Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37(01): 122-131
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714743
Original Research

Rhinophyma: Combined Surgical Treatment and Quality of Life

Mahmoud Daoud
1   Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Doncaster, United Kingdom
,
Gautham Ullas
2   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust, Whitehaven, Cumbria, United Kingdom
,
Rakesh Kumar
3   Department of Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India
,
Ullas Raghavan
1   Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Doncaster, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Rhinophyma is a progressive and disfiguring thickening of the nasal skin. It is typically found in middle-aged or elderly Caucasian males. The exact cause of the disease is unknown. There is excessive formation of scar-like tissue and hyperplasia of the sebaceous glands. This article will demonstrate our experience of treating rhinophyma using a combined surgical approach and propose a novel classification system. This is a retrospective analysis of cases operated by a single surgeon over 9 years using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) tool. Thirty-three patients were identified. Twenty-nine patients had three techniques used in one sitting, two patients had two techniques used, and two further patients had one technique used. Total GBI showed a +50.99 result following surgery. Rhinophyma treatments can benefit patients as demonstrated by the GBI outcome. This can improve the patients' quality of life. The use of more than one technique in the same sitting potentially improves the outcome. Our classification system helps categorize the disease better as well as choosing the treatment and comparing disease and treatment. The Level of Evidence for the study is 4.

Paper was presented at The British Society of Facial Plastic Surgery annual meeting, The European Academy of Facial Plastic Surgery annual meeting, and The American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.




Publication History

Article published online:
04 September 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Rohrich RJ, Griffin JR, Adams Jr WP. Rhinophyma: review and update. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (03) 860-869, quiz 870
  • 2 Wiemer DR. Rhinophyma. Clin Plast Surg 1987; 14 (02) 357-365
  • 3 Dotz W, Berliner N. Rhinophyma. A master's depiction, a patron's affliction. Am J Dermatopathol 1984; 6 (03) 231-235
  • 4 Ayers Jr S, Mihan R, Marks R, Harcourt-Webster JN. Demodex folliculorum in rosacea. Arch Dermatol 1970; 101 (06) 706-707
  • 5 Thiboutot DM. Acne and rosacea. New and emerging therapies. Dermatol Clin 2000; 18 (01) 63-71, viii
  • 6 Thiboutot D, Harris G, Iles V, Cimis G, Gilliland K, Hagari S. Activity of the type 1 5 alpha-reductase exhibits regional differences in isolated sebaceous glands and whole skin. J Invest Dermatol 1995; 105 (02) 209-214
  • 7 Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG. Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996; 105 (06) 415-422
  • 8 Bogetti P, Boltri M, Spagnoli G, Dolcet M. Surgical treatment of rhinophyma: a comparison of techniques. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2002; 26 (01) 57-60
  • 9 Gupta S, Handa S, Saraswat A, Kumar B. Conventional cold excision combined with dermabrasion for rhinophyma. J Dermatol 2000; 27 (02) 116-120
  • 10 Simo R, Sharma VL. Treatment of rhinophyma with carbon dioxide laser. J Laryngol Otol 1996; 110 (09) 841-846
  • 11 Simo R, Sharma VL. The use of the CO2 laser in rhinophyma surgery: personal technique and experience, complications, and long-term results. Facial Plast Surg 1998; 14 (04) 287-295
  • 12 Madan V, Ferguson JE, August PJ. Carbon dioxide laser treatment of rhinophyma: a review of 124 patients. Br J Dermatol 2009; 161 (04) 814-818
  • 13 Hetherington HE. Coblation-assisted decortication for the treatment of rhinophyma. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (06) 1082-1084
  • 14 Timms M, Roper A, Patrick C. Coblation of rhinophyma. J Laryngol Otol 2011; 125 (07) 724-728
  • 15 Sahin C, Turker M, Celasun B. Giant rhinophyma: Excision with coblation assisted surgery. Indian J Plast Surg 2014; 47 (03) 450-452
  • 16 Rebora A. Rosacea. J Invest Dermatol 1987; 88: 56s
  • 17 Wilkin JK. Rosacea. Pathophysiology and treatment. Arch Dermatol 1994; 130 (03) 359-362
  • 18 el-Azhary RA, Roenigk RK, Wang TD. Spectrum of results after treatment of rhinophyma with the carbon dioxide laser. Mayo Clin Proc 1991; 66 (09) 899-905
  • 19 Freeman BS. Reconstructive rhinoplasty for rhinophyma. Plast Reconstr Surg 1970; 46 (03) 265-270
  • 20 Faris C, Manjaly JG, Ismail-Koch H, Caldera S. Rapid treatment of rhinophyma with powered microdebrider. Case Rep Otolaryngol 2013; 2013: 621639
  • 21 Lazzeri D, Colizzi L, Licata G. et al. Malignancies within rhinophyma: report of three new cases and review of the literature. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36 (02) 396-405
  • 22 Fischer D, Stewart AL, Bloch DA, Lorig K, Laurent D, Holman H. Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure. JAMA 1999; 282 (12) 1157-1162
  • 23 Schwentner I, Schmutzhard J, Deibl M, Sprinzl GM. Health-related quality of life outcome of adult patients after otoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 2006; 17 (04) 629-635