Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35(06): 623-626
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1700888
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Fractures of the Mandibular Condyle

1   Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery Associates, Fort Worth, Texas
,
Yadranko Ducic
1   Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery Associates, Fort Worth, Texas
,
Robert Kellman
2   Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 November 2019 (online)

Abstract

There exists no consensus “gold standard” treatment for condylar fractures, and there is continued debate on whether condylar fractures should undergo surgical or conservative management. Herein, we review various techniques of conservative, closed, and open surgical treatments of condylar fractures. Also, we review complications associated with each treatment modality and compare and contrast closed and open management. Standardization of fracture classification schemes and treatment modalities is needed to elucidate the best course of action for each patient and each fracture.

 
  • References

  • 1 Marker P, Nielsen A, Bastian HL. Fractures of the mandibular condyle. Part 1: patterns of distribution of types and causes of fractures in 348 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 38 (05) 417-421
  • 2 Singh V, Bhagol A, Goel M, Kumar I, Verma A. Outcomes of open versus closed treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures: a prospective randomized study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68 (06) 1304-1309
  • 3 Asim MA, Ibrahim MW, Javed MU, Zahra R, Qayyum MU. Functional outcomes of open versus closed treatment of unilateral mandibular condylar fractures. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2019; 31 (01) 67-71
  • 4 Chrcanovic BR. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of mandibular condylar fractures: a meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 44 (02) 158-179
  • 5 Jain G, Kumar S, Rana AS, Bansal V, Sharma P, Vikram A. Temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a review of 44 cases. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 12 (02) 61-66
  • 6 Brandt MT, Haug RH. Open versus closed reduction of adult mandibular condyle fractures: a review of the literature regarding the evolution of current thoughts on management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61 (11) 1324-1332
  • 7 Worsaae N, Thorn JJ. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of unilateral dislocated low subcondylar fractures: a clinical study of 52 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 52 (04) 353-360 , discussion 360–361
  • 8 Zide MF, Kent JN. Indications for open reduction of mandibular condyle fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983; 41 (02) 89-98
  • 9 Cenzi R, Burlini D, Arduin L, Zollino I, Guidi R, Carinci F. Mandibular condyle fractures: evaluation of the Strasbourg Osteosynthesis Research Group classification. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20 (01) 24-28
  • 10 Eckelt U, Schneider M, Erasmus F. , et al. Open versus closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process-a prospective randomized multi-centre study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006; 34 (05) 306-314
  • 11 Ellis III E, Palmieri C, Throckmorton G. Further displacement of condylar process fractures after closed treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 57 (11) 1307-1316 , discussion 1316–1317
  • 12 van den Bergh B, Blankestijn J, van der Ploeg T, Tuinzing DB, Forouzanfar T. Conservative treatment of a mandibular condyle fracture: comparing intermaxillary fixation with screws or arch bar. A randomised clinical trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015; 43 (05) 671-676
  • 13 Rozeboom AVJ, Dubois L, Bos RRM, Spijker R, de Lange J. Closed treatment of unilateral mandibular condyle fractures in adults: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 46 (04) 456-464
  • 14 Smets LM, Van Damme PA, Stoelinga PJ. Non-surgical treatment of condylar fractures in adults: a retrospective analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2003; 31 (03) 162-167
  • 15 Kazanjian VH, Converse JM. The Surgical Treatment of Facial Injuries. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1974: 197-201
  • 16 Landes CA, Lipphardt R. Prospective evaluation of a pragmatic treatment rationale: open reduction and internal fixation of displaced and dislocated condyle and condylar head fractures and closed reduction of non-displaced, non-dislocated fractures. Part II: high condylar and condylar head fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35 (02) 115-126
  • 17 de Amaratunga NA. Mouth opening after release of maxillomandibular fixation in fracture patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 45 (05) 383-385
  • 18 Miyamoto H, Kurita K, Ogi N, Ishimaru JI, Goss AN. Effect of limited jaw motion on ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint in sheep. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 38 (02) 148-153
  • 19 Landes CA, Day K, Lipphardt R, Sader R. Closed versus open operative treatment of nondisplaced diacapitular (class VI) fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66 (08) 1586-1594
  • 20 Dijkstra PU, Stegenga B, de Bont LG, Bos RR. Function impairment and pain after closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle. J Trauma 2005; 59 (02) 424-430
  • 21 Emam HA, Jatana CA, Ness GM. Matching surgical approach to condylar fracture type. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2017; 25 (01) 55-61
  • 22 Ducic Y. Endoscopic treatment of subcondylar fractures. Laryngoscope 2008; 118 (07) 1164-1167
  • 23 Belli E, Liberatore G, Elidon M. , et al. Surgical evolution in the treatment of mandibular condyle fractures. BMC Surg 2015; 15: 16
  • 24 Mueller RV, Czerwinski M, Lee C, Kellman RM. Condylar fracture repair: use of the endoscope to advance traditional treatment philosophy. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2006; 14 (01) 1-9
  • 25 Schmelzeisen R, Cienfuegos-Monroy R, Schön R, Chen CT, Cunningham Jr L, Goldhahn S. Patient benefit from endoscopically assisted fixation of condylar neck fractures--a randomized controlled trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67 (01) 147-158
  • 26 Van Hevele J, Nout E. Complications of the retromandibular transparotid approach for low condylar neck and subcondylar fractures: a retrospective study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 44 (02) 73-78
  • 27 Al-Moraissi EA, Ellis III E. Surgical treatment of adult mandibular condylar fractures provides better outcomes than closed treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 73 (03) 482-493
  • 28 Eckelt U, Schneider M, Erasmus F. , et al. Open versus closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process-a prospective randomized multi-centre study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006; 34 (05) 306-314
  • 29 Kyzas PA, Saeed A, Tabbenor O. The treatment of mandibular condyle fractures: a meta-analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012; 40 (08) e438-e452
  • 30 Ellis III E, Throckmorton GS, Palmieri C. Open treatment of condylar process fractures: assessment of adequacy of repositioning and maintenance of stability. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58 (01) 27-34 , discussion 35
  • 31 Liu Y, Bai N, Song G. , et al. Open versus closed treatment of unilateral moderately displaced mandibular condylar fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 116 (02) 169-173
  • 32 Yao S, Zhou J, Li Z. Contrast analysis of open reduction and internal fixation and non-surgical treatment of condylar fracture: a meta-analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25 (06) 2077-2080