Extramedullary Guide Alignment Is not Affected by Obesity in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

Coronal alignment of the tibial implant correlates with survivorship of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially in obese patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if obesity affects coronal plane alignment of the tibial component when utilizing standard extramedullary tibial guide instrumentation during primary TKA. A retrospective review from June 2017 to February 2018 identified 142 patients (162 primary TKAs). There were 88 patients (100 knees) with body mass index (BMI) < 35 kg/m² and 54 patients (62 knees) with BMI ≥ 35.0 kg/m². The cohorts did not differ in age (p = 0.37), gender (p = 0.61), or Charlson's comorbidity index (p = 0.54). Four independent reviewers measured the angle between the base of the tibial component and the mechanical axis of the tibia on the anteroposterior view of long-leg film at first postoperative clinic visit. Outliers were defined as patients with greater than 5 degrees of varus or valgus alignment (n = 0). Reoperations and complications were recorded to 90 days postoperatively. There was no significant difference in mean tibial coronal alignment between the two groups (control alignment 90.8 ± 1.2 degree versus obese alignment 90.8 ± 1.2 degree, p = 0.91). There was no difference in varus versus valgus alignment (p = 0.19). There was no difference in the number of outliers (two in each group, p = 0.73). There was no difference in rate of reoperation (p = 1.0) or complication (p = 0.51). Obesity did not affect coronal plane alignment of the tibial component when using an extramedullary guide during primary TKA in our population.

Keywords

coronal alignment - obesity - primary total knee arthroplasty - alignment - arthroplasty survivorship - extramedullary tibial guide

Publication History

Received: 26 March 2019

Accepted: 13 December 2019

Article published online:
04 February 2020

• References

• 1 Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB. et al. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (428) 26-34
• 2 Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it?. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (6, Suppl): 39-43
• 3 Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, Pierson JL, Berend ME, Malinzak RA. The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (17) 1588-1596
• 4 Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (12) 2143-2149
• 5 Morgan SS, Bonshahi A, Pradhan N, Gregory A, Gambhir A, Porter ML. The influence of postoperative coronal alignment on revision surgery in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2008; 32 (05) 639-642
• 6 Liu HX, Shang P, Ying XZ, Zhang Y. Shorter survival rate in varus-aligned knees after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (08) 2663-2671
• 7 Chowdhry M, Bamne AB, Na YG, Kang YG, Kim TK. Prevalence and predictors of post-operative coronal alignment outliers and their association with the functional outcomes in navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (12) 2357-2362
• 8 Liljensøe A, Lauersen JO, Søballe K, Mechlenburg I. Overweight preoperatively impairs clinical outcome after knee arthroplasty: a cohort study of 197 patients 3–5 years after surgery. Acta Orthop 2013; 84 (04) 392-397
• 9 Abdel MP, Bonadurer III GF, Jennings MT, Hanssen AD. Increased aseptic tibial failures in patients with a BMI ≥ 35 and well-aligned total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (12) 2181-2184
• 10 Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR. et al. The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (02) 319-329
• 11 Krushell RJ, Fingeroth RJ. Primary total knee arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients: a 5- to 14-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (06, Suppl 2): 77-80
• 12 Estes CS, Schmidt KJ, McLemore R, Spangehl MJ, Clarke HD. Effect of body mass index on limb alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (Suppl. 08) 101-105
• 13 Elkins JM, Simoens KJ, Callaghan JJ. Lower extremity geometry in morbid obesity-considerations for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (10) 3304-3312
• 14 Abdel MP, Oussedik S, Parratte S, Lustig S, Haddad FS. Coronal alignment in total knee replacement: historical review, contemporary analysis, and future direction. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B [phone]
• 15 Rivière C, Lazic S, Boughton O, Wiart Y, Vïllet L, Cobb J. Current concepts for aligning knee implants: patient-specific or systematic?. EFORT Open Rev 2018; 3 (01) 1-6
• 16 Sassoon A, Nam D, Nunley R, Barrack R. Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (01) 151-158
• 17 Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Zhu J, Ruh EL, Howell SM, Barrack RL. Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (03) 895-902
• 18 Steimle JA, Groover MT, Webb BA, Ceccarelli BJ. Acute perioperative comparison of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation utilization during bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Surg Res Pract 2018; 2018: 9326459
• 19 Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Ruh EL. et al. Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (03) 889-894