instruction embedded within addition tutoring for first-grade students with mathematics difficulty. Learn Disabil Q 2015; 38: 221-233
25 Wright T, Gotwals AW. Supporting kindergartners' science talk in the context of an integrated science and disciplinary literacy curriculum. Elem Sch J 2017; 117: 513-537
26 Townsend D, Bear D, Templeton S, Burton A. The implications of adolescents' academic word knowledge for achievement and instruction. Read Psychol 2016; 37: 1119-1148
27 Phillips Galloway E, Uccelli P. Examining developmental relations between core academic language skills and reading comprehension for English learners and their peers. J Educ Psychol 2019; 111: 15-31
28 Schleppegrell MJ. Academic language in teaching and learning: introduction to the special issue. Elem Sch J 2012; 112: 409-418
29 Anstrom K, DiCerbo P, Butler F, Katz A, Millet J, Rivera C. A review of the literature on academic English: implications for K-12 English language learners. Arlington, VA: The George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education; 2010
30 Nagy W, Townsend D. Words as tools: learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Read Res Q 2012; 47: 91-108
31 Snow CE, Uccelli P. The challenge of academic language. In: Olson DR, Torrance N. eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. 112. 133
32 National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Science. National Assessment of Educational Progress: An Overview of NAEP. Washington, DC: 2019
33 Lazar R, Warr-Leeper G, Nicholson C, Johnson S. Elementary school teachers' use of multiple meaning expressions. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 1989; 20: 420-430
34 Hollo A, Wehby JH. Teacher talk in general and special education elementary classrooms. Elem Sch J 2017; 117: 616-641
35 Hieber EH, Lubliner S. The nature, learning, and instruction of general academic vocabulary. In: Farstrup AE, Samuels SJ. eds. What Research Has to Say About Vocabulary Instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association; 2008: 106-129
36 Beck I, McKeown M, Kucan L. Bringing Words to Life: Robust Vocabulary Instruction. New York: Guilford Press; 2013
37 National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers (CoCSSO). Common Core State Standards. 2010
38 Hirsch E. Building knowledge. Am Educ 2006; 30: 8-51
39 Kim JS, Burkhauser MA, Mesite LM. et al. Improving reading comprehension, science domain knowledge, and reading engagement through a first-grade content literacy intervention. J Educ Psychol 2020; 113 (01) 3-26
40 Quinn JM, Wagner RK, Petscher Y, Roberts G, Menzel AJ, Schatschneider C. Differential codevelopment of vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension for students with and without learning disabilities. J Educ Psychol 2020; 112 (03) 608-627
41 Cabell SQ, Hwang H. Building content knowledge to boost comprehension in the primary grades. Read Res Q 2020; 55: S99-S107
42 Kendeou P, Walsh EK, Smith ER, O'Brien EJ. Knowledge revision processes in refutation texts. Discourse Process 2014; 51: 374-397
43 Elleman AM, Compton DL. Beyond comprehension strategy instruction: What's next?. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2017; 48 (02) 84-91
44 Compton D, Miller AC, Gilbert J, Steacy LM. What can be learned about the reading comprehension of poor readers through the use of advanced statistical modeling techniques?. In: MIller B, Cutting L, McCardle P. eds. Unraveling Reading Comprehension: Behavioral, Neurobiological, and Genetic Components. Baltimore, MD: Brookes; 2013: 135-147
45 Pullen PC, Tuckwiller ED, Konold TR, Maynard KL, Coyne MD. A tiered intervention model for early vocabulary instruction: the effects of tiered instruction for young students at risk for reading disability. Learn Disabil Res Pract 2010; 25: 110-123
46 McKeown MG. Effective vocabulary instruction fosters knowing words, using words, and understanding how words work. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2019; 50 (04) 466-476
47 Scott J, Nagy W. Developing word consciousness. In: Baumann JF, Kame'enui E. eds. Vocabulary Instruction: Research to Practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2004: 201-217
48 Hogan T, Bridges MS, Justice LM, Cain K. Increasing higher level language skills to improve reading comprehension. Focus Except Child 2011; 44: 1-20
49 Peterson AK, Fox CB, Israelsen M. A systematic review of academic discourse interventions for school-aged children with language-related learning disabilities. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2020; 51 (03) 866-881
50 Anderson RC, Pearson PD. A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In: Pearson PD. ed. Handbook of Reading Research. Taylor and Francis; 1984. ;1: 255-291
51 Mandler JM. On the psychological reality of story structure. Discourse Process 1987; 10: 1-29
52 Gersten R, Fuchs LS, Williams JP, Baker S. Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: a review of research. Rev Educ Res 2001; 71: 279-320
53 McCabe A, Bliss L, Barra G, Bennett M. Comparison of personal versus fictional narratives of children with language impairment. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2008; 17 (02) 194-206
54 Westby C, Culatta B. Telling tales: personal event narratives and life stories. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2016; 47 (04) 260-282
55 Merritt DD, Liles BZ. Story grammar ability in children with and without language disorder: story generation, story retelling, and story comprehension. J Speech Hear Res 1987; 30 (04) 539-552
56 Stetter ME, Hughes MT. Using story grammar to assist students with learning disabilities and reading difficulties improve their comprehension. Educ Treat Child 2010; 33: 115-151
57 Petersen DB, Spencer TD, Konishi A, Sellars TP, Foster ME, Robertson D. Using parallel, narrative-based measures to examine the relationship between listening and reading comprehension: a pilot study. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2020; 51 (04) 1097-1111
58 Spencer TD, Petersen DB. Bridging oral and written language: an oral narrative language intervention study with writing outcomes. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2018; 49 (03) 569-581
59 Favot K, Carter M, Stephenson J. The effects of oral narrative intervention on the narratives of children with language disorder: a systematic literature review. J Dev Phys Disabil 2020; 1-48
60 Spencer TD, Petersen DB. Narrative intervention: principles to practice. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2020; 51 (04) 1081-1096
61 Stein NL, Glenn CG. An analysis of story comprehension in elementary children. In: Freedle RO. ed. New Directions in Discourse Processing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1979
62 Shanahan T, Callison K, Carriere C. et al. Improving reading comprehension in kindergarten through 3rd grade: A practice guide (NCEE 2010–4038). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Science, U.S. Department of Education; 2010. . Accessed January 5, 2021 at: whatworks.ed.gov/publications/practiceguides
63 Meyer BJF, Freedle RO. Effects of discourse type on recall. Am Educ Res J 1984; 21: 121-143
64 Williams JP, Nubla-Kung AM, Pollini S, Stafford KB, Garcia A, Snyder AE. Teaching cause-effect text structure through social studies content to at-risk second graders. J Learn Disabil 2007; 40 (02) 111-120
65 Hebert M, Bohaty JJ, Nelson JR, Lambert MC. Identifying and discriminating expository text structures: an experiment with 4th and 5th grade struggling readers. Read Writ 2018; 31: 2115-2145
66 Pyle N, Ariana VC. , Lignugaris/Kraft B, et al. Effects of expository text structure interventions on comprehension: a meta-analysis. Read Res Q 2017; 52: 469-501
67 Hebert M, Bohaty JJ, Nelson JR, Brown J. The effects of text structure instruction on expository reading comprehension: a meta-analysis. J Educ Psychol 2016; 108: 609
68 Williams JP, Pollini S, Nubla-Kung AM. et al. An intervention to improve comprehension of cause/effect through expository text structure instruction. J Educ Psychol 2014; 106: 1
69 Owen AJ, Leonard LB. The production of finite and nonfinite complement clauses by children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2006; 49 (03) 548-571
70 Schuele CM, Tolbert L. Omissions of obligatory relative markers in children with specific language impairment. Clin Linguist Phon 2001; 15: 257-274
71 Justice L, Ezell H. The Syntax Handbook: Everything You Learned About Syntax, But Forgot. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2016
72 Colozzo P, Gillam RB, Wood M, Schnell RD, Johnston JR. Content and form in the narratives of children with specific language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2011; 54 (06) 1609-1627
73 Spencer TD, Kajian M, Petersen DB, Bilyk N. Effects of an individualized narrative intervention on children's storytelling and comprehension skills. J Early Interv 2013; 35: 243-269
74 Curran M, Owen Van Horne A. Use of recast intervention to teach causal adverbials to young children with developmental language disorder within a science curriculum: a single case design study. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2019; 28 (02) 430-447
75 Eisenberg SL, Ukrainetz TA, Hsu JR, Kaderavek JN, Justice LM, Gillam RB. Noun phrase elaboration in children's spoken stories. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2008; 39 (02) 145-157
76 Saddler B, Graham S. The effects of peer-assisted sentence-combining instruction on the writing performance of more and less skilled young writers. J Educ Psychol 2005; 97: 43-54
77 Nelson N, Van Meter AM. The writing lab approach for building language, literacy, and communication abilities. In: McCauley R, Fey M. eds. Treatment of Language Disorders in Children: Conventional and Controversial Interventions. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 2006: 383-421
78 Scott CM, Nelson NW. Sentence combining: assessment and intervention applications. Perspect Lang Learn Educ 2009; 16: 14-20
79 Kirk C, Gillon GT. Integrated morphological awareness intervention as a tool for improving literacy. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2009; 40 (03) 341-351
80 Nagy W, Berninger VW, Abbott RD. Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. J Educ Psychol 2006; 98: 134-147
81 Foorman BR, Petscher Y, Bishop MD. The incremental variance of morphological knowledge to reading comprehension in grades 3–10 beyond prior reading comprehension, spelling, and text reading efficiency. Learn Individ Differ 2012; 22: 792-798
82 Goodwin AP, Ahn S. A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: effects on literacy outcomes for school-age children. Sci Stud Read 2013; 17: 257-285
83 Nagy WE, Carlisle JF, Goodwin AP. Morphological knowledge and literacy acquisition. J Learn Disabil 2014; 47 (01) 3-12
84 Carlisle JF. Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: an integrative review. Read Res Q 2010; 45: 464-487
85 Goodwin AP, Ahn S. A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Ann Dyslexia 2010; 60 (02) 183-208
86 Apel K, Diehm E. Morphological awareness intervention with kindergartners and first and second grade students from low SES homes: a small efficacy study. J Learn Disabil 2014; 47 (01) 65-75
87 Murphy KA, Diehm EA. Collecting words: a clinical example of a morphology-focused orthographic intervention. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2020; 51 (03) 544-560
88 Cain K, Oakhill JV. Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Read Writ 1999; 11: 489-503
89 Lynch JS, van den Broek P. Understanding the glue of narrative structure: children's on-and off-line inferences about characters' goals. Cogn Dev 2007; 22: 323-340
90 van Kleeck A. Providing preschool foundations for later reading comprehension: the importance of and ideas for targeting inferencing in storybook-sharing interventions. Psychol Sch 2008; 45: 627-643
91 Daugaard HT, Cain K, Elbro C. From words to text: inference making mediates the role of vocabulary in children's reading comprehension. Read Writ 2017; 30: 1773-1788
92 Hall C. Inference instruction for struggling readers: a synthesis of intervention research. Educ Psychol Rev 2015; 28 (01) 1-22
93 Elleman AM. Examining the impact of inference instruction on the literal and inferential comprehension of skilled and less skilled readers: a meta-analytic review. J Educ Psychol 2017; 109: 761
94 Barth AE, Elleman A. Evaluating the impact of a multistrategy inference intervention for middle-grade struggling readers. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2017; 48 (01) 31-41
95 van Kleeck A, Vander Woude J, Hammett L. Fostering literal and inferential language skills in Head Start preschoolers with language impairment using scripted book-sharing discussions. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2006; 15 (01) 85-95
96 Desmarais C, Nadeau L, Trudeau N, Filiatrault-Veilleux P, Maxès-Fournier C. Intervention for improving comprehension in 4-6 year old children with specific language impairment: practicing inferencing is a good thing. Clin Linguist Phon 2013; 27 (6-7): 540-552
97 Gillam SL, Gillam RB, Reece K. Language outcomes of contextualized and decontextualized language intervention: results of an early efficacy study. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2012; 43 (03) 276-291
98 Spencer TD, Moran M, Thompson MS, Petersen DB, Restrepo MA. Early efficacy of multitiered dual-language instruction: promoting preschoolers' Spanish and English oral language. AERA Open 2020; 6: 1-16
99 Justice LM, Mashburn A, Pence KL, Wiggins A. Experimental evaluation of a preschool language curriculum: influence on children's expressive language skills. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51 (04) 983-1001
100 Ukrainetz TA. Contextualized Language intervention. Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications; 2006
101 Staskowski M, Rivera EA. Speech–language pathologists' involvement in responsiveness to intervention activities: a complement to curriculum-relevant practice. Top Lang Disord 2005; 25: 132-147
102 Nelson NW. Curriculum-based language assessment and intervention. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 1989; 20: 170-184
103 Powell RK. Unique contributors to the curriculum: from research to practice for speech-language pathologists in schools. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2018; 49 (02) 140-147
104 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2020 Schools survey. Survey Summary Report: Numbers and Types of Responses, SLPs. Accessed January 5, 2021 at: www.asha.org 2020
105 Gillam RB, Ukrainetz T. Language intervention through literature-based units. In: Ukrainetz TM. ed. Literate Language Intervention: Scaffolding preK-12 Literacy Achievement. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2006: 59-94
106 Whitmire K. The evolution of school-based speech-language services: a half century of change and a new century of practice. Comm Disord Q 2002; 23: 68-76
107 Kamhi AG. Improving clinical practices for children with language and learning disorders. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2014; 45 (02) 92-103
108 Bada SO, Olusegun S. Constructivism learning theory: a paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education 2015; 5: 66-70
109 Miller L. Classroom-based language intervention. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 1989; 20: 153-169
110 Rice ML, Oetting JB, Marquis J, Bode J, Pae S. Frequency of input effects on word comprehension of children with specific language impairment. J Speech Hear Res 1994; 37 (01) 106-122
111 Storkel HL, Voelmle K, Fierro V, Flake K, Fleming KK, Romine RS. Interactive book reading to accelerate word learning by kindergarten children with specific language impairment: Identifying an adequate intensity and variation in treatment response. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2017; 48 (01) 16-30
112 Pfeiffer DL, Pavelko SL, Hahs-Vaughn DL, Dudding CC. A national survey of speech-language pathologists' engagement in interprofessional collaborative practice in schools: identifying predictive factors and barriers to implementation. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2019; 50 (04) 639-655
113 Katakowski D, Frank M. Shift to workload model shows enhanced learning, reduced referrals. ASHA Leader Live, August-September 2020. Accessed January 5, 2021 at: https://leader.pubs.asha.org/do/10.1044/leader.SCM.25082020.36/full/
114 Archibald LM. SLP-educator classroom collaboration: a review to inform reason-based practice. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments 2017; 2: 1-17
115 Kaufman S, Prelock P, Weiler E, Creaghead N, Donnelly C. Metapragmatic awareness of explanation adequacy: developing skills for academic success from a collaborative communication skills unit. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 1994; 25: 174-180
116 Throneburg RJ, Calvert LK, Sturm JJ, Paramboukas AA, Paul PJ. A comparison of service delivery models: effects on curricular vocabulary skills in the school setting. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2000; 9: 10-20
117 Ehren BJ. Maintaining a therapeutic focus and sharing responsibility for student success: keys to in-classroom speech-language services. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2000; 31 (03) 219-229