An Examination of Asymmetry in Adult Tympanometric Measures

Abstract

Background During audiologic evaluations, an examination of interaural asymmetry is commonly evaluated. To date, however, interaural differences for tympanometric indices have not been reported for adults. Without documented tympanometric right-left differences, one cannot determine if asymmetries are normal or are indicative of significant clinical asymmetries.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate interaural asymmetries in peak compensated static acoustic admittance (Y_tm), equivalent ear canal volume (V_ea), tympanometric peak pressure (TPP), and tympanometric width (TW) in normal adults.

Research Design Descriptive, correlational, and inferential measures designs were employed.

Study Sample Participants were 188 otologically normal Caucasian young adults (i.e., 77 females and 111 males; M = 23.0 years, standard deviation [SD] = 2.7, range = 18–30 years).

Data Collection and Analyses Y_tm, V_ea, TPP, and TW measures were obtained bilaterally from an admittance tympanogram using a 226 Hz probe tone. Separate two-factor mixed measures analysis of variance examined the effect of ear and sex for each tympanometric index. Correlation analyses examined the association between right and left ear indices. Interaural differences in tympanometric indices were examined with independent t-tests. Critical differences, for deciding if two tympanometric indices are different between ears, were computed from the standard deviations of the right–left ear difference for statistical confidence levels of 85, 90, 95, and 99%.

Results The effect of ear was not statistically significant (p > 0.05) on any tympanometric index. Females had significantly lower Y_tm and smaller V_ea measures than males (p < 0.05). Correlations between all right and left tympanometric indices were positive and statistically significant (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in interaural differences for any of the tympanometric indices as a function of sex (p > 0.05). Critical differences, for confidence levels for 85% to 99% confidence ranged from ± 0.20–0.36 mmhos for Y_tm, ± 0.23–0.41 cm³ for V_ea, ± 11.1–19.8 daPa for TPP, and ± 27.2–48.7 daPa for TW.

Conclusion A clinician can use these critical differences to determine if tympanometric index interaural differences in ears of young normal Caucasian adults are statistically significant.

Keywords

tympanometry - static acoustic admittance - ear canal volume - peak pressure - tympanometric width

Note

This study was presented in part on November 22, 2019 at the 2019 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Annual Convention, Orlando, FL.

Publication History

Received: 10 May 2020

Accepted: 28 September 2020

Article published online:
25 May 2021

• References

• 1 Margolis RH, Saly GL. Asymmetric hearing loss: definition, validation, and prevalence. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29 (04) 422-431
• 2 Martin JS, Gibson KY, Huston LC. Dichotic listening performance in young adults using low-pass filtered speech. J Am Acad Audiol 2012; 23 (03) 192-205
• 3 Bauch CD, Olsen WO. Wave V interaural latency differences as a function of asymmetry in 2,000–4,000 Hz hearing sensitivity. Am J Otol 1989; 10 (05) 389-392
• 4 van Tilburg MJ, Herrmann BS, Guinan Jr JJ, Rauch SD. Serial cVEMP testing is sensitive to disease progression in Meniere patients. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37 (10) 1614-1619
• 5 Jerger J, Jerger S, Mauldin L. Studies in impedance audiometry. I. Normal and sensorineural ears. Arch Otolaryngol 1972; 96 (06) 513-523
• 6 Margolis RH, Smith P. Tympanometric asymmetry. J Speech Hear Res 1977; 20 (03) 437-446
• 7 Margolis RH, Heller JW. Screening tympanometry: criteria for medical referral. Audiology 1987; 26 (04) 197-208
• 8 Wiley TL, Oviatt DL, Block MG. Acoustic-immittance measures in normal ears. J Speech Hear Res 1987; 30 (02) 161-170
• 9 Roup CM, Wiley TL, Safady SH, Stoppenbach DT. Tympanometric screening norms for adults. Am J Audiol 1998; 7 (02) 55-60
• 10 Margolis RH, Goycoolea HG. Multifrequency tympanometry in normal adults. Ear Hear 1993; 14 (06) 408-413
• 11 Wiley TL, Cruickshanks KJ, Nondahl DM, Tweed TS, Klein R, Klein BE. Tympanometric measures in older adults. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7 (04) 260-268
• 12 Wan IK, Wong LL. Tympanometric norms for Chinese young adults. Ear Hear 2002; 23 (05) 416-421
• 13 Shahnaz N, Davies D. Standard and multifrequency tympanometric norms for Caucasian and Chinese young adults. Ear Hear 2006; 27 (01) 75-90
• 14 Golding M, Doyle K, Sindhusake D, Mitchell P, Newall P, Hartley D. Tympanometric and acoustic stapedius reflex measures in older adults: the Blue Mountains Hearing Study. J Am Acad Audiol 2007; 18 (05) 391-403
• 15 Lidén G. The scope and application of current audiometric tests. J Laryngol Otol 1969; 83 (06) 507-520
• 16 Jerger J. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol 1970; 92 (04) 311-324
• 17 Feldman AS. Tympanometry: application and interpretation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1976; 85 (2, Suppl 25 Pt 2): 202-208
• 18 Hunter LL, Sanford CA. Tympanometry and wideband acoustic immittance. In: Katz J, Chasin M, English KM, Hood LJ, Tillery KL. eds. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. 7th edition.. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015: 137-163
• 19 American National Standards Institute. Specification for Audiometers. (ANSI S3.6–2010). New York, NY: ANSI; 2010
• 20 American National Standards Institute. Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms. (ANSI S3.1–1999, R2018). New York, NY: ANSI; 2018
• 21 Cohen JF, Korevaar DA, Altman DG. et al. STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration. BMJ Open 2016; 6 (11) e012799