Weight-bearing CT Technology in Musculoskeletal Pathologies of the Lower Limbs: Techniques, Initial Applications, and Preliminary Combinations with Gait-Analysis Measurements at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Abstract

Musculoskeletal radiology has been mostly limited by the option between imaging under load but in two dimensions (i.e., radiographs) and three-dimensional (3D) scans but in unloaded conditions (i.e., computed tomography [CT] and magnetic resonance imaging in a supine position). Cone-beam technology is now also a way to image the extremities with 3D and weight-bearing CT. This article discusses the initial experience over a few studies in progress at an orthopaedic center. The custom design of total ankle replacements, the patellofemoral alignment after medial ligament reconstruction, the overall architecture of the foot bones in the diabetic foot, and the radiographic assessment of the rearfoot after subtalar fusion for correction of severe flat foot have all taken advantage of the 3D and weight-bearing feature of relevant CT scans. To further support these novel assessments, techniques have been developed to obtain 3D models of the bones from the scans and to merge these with state-of-the-art gait analyses.

Keywords

cone-beam CT - weight-bearing - three-dimensional bone models - gait analysis - plantar pressure

• References

• 1 Verhelst P, Verstraete L, Shaheen E. , et al. Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography analysis protocols for condylar remodelling following orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019 ; June 17 (Epub ahead of print)
• 2 Aydin U, Gormez O, Yildirim D. Cone-beam computed tomography imaging of dentoalveolar and mandibular fractures. Oral Radiol 2019 ; May 17 (Epub ahead of print)
• 3 Swennen GR, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130 (03) 410-416
• 4 Ricci PM, Boldini M, Bonfante E. , et al. Cone-beam computed tomography compared to X-ray in diagnosis of extremities bone fractures: a study of 198 cases. Eur J Radiol Open 2019; 6: 119-121
• 5 Ludlow J, Ivanovic M. Weightbearing CBCT, MDCT, and 2D imaging dosimetry of the foot and ankle. Int J Diagnostic Imaging 2014 1(02):
• 6 Ludlow JB. Hand-wrist, knee, and foot-ankle dosimetry and image quality measurements of a novel extremity imaging unit providing CBCT and 2D imaging options. Med Phys 2018; 45 (11) 4955-4963
• 7 Barg A, Bailey T, Richter M. , et al. Weightbearing computed tomography of the foot and ankle: emerging technology topical review. Foot Ankle Int 2018; 39 (03) 376-386
• 8 Lintz F, de Cesar Netto C, Barg A, Burssens A, Richter M. ; Weight Bearing CT International Study Group. Weight-bearing cone beam CT scans in the foot and ankle. EFORT Open Rev 2018; 3 (05) 278-286
• 9 Posadzy M, Desimpel J, Vanhoenacker F. Cone beam CT of the musculoskeletal system: clinical applications. Insights Imaging 2018; 9 (01) 35-45
• 10 Hamard M, Neroladaki A, Bagetakos I, Dubois-Ferrière V, Montet X, Boudabbous S. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography for syndesmosis injury diagnosis compared to conventional computed tomography. Foot Ankle Surg 2019 ; April 1 (Epub ahead of print)
• 11 Lamm BM, Stasko PA, Gesheff MG, Bhave A. normal foot and ankle radiographic angles, measurements, and reference points. J Foot Ankle Surg 2016; 55 (05) 991-998
• 12 Parr WC, Chatterjee HJ, Soligo C. Calculating the axes of rotation for the subtalar and talocrural joints using 3D bone reconstructions. J Biomech 2012; 45 (06) 1103-1107
• 13 Kai S, Sato T, Koga Y. , et al. Automatic construction of an anatomical coordinate system for three-dimensional bone models of the lower extremities—pelvis, femur, and tibia. J Biomech 2014; 47 (05) 1229-1233
• 14 Renault J-B, Aüllo-Rasser G, Donnez M, Parratte S, Chabrand P. Articular-surface-based automatic anatomical coordinate systems for the knee bones. J Biomech 2018; 80: 171-178
• 15 Saltzman CL, Nawoczenski DA, Talbot KD. Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76 (01) 45-49
• 16 Thomas JL, Kunkel MW, Lopez R, Sparks D. Radiographic values of the adult foot in a standardized population. J Foot Ankle Surg 2006; 45 (01) 3-12
• 17 Rungprai C, Goetz JE, Arunakul M. , et al. Validation and reproducibility of a biplanar imaging system versus conventional radiography of foot and ankle radiographic parameters. Foot Ankle Int 2014; 35 (11) 1166-1175
• 18 Maynou C, Szymanski C, Thiounn A. The adult cavus foot. EFORT Open Rev 2017; 2 (05) 221-229
• 19 Menz HB, Munteanu SE, Zammit GV, Landorf KB. Foot structure and function in older people with radiographic osteoarthritis of the medial midfoot. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010; 18 (03) 317-322
• 20 Gwani AS, Asari MA, Mohd Ismail ZI. How the three arches of the foot intercorrelate. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2017; 76 (04) 682-688
• 21 Zhou Y, Zhou B, Liu J. , et al. A prospective study of midfoot osteotomy combined with adjacent joint sparing internal fixation in treatment of rigid pes cavus deformity. J Orthop Surg Res 2014; 9: 44
• 22 Giannini S, Leardini A, O'Connor J. Total ankle replacement: review of the designs and of the current status. Foot Ankle Surg 2000; 6 (02) 77-88
• 23 Leardini A, O'Connor JJ, Catani F, Giannini S. Mobility of the human ankle and the design of total ankle replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (424) 39-46
• 24 Leardini A, O'Connor JJ, Giannini S. Biomechanics of the natural, arthritic, and replaced human ankle joint. J Foot Ankle Res 2014; 7 (01) 8
• 25 Omar IM, Abboud SF, Youngner JM. Imaging of total ankle arthroplasty: normal imaging findings and hardware complications. Sem Musculoskelet Radiol 2019; 23 (02) 177-194
• 26 Liverani E, Fortunato A, Leardini A. , et al. Fabrication of Co–Cr–Mo endoprosthetic ankle devices by means of Selective Laser Melting (SLM). Materials Design 2016; 106: 60-68
• 27 Wang X, Xu S, Zhou S. , et al. Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: a review. Biomaterials 2016; 83: 127-141
• 28 Belvedere C, Siegler S, Fortunato A. , et al. New comprehensive procedure for custom-made total ankle replacements: medical imaging, joint modeling, prosthesis design, and 3D printing. J Orthop Res 2019; 37 (03) 760-768
• 29 Giannini S, Romagnoli M, O'Connor JJ, Malerba F, Leardini A. Total ankle replacement compatible with ligament function produces mobility, good clinical scores, and low complication rates: an early clinical assessment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (10) 2746-2753
• 30 Durastanti G, Leardini A, Siegler S, Durante S, Bazzocchi A, Belvedere C. Comparison of ankle articular surfaces among morphological models derived from different medical imaging technologies. Quant Imaging Med Surg. In press
• 31 Giacomozzi C, Leardini A, Caravaggi P. Correlates between kinematics and baropodometric measurements for an integrated in-vivo assessment of the segmental foot function in gait. J Biomech 2014; 47 (11) 2654-2659
• 32 Hirschmann A, Pfirrmann CW, Klammer G, Espinosa N, Buck FM. Upright cone CT of the hindfoot: comparison of the non-weight-bearing with the upright weight-bearing position. Eur Radiol 2014; 24 (03) 553-558
• 33 Giacomozzi C, Martelli F, Nagel A, Schmiegel A, Rosenbaum D. Cluster analysis to classify gait alterations in rheumatoid arthritis using peak pressure curves. Gait Posture 2009; 29 (02) 220-224
• 34 Caravaggi P, Leardini A, Giacomozzi C. Multiple linear regression approach for the analysis of the relationships between joints mobility and regional pressure-based parameters in the normal-arched foot. J Biomech 2016; 49 (14) 3485-3491
• 35 Leardini A, Benedetti MG, Berti L, Bettinelli D, Nativo R, Giannini S. Rear-foot, mid-foot and fore-foot motion during the stance phase of gait. Gait Posture 2007; 25 (03) 453-462
• 36 Portinaro N, Leardini A, Panou A, Monzani V, Caravaggi P. Modifying the Rizzoli foot model to improve the diagnosis of pes-planus: application to kinematics of feet in teenagers. J Foot Ankle Res 2014; 7 (01) 754
• 37 Caravaggi P, Lullini G, Berti L, Giannini S, Leardini A. Functional evaluation of bilateral subtalar arthroereisis for the correction of flexible flatfoot in children: 1-year follow-up. Gait Posture 2018; 64: 152-158
• 38 Caravaggi P, Giangrande A, Berti L, Lullini G, Leardini A. Pedobarographic and kinematic analysis in the functional evaluation of two post-operative forefoot offloading shoes. J Foot Ankle Res 2015; 8 (01) 59
• 39 Caravaggi P, Giangrande A, Lullini G, Padula G, Berti L, Leardini A. In shoe pressure measurements during different motor tasks while wearing safety shoes: the effect of custom made insoles vs. prefabricated and off-the-shelf. Gait Posture 2016; 50: 232-238
• 40 Steel III MW, Johnson KA, DeWitz MA, Ilstrup DM. Radiographic measurements of the normal adult foot. Foot Ankle 1980; 1 (03) 151-158
• 41 Gentili A, Masih S, Yao L, Seeger LL. Pictorial review: foot axes and angles. Br J Radiol 1996; 69 (826) 968-974
• 42 Marzo J, Kluczynski M, Notino A, Bisson L. Comparison of a novel weightbearing cone beam computed tomography scanner versus a conventional computed tomography scanner for measuring patellar instability. Orthop J Sports Med 2016; 4 (12) 2325967116673560
• 43 Carrara C, Caravaggi P, Belvedere C, Leardini A. Radiographic angular measurements of the foot and ankle in weight-bearing: a literature review. Foot Ankle Surg 2019 ; July 31 (Epub ahead of print)
• 44 Gonzalez TA, Ehrlichman LK, Macaulay AA. , et al. Determining measurement error for Bohler's angle and the effect of X-ray obliquity on accuracy. Foot Ankle Spec 2016; 9 (05) 409-416
• 45 Neri T, Barthelemy R, Tourné Y. Radiologic analysis of hindfoot alignment: comparison of Méary, long axial, and hindfoot alignment views. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017; 103 (08) 1211-1216
• 46 Barg A, Harris MD, Henninger HB. , et al. Medial distal tibial angle: comparison between weightbearing mortise view and hindfoot alignment view. Foot Ankle Int 2012; 33 (08) 655-661
• 47 Dayton P, Feilmeier M, Hirschi J, Kauwe M, Kauwe JS. Observed changes in radiographic measurements of the first ray after frontal plane rotation of the first metatarsal in a cadaveric foot model. J Foot Ankle Surg 2014; 53 (03) 274-278
• 48 Buck FM, Hoffmann A, Mamisch-Saupe N, Espinosa N, Resnick D, Hodler J. Hindfoot alignment measurements: rotation-stability of measurement techniques on hindfoot alignment view and long axial view radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197 (03) 578-582
• 49 Leardini A, Caravaggi P, Theologis T, Stebbins J. Multi-segment foot models and their use in clinical populations. Gait Posture 2019; 69: 50-59
• 50 Caravaggi P, Matias AB, Taddei UT, Ortolani M, Leardini A, Sacco ICN. Reliability of medial-longitudinal-arch measures for skin-markers based kinematic analysis. J Biomech 2019; 88: 180-185
• 51 Shereff MJ, DiGiovanni L, Bejjani FJ, Hersh A, Kummer FJ. A comparison of nonweight-bearing and weight-bearing radiographs of the foot. Foot Ankle 1990; 10 (06) 306-311
• 52 Shelton T, Singh S, Kreulen C, Giza E. The influence of percentile weight bearing on foot radiographs. Foot Ankle Spec 2018 ; October 21 (Epub ahead of print)
• 53 Guo C, Zhu Y, Hu M, Deng L, Xu X. Reliability of measurements on lateral ankle radiographs. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17 (01) 297
• 54 Saltzman CL, Brandser EA, Berbaum KS. , et al. Reliability of standard foot radiographic measurements. Foot Ankle Int 1994; 15 (12) 661-665
• 55 Lin CS, Wu TY, Wang TM, Hou SM, Shih KS, Liaw CK. A new technique to increase reliability in measuring the axis of bone. J Foot Ankle Surg 2016; 55 (01) 106-111
• 56 Carrara C. 3D measurements of foot bone architecture in weight-bearing by cone-beam computed tomography. Paper presented at: Congress XXVII of the International Society of Biomechanics; July 31, 2019 ; Calgary, Canada
• 57 Matsiushevich K, Belvedere C, Leardini A, Durante S. Quantitative comparison of freeware software for bone mesh from DICOM files. J Biomech 2019; 84: 247-251
• 58 Peiffer M, Belvedere C, Clockaerts S. , et al; WBCT ISG. Three-dimensional displacement after a medializing calcaneal osteotomy in relation to the osteotomy angle and hindfoot alignment. Foot Ankle Surg 2018 ; December 7 (Epub ahead of print)
• 59 Hussain AM, Packota G, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Role of different imaging modalities in assessment of temporomandibular joint erosions and osteophytes: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37 (02) 63-71
• 60 Belvedere C, Cadossi M, Mazzotti A, Giannini S, Leardini A. Fluoroscopic and gait analyses for the functional performance of a custom-made total talonavicular replacement. J Foot Ankle Surg 2017; 56 (04) 836-844
• 61 Giannini S, Cadossi M, Mazzotti A, Ramponi L, Belvedere C, Leardini A. Custom-made total talonavicular replacement in a professional rock climber. J Foot Ankle Surg 2016; 55 (06) 1271-1275
• 62 Lintz F, Welck M, Bernasconi A. , et al. 3D biometrics for hindfoot alignment using weightbearing CT. Foot Ankle Int 2017; 38 (06) 684-689
• 63 Zhang JZ, Lintz F, Bernasconi A, Zhang S, Zhang S. ; Weight Bearing CT International Study Group. 3D biometrics for hindfoot alignment using weightbearing computed tomography. Foot Ankle Int 2019; 40 (06) 720-726