Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714247
Current Position of Sacral Neuromodulation in Treatment of Fecal Incontinence

Abstract
Fecal incontinence (FI) is defined as uncontrolled passage of feces or gas for at least 1-month duration in an individual who previously had control. FI is a common and debilitating condition affecting many individuals. Continence depends on complex relationships between anal sphincters, rectal curvatures, rectoanal sensation, rectal compliance, stool consistency, and neurologic function. Factors, such as pregnancy, chronic diarrhea, diabetes mellitus, previous anorectal surgery, urinary incontinence, smoking, obesity, limited physical activity, white race, and neurologic disease, are known to be the risk factors for FI. Conservative/medical management including biofeedback are recognized as the first-line treatment of the FI. Those who are suitable for surgical intervention and who have failed conservative management, sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has emerged as the treatment of choice in many patients. The surgical technique involves placement of a tined lead with four electrodes through the S3 sacral foramen. The lead is attached to a battery, which acts as a pulse generator, and is placed under the patient's skin in the lower lumbar region. The use of SNS in the treatment of FI has increased over the years and the beneficial effects of this treatment have been substantiated by multiple studies. This review describes SNS as a modality of treatment for FI and its position in the current medical diaspora in patients with FI.
Publication History
Article published online:
28 January 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1
Whitehead WE,
Wald A,
Norton NJ.
Treatment options for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44 (01) 131-142 ,
discussion 142–144
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Hughes BT,
Chepyala P,
Hendon S,
Crowell MD,
Olden KW.
Fecal incontinence in an inpatient population: a not uncommon finding. Dig Dis Sci
2009; 54 (10) 2215-2219
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Whitehead WE,
Borrud L,
Goode PS.
et al; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterology 2009;
137 (02) 512-517 , 517.e1–517.e2
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Nelson RL.
Epidemiology of fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 2004; 126 (01, Suppl 1): S3-S7
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Nevler A.
The epidemiology of anal incontinence and symptom severity scoring. Gastroenterol
Rep (Oxf) 2014; 2 (02) 79-84
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Paquette IM,
Varma MG,
Kaiser AM,
Steele SR,
Rafferty JF.
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' Clinical Practice Guideline for
the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2015; 58 (07) 623-636
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Vaizey CJ,
Carapeti E,
Cahill JA,
Kamm MA.
Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. 1999; 44 (01) 77-80
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Rao SSC.
Manometric evaluation of defecation disorders: part II. Fecal incontinence. Gastroenterologist
1997; 5 (02) 99-111
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Guillaume A,
Salem AE,
Garcia P,
Chander Roland B.
Pathophysiology and therapeutic options for fecal incontinence. J Clin Gastroenterol
2017; 51 (04) 324-330
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Tjandra JJ,
Dykes SL,
Kumar RR.
et al; Standards Practice Task Force of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.
Practice parameters for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;
50 (10) 1497-1507
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Prapasrivorakul S,
Gosselink MP,
Gorissen KJ.
et al.
Sacral neuromodulation for faecal incontinence: is the outcome compromised in patients
with high-grade internal rectal prolapse?. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015; 30 (02) 229-234
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Norton C,
Thomas L,
Hill J.
Management of faecal incontinence in adults: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2007; 334
(7608): 1370-1371
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Hallgren T,
Fasth S,
Delbro DS,
Nordgren S,
Oresland T,
Hultén L.
Loperamide improves anal sphincter function and continence after restorative proctocolectomy.
Dig Dis Sci 1994; 39 (12) 2612-2618
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Heymen S,
Scarlett Y,
Jones K,
Ringel Y,
Drossman D,
Whitehead WE.
Randomized controlled trial shows biofeedback to be superior to pelvic floor exercises
for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52 (10) 1730-1737
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Altomare DF,
De Fazio M,
Giuliani RT,
Catalano G,
Cuccia F.
Sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence in the era of sacral nerve modulation. World
J Gastroenterol 2010; 16 (42) 5267-5271
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Malouf AJ,
Norton CS,
Engel AF,
Nicholls RJ,
Kamm MA.
Long-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma.
Lancet 2000; 355 (9200): 260-265
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Bravo Gutierrez A,
Madoff RD,
Lowry AC,
Parker SC,
Buie WD,
Baxter NN.
Long-term results of anterior sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47 (05) 727-731
, discussion 731–732
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Lombardi G,
Del Popolo G.
Clinical outcome of sacral neuromodulation in incomplete spinal cord injured patients
suffering from neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms. Spinal Cord 2009; 47 (06)
486-491
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Matzel KE,
Stadelmaier U,
Hohenfellner M,
Gall FP.
Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence.
Lancet 1995; 346 (8983): 1124-1127
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Carrington EV,
Evers J,
Grossi U.
et al.
A systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation mechanisms in the treatment of fecal
incontinence and constipation. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26 (09) 1222-1237
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Ratto C,
Litta F,
Parello A,
Donisi L,
Doglietto GB.
Sacral nerve stimulation is a valid approach in fecal incontinence due to sphincter
lesions when compared to sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53 (03) 264-272
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Rodrigues FG,
Chadi SA,
Cracco AJ.
et al.
Faecal incontinence in patients with a sphincter defect: comparison of sphincteroplasty
and sacral nerve stimulation. Colorectal Dis 2017; 19 (05) 456-461
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Hull T,
Giese C,
Wexner SD.
et al; SNS Study Group.
Long-term durability of sacral nerve stimulation therapy for chronic fecal incontinence.
Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (02) 234-245
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Mellgren A,
Wexner SD,
Coller JA.
et al; SNS Study Group.
Long-term efficacy and safety of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence.
Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54 (09) 1065-1075
MissingFormLabel
- 25 2019 Device Approvals | FDA. Medical Devices Cleared or Approved by FDA in 2019.
Accessed January 4, 2020 at: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/recently-approved-devices/2019-device-approvals
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Bharucha AE.
Fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 2003; 124 (06) 1672-1685
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Maeda Y,
Lundby L,
Buntzen S,
Laurberg S.
Outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence at 5 years. Ann Surg 2014;
259 (06) 1126-1131
MissingFormLabel
- 28
George AT,
Kalmar K,
Panarese A,
Dudding TC,
Nicholls RJ,
Vaizey CJ.
Long-term outcomes of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum
2012; 55 (03) 302-306
MissingFormLabel
- 29
Moya P,
Arroyo A,
Lacueva J.
et al.
Sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of severe faecal incontinence: long-term
clinical, manometric and quality of life results. Tech Coloproctol 2014; 18 (02) 179-185
MissingFormLabel
- 30
Matzel KE,
Lux P,
Heuer S,
Besendörfer M,
Zhang W.
Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis
2009; 11 (06) 636-641
MissingFormLabel
- 31
Lim JT,
Hastie IAG,
Hiscock RJ,
Shedda SM.
Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: long-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum
2011; 54 (08) 969-974
MissingFormLabel
- 32
Hollingshead JRF,
Dudding TC,
Vaizey CJ.
Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: results from a single centre over
a 10-year period. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13 (09) 1030-1034
MissingFormLabel
- 33
Vallet C,
Parc Y,
Lupinacci R,
Shields C,
Parc R,
Tiret E.
Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: response rate, satisfaction and
the value of preoperative investigation in patient selection. Colorectal Dis 2010;
12 (03) 247-253
MissingFormLabel
- 34
Duelund-Jakobsen J,
van Wunnik B,
Buntzen S,
Lundby L,
Baeten C,
Laurberg S.
Functional results and patient satisfaction with sacral nerve stimulation for idiopathic
faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14 (06) 753-759
MissingFormLabel
- 35
Altomare DF,
Ratto C,
Ganio E,
Lolli P,
Masin A,
Villani RD.
Long-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum
2009; 52 (01) 11-17
MissingFormLabel
- 36
Uludağ O,
Melenhorst J,
Koch SMP,
van Gemert WG,
Dejong CHC,
Baeten CGMI.
Sacral neuromodulation: long-term outcome and quality of life in patients with faecal
incontinence. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13 (10) 1162-1166
MissingFormLabel
- 37
Altomare DF,
Giuratrabocchetta S,
Knowles CH,
Muñoz Duyos A,
Robert-Yap J,
Matzel KE.
; European SNS Outcome Study Group.
Long-term outcomes of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg
2015; 102 (04) 407-415
MissingFormLabel
- 38
Matzel KE,
Kamm MA,
Stösser M.
et al.
Sacral spinal nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: multicentre study. Lancet
2004; 363 (9417): 1270-1276
MissingFormLabel