Reconstruction after Mohs Surgery for Digit Melanoma: Description of Techniques and Postoperative Limb Function

Abstract

Introduction Mohs surgery and reconstruction has enabled tissue-preserving resection of cutaneous malignancies. The goal of our case series evaluation is to present reconstructive techniques and functional outcomes in patients undergoing digit-sparing treatment for primary melanoma.

Materials and Methods A chart review was performed to identify consecutive patients undergoing Mohs surgery and reconstruction for melanoma of the digits. Quality of life (QOL) survey was performed to assess function after the procedure.

Results Thirty-two patients (13 hand, 19 foot, Age: 65.03 +/–17.78 years) who were undergoing Mohs surgery were identified. No recurrence was identified with an average follow-up of 16.1 months (1–95 months). The average defect size was 5.79 +/–4.54 cm². Reconstruction was performed 0–4 days after resection. The most common techniques included full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) (N = 7), collagen matrix + FTSG (N = 4), and volar advancement flap (N = 7). The reconstructive technique choice appears correlated with defect size (p = 0.0125). Neuro-QOL upper extremity survey results showed a difference that approached statistical significance between patients who underwent digit-sparing treatment (n = 7) versus direct to amputation controls (n = 5) (p = 0.072). No survey differences between digit-sparing treatment (n = 10) and amputation (n = 8) were identified in the lower extremity (p = 0.61).

Conclusion Our results show digit-sparing treatment can confirm clear surgical margins and a trend toward improvement in upper extremity function compared with immediate amputation.

Keywords

melanoma - digital melanoma - limb function

Publication History

Article published online:
10 August 2020

• References

• 1 Rebecca VW, Sondak VK, Smalley KS. A brief history of melanoma: from mummies to mutations. Melanoma Res 2012; 22 (02) 114-122
• 2 Turner JB, Rinker B. Melanoma of the hand: current practice and new frontiers. Healthcare (Basel) 2014; 2 (01) 125-138
• 3 Knackstedt T, Knackstedt RW, Couto R, Gastman B. Malignant Melanoma: Diagnostic and Management Update. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (02) 202e-216e
• 4 Sladden MJ, Nieweg OE, Howle J, Coventry BJ, Thompson JF. Updated evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of melanoma: definitive excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma. Med J Aust 2018; 208 (03) 137-142
• 5 Cho K, Jung ST. Treatment outcomes of advanced stage malignant melanoma in hand and foot after amputation in Korean patients. Clin Orthop Surg 2013; 5 (04) 314-320
• 6 Heaton KM, el-Naggar A, Ensign LG, Ross MI, Balch CM. Surgical management and prognostic factors in patients with subungual melanoma. Ann Surg 1994; 219 (02) 197-204
• 7 Sinno S, Wilson S, Billig J, Shapiro R, Choi M. Primary melanoma of the hand: An algorithmic approach to surgical management. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2015; 49 (06) 339-345
• 8 Cochran AM, Buchanan PJ, Bueno Jr RA, Neumeister MW. Subungual melanoma: a review of current treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (02) 259-273
• 9 Abide JM, Nahai F, Bennett RG. The meaning of surgical margins. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73 (03) 492-497
• 10 Etzkorn JR, Sobanko JF, Elenitsas R. et al. Low recurrence rates for in situ and invasive melanomas using Mohs micrographic surgery with melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1) immunostaining: tissue processing methodology to optimize pathologic staging and margin assessment. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 72 (05) 840-850
• 11 Terushkin V, Brodland DG, Sharon DJ, Zitelli JA. Digit-sparing Mohs surgery for melanoma. Dermatol Surg 2016; 42 (01) 83-93
• 12 Brodland DG. The treatment of nail apparatus melanoma with Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27 (03) 269-273
• 13 Do AN, Goleno K, Geisse JK. Mohs micrographic surgery and partial amputation preserving function and aesthetics in digits: case reports of invasive melanoma and digital dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Dermatol Surg 2006; 32 (12) 1516-1521
• 14 Gershon RC, Lai JS, Bode R. et al. Neuro-QOL: quality of life item banks for adults with neurological disorders: item development and calibrations based upon clinical and general population testing. Qual Life Res 2012; 21 (03) 475-486
• 15 Benedetto PX, Poblete-Lopez C. Mohs micrographic surgery technique. Dermatol Clin 2011; 29 (02) 141-151
• 16 Etzkorn JR, Sobanko JF, Shin TM. et al. Correlation between appropriate use criteria and the frequency of subclinical spread or reconstruction with a flap or graft for melanomas treated with Mohs surgery with melanoma antigen recognized by T Cells 1 immunostaining. Dermatol Surg 2016; 42 (04) 471-476
• 17 Knackstedt TJ, Baltz JO, Wilmer EN, Jellinek NJ. Assessing patient outcomes after digit-sparing en bloc surgery of nail apparatus melanoma in situ using two validated surveys. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; Doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.053.
• 18 Valentín-Nogueras SM, Brodland DG, Zitelli JA, González-Sepúlveda L, Nazario CM. Mohs micrographic surgery using MART-1 Immunostain in the treatment of invasive melanoma and melanoma in situ. Dermatol Surg 2016; 42 (06) 733-744
• 19 Nosrati A, Berliner JG, Goel S. et al. Outcomes of Melanoma In Situ Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery Compared With Wide Local Excision. JAMA Dermatol 2017; 153 (05) 436-441
• 20 Janis JE, Kwon RK, Attinger CE. The new reconstructive ladder: modifications to the traditional model. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (Suppl 1) 205S-212S
• 21 Yannascoli SM, Thibaudeau S, Levin LS. Management of soft tissue defects of the hand. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (06) 1237-1244
• 22 Jacoby SM, Bachoura A, Chen NC, Shin EK, Katolik LI. One-stage Integra coverage for fingertip injuries. Hand (N Y) 2013; 8 (03) 291-295
• 23 Rueth NM, Cromwell KD, Cormier JN. Long-term follow-up for melanoma patients: is there any evidence of a benefit?. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2015; 24 (02) 359-377