Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2015; 83(12): e17-e22
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-110203
Original Paper
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

A Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) in Outpatients with Depression

Psychometrische Evaluation der deutschen Übersetzung des Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) bei ambulanten depressiven Patienten
A. Roniger
,
C. Späth
,
U. Schweiger
,
J. P. Klein
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 December 2015 (online)

Abstract

Background: The self-rated, 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) is a well-established measure of depression severity. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the German translation of the QIDS-SR16.

Methods: 332 depressed German adults awaiting psychotherapy were assessed with the German translations of the QIDS-SR16, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-24).

Results: Internal consistency for the QIDS-SR16 was acceptable (Cronbach’s alpha = .77). Corrected item-total correlations indicated adequate discriminatory power of all the items. The QIDS-SR16 highly correlated with the BDI-II (r = .810) but only moderately correlated with the HRSD-24 (r = .581). Regarding discriminant validity, the QIDS-SR16 discriminated between patients with and without a depressive episode but not between patients with and without panic disorder.

Conclusion: The German translation of the QIDS-SR16 has adequate psychometric properties. Our results support the usefulness of the German version of the QIDS-SR16 as a brief depression rating scale in clinical and research settings.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Die Selbstbeurteilungsversion des Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) ist ein etabliertes Maß zur Bestimmung der Depressionsschwere. Das Ziel dieser Studie ist es, die psychometrischen Eigenschaften der deutschen Übersetzung des QIDS-SR16 zu beschreiben.

Methoden: 332 depressive deutsche Erwachsene, die auf eine Psychotherapie warteten, wurden untersucht mit den deutschen Übersetzungen des QIDS-SR16, des Beck Depressions Inventar (BDI-II) und der 24-item Version der Hamilton Skala zur Fremdbeurteilung depressiver Symptome (HRSD-24).

Ergebnisse: Die interne Konsistenz des QIDS-SR16 war akzeptabel (Cronbach’s alpha = 0,77). Alle Items wiesen adäquate Trennschärfewerte auf. Der QIDS-SR16 korrelierte hoch mit dem BDI-II (r = 0,810) aber nur mittelgradig mit der HRSD-24 (r = 0.581). Bezogen auf die diskriminante Validität unterschied der QIDS-SR16 zwischen Patienten mit und ohne einer depressiven Episode aber nicht zwischen Patienten mit und ohne einer Panikstörung.

Schlussfolgerung: Die deutsche Übersetzung des QIDS-SR16 hat adäquate psychometrische Eigenschaften. Unsere Ergebnisse zeigen, dass der QIDS-SR16 geeignet ist als kurzes Instrument zur Messung der Depressionsschwere in Klinik und Forschung.

 
  • References

  • 1 Whiteford HA, Degenhardt L, Rehm J et al. Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2013; 382: 1575-1586
  • 2 Plass D, Vos T, Hornberg C et al. Trends in disease burden in Germany—results, implications and limitations of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Dtsch Arztebl International 2014; 111: 629-638
  • 3 DGPPN, BÄK, KBV, AWMF, AkdA, BPtK, DAGSHG, DEGAM, DGPM, DGPs, DGRW (Hrsg) für die Leitliniengruppe Unipolare Depression S3-Leitlinie / Nationale Versorgungsleitlinie Unipolare Depression-Langfassung. Berlin, Düsseldorf: DGPPN, ÄZQ, AWMF; 2009 1 ed. http://www.depression.versorgungsleitlinien.de
  • 4 Rush AJ, Gullion CM, Basco MR et al. The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): psychometric properties. Psychol Med 1996; 26: 477-486
  • 5 Rush AJ, Giles DE, Schlesser MA et al. The Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): preliminary findings. Psychiatry Res 1986; 18: 65-87
  • 6 Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960; 23: 56-62
  • 7 Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Ibrahim HM et al. The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 54: 573-583
  • 8 Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Ibrahim HM et al. The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (IDS-C) and Self-Report (IDS-SR), and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) and Self-Report (QIDS-SR) in public sector patients with mood disorders: a psychometric evaluation. Psychol Med 2004; 34: 73-82
  • 9 Bernstein IH, Rush AJ, Carmody TJ et al. Clinical vs. self-report versions of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology in a public sector sample. J Psychiatr Res 2007; 41: 239-246
  • 10 Bernstein IH, Rush AJ, Trivedi MH et al. Psychometric properties of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology in adolescents. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2010; 19: 185-194
  • 11 Rush AJ, Bernstein IH, Trivedi MH et al. An evaluation of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology and the hamilton rating scale for depression: a sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression trial report. Biol Psychiatry 2006; 59: 493-501
  • 12 Rush AJ, Carmody TJ, Ibrahim HM et al. Comparison of self-report and clinician ratings on two inventories of depressive symptomatology. Psychiatr Serv 2006; 57: 829-837
  • 13 Doraiswamy PM, Bernstein IH, Rush AJ et al. Diagnostic utility of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16 and QIDS-SR16) in the elderly. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2010; 122: 226-234
  • 14 Gili M, Luciano JV, Bauza N et al. Psychometric properties of the IDS-SR30 for the assessment of depressive symptoms in Spanish population. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011; 11: 131
  • 15 Drieling T, Scharer LO, Langosch JM. The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: German translation and psychometric validation. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2007; 16: 230-236
  • 16 Wu D, Yin H, Xu S et al. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): Preliminary findings. Asian J Psychiatr 2010; 3: 126-129
  • 17 Yamamoto N, Kawakami S, Sato K et al. The inter-rater reliability of the Japanese version of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, clinician version. Hum Psychopharmacol 2011; 26: 267-269
  • 18 Yeung A, Feldman G, Pedrelli P et al. The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, clinician rated and self-report: a psychometric assessment in Chinese Americans with major depressive disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 2012; 200: 712-715
  • 19 First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M et al. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders SCID-I. American Psychiatric Pub 1997;
  • 20 Hautzinger M, Keller F, Kühner C. BDI II Beck Depressions-Inventar Revision. Manual. Frankfurt am Main: Harcourt Test Services; 2006
  • 21 Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory – Second Edition. Manual. San Antonia, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1996
  • 22 López-Pina JA, Sánchez-Meca J, López-López JA. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: A meta-analytic reliability generalization study. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology 2009; 9: 143-159
  • 23 Bagby RM, Ryder AG, Schuller RD et al. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: has the gold standard become a lead weight?. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161: 2163-2177
  • 24 Derogatis LR. SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring and procedures manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems; 1994
  • 25 Franke GH. SCL-90-R. Beltz-Test-GmbH 2002;
  • 26 Sijtsma K. On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach's Alpha. Psychometrika 2009; 74: 107-120
  • 27 Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education 2011; 2: 53-55
  • 28 Bühner M. Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion. München: Pearson Studium; 2011
  • 29 Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. 3 ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994
  • 30 Coaley K. An Introduction to psychological assessment and psychometrics. London: Sage; 2009
  • 31 McDowell I. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006
  • 32 Melartin TK, Rytsala HJ, Leskela US et al. Current comorbidity of psychiatric disorders among DSM-IV major depressive disorder patients in psychiatric care in the Vantaa Depression Study. J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63: 126-134