Facial Plast Surg 2020; 36(01): 057-065
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701478
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Osteotomies—When, Why, and How?

Garrett D. Locketz
1   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Kirkland N. Lozada
2   Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Penn Medicine Becker ENT, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Daniel G. Becker
2   Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Penn Medicine Becker ENT, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 March 2020 (online)

Abstract

An ideal nasal osteotomy should deliver precise, predictable, and reproducible cosmetic and functional results while minimizing soft-tissue trauma and postoperative complications. In addition to closing an open roof deformity after hump reduction, other common indications for osteotomies include the crooked nose and a wide bony vault. The literature has reported numerous and diverse osteotomy techniques as well as differences in timing of osteotomies. Each has its own merits and indications, and its proponents. In this article, we review the anatomy and nomenclature relating to osteotomies. We review the locations and paths of the osteotomies—lateral, intermediate, medial, and superior/transverse. We consider the percutaneous and endonasal approaches, as well as timing of osteotomies and other considerations. We also discuss technical considerations in the selection of instrumentation for osteotomies.

 
  • References

  • 1 Bloom JD, Immerman SB, Constantinides M. Osteotomies in the crooked nose. Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27 (05) 456-466
  • 2 VanKoevering KK, Rosko AJ, Moyer JS. Osteotomies demystified. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2017; 25 (02) 201-210
  • 3 Gruber RP, Garza RM, Cho GJ. Nasal bone osteotomies with nonpowered tools. Clin Plast Surg 2016; 43 (01) 73-83
  • 4 Most SP, Murakami CS. A modern approach to nasal osteotomies. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2005; 13 (01) 85-92
  • 5 Ozucer B, Özturan O. Current updates in nasal bone reshaping. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 24 (04) 309-315
  • 6 Wayne I. Osteotomies in rhinoplasty surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 21 (04) 379-383
  • 7 Gryskiewicz JM, Gryskiewicz KM. Nasal osteotomies: a clinical comparison of the perforating methods versus the continuous technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (05) 1445-1456 , discussion 1457–1458
  • 8 Lee HM, Kang HJ, Choi JH, Chae SW, Lee SH, Hwang SJ. Rationale for osteotome selection in rhinoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 2002; 116 (12) 1005-1008
  • 9 Bloom JD, Ransom ER, Antunes MB, Becker DG. Quantifying the sharpness of osteotomes for dorsal hump reduction. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13 (02) 103-108
  • 10 Tasman A-J. Rhinoplasty - indications and techniques. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 6: Doc09
  • 11 Becker DG, McLaughlin Jr RB, Loevner LA, Mang A. The lateral osteotomy in rhinoplasty: clinical and radiographic rationale for osteotome selection. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (05) 1806-1816 , discussion 1817–1819
  • 12 Palhazi P, Daniel RK, Kosins AM. The osseocartilaginous vault of the nose: anatomy and surgical observations. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35 (03) 242-251
  • 13 Rohrich RJ, Adams WP, Ahmad J, Gunter JP. Dallas Rhinoplasty: Nasal Surgery by the Masters. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing, Inc;. 2014
  • 14 Papel ID, Frodel JL, Holt GR. , et al. Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; Management of the Bony Nasal Vault. 4th ed. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2016
  • 15 Harshbarger RJ, Sullivan PK. Lateral nasal osteotomies: implications of bony thickness on fracture patterns. Ann Plast Surg 1999; 42 (04) 365-370 , discussion 370–371
  • 16 Kuran I, Ozcan H, Usta A, Bas L. Comparison of four different types of osteotomes for lateral osteotomy: a cadaver study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1996; 20 (04) 323-326
  • 17 Ong AA, Farhood Z, Kyle AR, Patel KG. Interventions to decrease postoperative edema and ecchymosis after rhinoplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (05) 1448-1462
  • 18 Toriumi DM, Becker DG. Rhinoplasty Dissection Manual. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999
  • 19 Gruber RP, Garza RM, Cho GJ. Nasal bone osteotomies with nonpowered tools. Clin Plast Surg 2016; 43 (01) 73-83
  • 20 Becker DG, Palma P. Dorsal hump reduction and osteotomies. The Rhinoplasty Archive. . Published 2019. Available at: https://www.rhinoplastyarchive.com/articles/dorsal-hump-reduction-osteotomies . Accessed August 27, 2019
  • 21 Lavine DM, Lehman JA, Jackson T. Is the lacrimal apparatus injured following cosmetic rhinoplasty?. Arch Otolaryngol 1979; 105 (12) 719-720
  • 22 Murakami CS, Larrabee WF. Comparison of osteotomy techniques in the treatment of nasal fractures. Facial Plast Surg 1992; 8 (04) 209-219
  • 23 Rohrich RJ, Minoli JJ, Adams WP, Hollier LH. The lateral nasal osteotomy in rhinoplasty: an anatomic endoscopic comparison of the external versus the internal approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (05) 1309-1312 , discussion 1313
  • 24 Amar RE. Correction of the bony rings during the aesthetic rhinoplasty: apologia of the transpalpebral osteotomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1998; 22 (01) 29-37
  • 25 Ghassemi A, Riediger D, Hölzle F, Gerressen M. The intraoral approach to lateral osteotomy: the role of a diamond burr. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013; 37 (01) 135-138
  • 26 Azizzadeh B, Reilly M. Dorsal hump reduction and osteotomies. Clin Plast Surg 2016; 43 (01) 47-58
  • 27 Saban Y, Daniel RK, Polselli R, Trapasso M, Palhazi P. Dorsal preservation: the push down technique reassessed. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (02) 117-131
  • 28 Wolfe SA. On the maintenance and sharpening of instruments. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (5, Suppl): 89S-91S
  • 29 Ransom ER, Antunes MB, Bloom JD, Becker DG. Quantifying osteotome sharpness: comparing the major manufacturers. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 146 (05) 707-711
  • 30 Pribitkin EA, Lavasani LS, Shindle C, Greywoode JD. Sonic rhinoplasty: sculpting the nasal dorsum with the ultrasonic bone aspirator. Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (08) 1504-1507
  • 31 Robiony M, Toro C, Costa F, Sembronio S, Polini F, Politi M. Piezosurgery: a new method for osteotomies in rhinoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 2007; 18 (05) 1098-1100
  • 32 Kurt Yazar S, Serin M, Rakici IT, Sirvan SS, Irmak F, Yazar M. Comparison of piezosurgery, percutaneous osteotomy, and endonasal continuous osteotomy techniques with a caprine skull model. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72 (01) 107-113
  • 33 Wähmann M, Riedel F, Kovacevic M, Hopf A, Albers AE. Comparison of piezoelectric and conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty: a systematic review [in German]. HNO 2019; 67 (02) 98-109
  • 34 Ghavimi MA, Nezafati S, Yazdani J. , et al. Comparison of edema and ecchymosis in rhinoplasty candidates after lateral nasal osteotomy using piezosurgery and external osteotomy. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2018; 9 (03) 73-79
  • 35 Robiony M, Lazzarotto A, Nocini R, Costa F, Sembronio S, Franz L. Piezosurgery: ten years' experience of percutaneous osteotomies in rhinoplasty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 77 (06) 1237-1244