Comparison between Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Assessments of the Fetal Corpus Callosum: Reproducibility of Measurements and Acquisition Time

Abstract

The objective of this article was to study the reproducibility and reliability of the fetal corpus callosum measurements between two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) acquisitions. This prospective study enrolled 475 fetuses, monitored between 18 and 38 weeks of gestation by two operators. Starting from a transcerebellar axial plane, 3D and 2D mid-sagittal views of the corpus callosum were obtained. Measurements of length and thickness were performed and underwent quality control by independent reviewers. The acquisition time of the two methods was measured. Means, differences, and linear correlations were analyzed using t-test, regression and Pearson's correlation coefficients, and Bland–Altman's plots. This analysis was performed for each operator to test the interobserver reproducibility. Among the 432 cases measured using both methods, 380 (88%) were validated by quality control. The mean corpus callosum length and thickness were essentially the same using 2D and 3D measurements (2D: 33.8 ± 8.7 vs. 3D: 33.7 ± 8.7 mm, 2D: 2.2 ± 0.4 vs. 3D: 2.2 ± 0.4 mm, respectively; mean ± standard deviation [SD]). Linear regression coefficients and Pearson's coefficients were similar for length (2D: 0.8283 and 0.9191 vs. 3D: 0.8271 and 0.9095), but slightly different regarding thickness (2D: 0.6775 and 0.8231 vs. 3D: 0.5831 and 0.7636). Differences between 2D and 3D measurements, considering Bland–Altman's plots and correlated with gestational age, were acceptable (2D: 0.097 ± 0.559 mm, 3D: 0.004 ± 0.111 mm). The acquisition time required was significantly lower for 3D acquisitions (3D: 25.2 ± 14.5 seconds vs. 2D: 35.1 ± 19.4 seconds, p < 0.01). Linear regression and Pearson's coefficients for the measurements of corpus callosum length and thickness using 2D or 3D acquisitions did not differ between the operators. This study confirmed good reproducibility of corpus callosum assessment by transabdominal 3D acquisitions. The good feasibility in routine scans may lead to better screening for callosal dysgenesis.

Keywords

corpus callosum - 3D ultrasound - screening - neurosonography - callosal dysgenesis

^* These are the first coauthors who contributed equally to this study.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 07. Oktober 2020

Angenommen: 15. Dezember 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
11. Februar 2021

• References

• 1 Habas PA, Kim K, Rousseau F, Glenn OA, Barkovich AJ, Studholme C. Atlas-based segmentation of developing tissues in the human brain with quantitative validation in young fetuses. Hum Brain Mapp 2010; 31 (09) 1348-1358
• 2 Monteagudo A, Reuss ML, Timor-Tritsch IE. Imaging the fetal brain in the second and third trimesters using transvaginal sonography. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77 (01) 27-32
• 3 Pashaj S, Merz E, Wellek S. Biometry of the fetal corpus callosum by three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42 (06) 691-698
• 4 Hanna RM, Marsh SE, Swistun D. et al. Distinguishing 3 classes of corpus callosal abnormalities in consanguineous families. Neurology 2011; 76 (04) 373-382
• 5 Craven I, Bradburn MJ, Griffiths PD. Antenatal diagnosis of agenesis of the corpus callosum. Clin Radiol 2015; 70 (03) 248-253
• 6 Paupe A, Bidat L, Sonigo P, Lenclen R, Molho M, Ville Y. Prenatal diagnosis of hypoplasia of the corpus callosum in association with non-ketotic hyperglycinemia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20 (06) 616-619
• 7 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Education Committee. Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the ‘basic examination’ and the ‘fetal neurosonogram.’. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29 (01) 109-116
• 8 Merz E, Abramowicz JS. 3D/4D ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis: is it time for routine use?. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2012; 55 (01) 336-351
• 9 Bornstein E, Monteagudo A, Santos R. et al. A systematic technique using 3-dimensional ultrasound provides a simple and reproducible mode to evaluate the corpus callosum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202 (02) 201.e1-201.e5
• 10 Tonni G, Grisolia G, Sepulveda W. Second trimester fetal neurosonography: reconstructing cerebral midline anatomy and anomalies using a novel three-dimensional ultrasound technique. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34 (01) 75-83
• 11 French College of Fetal Ultrasound (CFEF). , guidelines for ultrasound screening during Zika epidemic (2016). Available at: https://www.cfef.org/archives/zika/16_02_Kit_d_aide_en_10_diapos_Vdef_2-shrunk.pdf
• 12 Papageorghiou AT. Fetal assessment after Zika exposure. BJOG 2016; 123 (08) 1271
• 13 Achiron R, Achiron A. Development of the human fetal corpus callosum: a high-resolution, cross-sectional sonographic study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18 (04) 343-347
• 14 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1 (8476): 307-310
• 15 Muscatello A, Accurti V, Conte V. et al. Comparison between two- and three-dimensional ultrasound in visualization of corpus callosum during second trimester routine scan: our experience. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013; 33 (03) 201-202
• 16 Miguelote RF, Vides B, Santos RF, Palha JA, Matias A, Sousa N. The role of three-dimensional imaging reconstruction to measure the corpus callosum: comparison with direct mid-sagittal views. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31 (09) 875-880
• 17 Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22 (01) 85-93
• 18 Plasencia W, Dagklis T, Borenstein M, Csapo B, Nicolaides KH. Assessment of the corpus callosum at 20-24 weeks' gestation by three-dimensional ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30 (02) 169-172
• 19 Cignini P, Padula F, Giorlandino M. et al. Reference charts for fetal corpus callosum length: a prospective cross-sectional study of 2950 fetuses. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33 (06) 1065-1078
• 20 Hofman J, Hutny M, Sztuba K, Paprocka J. Corpus callosum agenesis: an insight into the etiology and spectrum of symptoms. Brain Sci 2020; 10 (09) 10
• 21 Lord J, McMullan DJ, Eberhardt RY. et al; Prenatal Assessment of Genomes and Exomes Consortium. Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study. Lancet 2019; 393 (10173): 747-757
• 22 Santo S, D'Antonio F, Homfray T. et al. Counseling in fetal medicine: agenesis of the corpus callosum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40 (05) 513-521
• 23 Schupper A, Konen O, Halevy A, Cohen R, Aharoni S, Shuper A. Thick corpus callosum in children. J Clin Neurol 2017; 13 (02) 170-174
• 24 Folliot-Le Doussal L, Chadie A, Brasseur-Daudruy M, Verspyck E, Saugier-Veber P, Marret S. Perinatal Network of Haute-Normandie. Neurodevelopmental outcome in prenatally diagnosed isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum. Early Hum Dev 2018; 116: 9-16