Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2019; 32(06): 440-446
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1692979
Original Research
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Comparative Stiffness of an Equine Distal Sesamoid Bone Fracture Model Stabilized with 3.5-mm versus 4.5-mm Cortical Bone Screws in Lag Fashion

Jessica R. Mampe
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Iowa State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, Iowa, Unites States
,
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Iowa State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, Iowa, Unites States
,
David G. Suarez-Fuentes
2   BluePearl Veterinary Partners, Franklin, Tennessee, Unites States
,
Karl H. Kraus
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Iowa State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, Iowa, Unites States
› Author Affiliations
Funding The present study was funded by the Iowa State University—Faculty Development Funds.
Further Information

Publication History

08 November 2018

03 May 2019

Publication Date:
06 July 2019 (online)

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to to determine the comparative stiffness following repair of an axial sagittal fracture model in equine distal sesamoid bones using either a single 3.5-mm or 4.5-mm cortical bone screw placed in lag fashion.

Study Design The present study was an in vitro biomechanical study.

Results The mean (±standard deviation) stiffness value for the 4.5-mm screw–bone construct (522.49 N/mm ± 168.21) was significantly greater than the 3.5-mm screw-bone construct (408.46 N/mm ± 131.13) (p = 0.047). This represents a 28% difference in mean stiffness.

ConclusionsIn vitro, the 4.5-mm screw–bone construct creates a stiffer repair of fractured distal sesamoid bones by a margin of 28%. The 4.5-mm cortical bone screw may better withstand forces imparted on the distal sesamoid bone sustained during anaesthetic recovery, normal weight bearing and athletic exercise, thereby minimizing the risk of implant failure.

Author Contribution

J. Mampe (acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation); D. Tatarniuk (conception of the study, study design, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation); D. Suarez (conception of the study, acquisition of data); K. Kraus (study design, data analysis and interpretation). All authors drafted, revised and approved the submitted manuscript.


 
  • References

  • 1 Lillich JD, Ruggles AJ, Gabel AA, Bramlage LR, Schneider RK. Fracture of the distal sesamoid bone in horses: 17 cases (1982-1992). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995; 207 (07) 924-927
  • 2 Colles CM. How to repair navicular bone fractures in the horse. Proc Am Assoc Equine Practnr 2001; 47: 270-278
  • 3 Németh F, Dik KJ. Lag screw fixation of sagittal navicular bone fractures in five horses. Equine Vet J 1985; 17 (02) 137-139
  • 4 Furst A, Lischer C. Foot. In: Auer JA, Stick JA. , eds. Equine Surgery. 5th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2018: 1571-1575
  • 5 Gasiorowski JC, Richardson DW. Clinical use of computed tomography and surface markers to assist internal fixation within the equine hoof. Vet Surg 2015; 44 (02) 214-222
  • 6 Schwarz CS, Rudolph T, Kowal J, Auer JA. Introduction of 3.5mm and 4.5mm cortex screws into the equine distal sesamoid bone with the help of the VetGate Computer Assisted Surgery Systems and comparison of the results with the previously reported ones, acquired with SurgiGATE 1.0 System – an in vitro study. Pferdeheilkunde 2017; 33: 223-230
  • 7 Perrin R, Launois T, Brogniez L. , et al. Computed tomography to identify preoperative guidelines for internal fixation of the distal sesamoid bone in horses: an in vitro study. Vet Surg 2010; 39 (08) 1030-1036
  • 8 Manfredi JM, Boyce M, Malone ED, Anderson C, Anderson LB, Trumble TN. Steroid diffusion into the navicular bursa occurs in horses affected by palmar foot pain. Vet Rec 2012; 171 (25) 642
  • 9 Nunamaker DM. General techniques and biomechanics. In: Fackelman GE, Auer JA, Nunamaker DM. , eds. AO Principles of Equine Osteosynthesis. 1st ed. New York: Thieme Publishing; 2000: 12-15
  • 10 Auer J. Principles of fracture treatment. In: Auer JA, Stick JA. , eds. Equine Surgery. 5th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2018: 1277
  • 11 Milgrom C, Giladi M, Simkin A. , et al. The area moment of inertia of the tibia: a risk factor for stress fractures. J Biomech 1989; 22 (11–12): 1243-1248
  • 12 Galuppo LD, Stover SM, Jensen DG, Willits NH. A biomechanical comparison of headless tapered variable pitch and AO cortical bone screws for fixation of a simulated lateral condylar fracture in equine third metacarpal bones. Vet Surg 2001; 30 (04) 332-340
  • 13 Bueno AC, Galuppo LD, Taylor KT, Jensen DG, Stover SM. A biomechanical comparison of headless tapered variable pitch and AO cortical bone screws for fixation of a simulated slab fracture in equine third carpal bones. Vet Surg 2003; 32 (02) 167-177
  • 14 Eddy AL, Galuppo LD, Stover SM, Taylor KT, Jensen DG. A biomechanical comparison of headless tapered variable pitch compression and ao cortical bone screws for fixation of a simulated midbody transverse fracture of the proximal sesamoid bone in horses. Vet Surg 2004; 33 (03) 253-262
  • 15 Oomen AM, Oosterlinck M, Pille F, Sonneveld DC, Gasthuys F, Back W. Use of a pressure plate to analyse the toe-heel load redistribution underneath a normal shoe and a shoe with a wide toe in sound warmblood horses at the walk and trot. Res Vet Sci 2012; 93 (02) 1026-1031
  • 16 Oosterlinck M, Pille F, Back W, Dewulf J, Gasthuys F. A pressure plate study on fore and hindlimb loading and the association with hoof contact area in sound ponies at the walk and trot. Vet J 2011; 190 (01) 71-76