The Effect of Ambient Temperature and Implantation Time on the Material Properties of Two Viscosity-Differing Cements Using American Society of Testing and Materials Methodology

Abstract

Ambient temperature and time to implantation can affect the material properties of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement, and cement intrusion depth has been shown to affect implant fixation. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of ambient temperature and time to implantation on depth of intrusion, and the effect of ambient temperature on setting time. Two types of cements were evaluated: cement A (Simplex P,medium Q7 viscosity) and cement B (Palacos R, high viscosity). Dough, working and setting times were determined, as well as intrusion depth, at different temperatures per American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) protocol F451. A vacuum mixer was used in a temperature- and humidity-controlled environment at 60, 65, and 70°F. At each temperature, the cement was placed into an intrusion mold at 0, 50, and 100% of working time. Increasing ambient temperature resulted in a significant decrease in dough and working and setting times for both cements (p = 0.038 − < 0.001). At each working time point and temperature, cement A showed significantly more intrusion than cement B (p = 0.044 − < 0.001). There was no effect of temperature on intrusion depth regardless of working time to implantation for either cement with the exception of cement B when comparing 60 versus 70°F at 0% working time (p = 0.004). Both cements showed a significant decrease in intrusion as time to implantation increased (p < 0.001). In conclusion, there are large inherent differences in properties of commercially available cements, and these properties are affected by such variables as time to implantation and ambient temperatures. An understanding of these properties may aid the surgeon in optimizing surgical outcomes.

Keywords

bone cement - viscosity - intrusion depth - Simplex P - Palacos R

• References

• 1 Jaeblon T. Polymethylmethacrylate: properties and contemporary uses in orthopaedics. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010; 18 (05) 297-305
• 2 Jiranek W. Thermal manipulation of bone cement. Orthopedics 2005; 28 (8, Suppl): s863-s866
• 3 Schlegel UJ, Siewe J, Delank KS. , et al. Pulsed lavage improves fixation strength of cemented tibial components. Int Orthop 2011; 35 (08) 1165-1169
• 4 Gebert de Uhlenbrock A, Püschel V, Püschel K, Morlock MM, Bishop NE. Influence of time in-situ and implant type on fixation strength of cemented tibial trays - a post mortem retrieval analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2012; 27 (09) 929-935
• 5 Beaudoin AJ, Mihalko WM, Krause WR. Finite element modelling of polymethylmethacrylate flow through cancellous bone. J Biomech 1991; 24 (02) 127-136
• 6 Pearson GP, Jones DF, Wright V. Letter: Effect of operating-theatre temperatures on the setting-times of acrylic cements for use in orthopaedic surgery. Lancet 1975; 2 (7926): 184
• 7 Klein RW, Scott CP, Higham PA. The strength of acrylic bone cement cured under thumb pressure. Biomaterials 2004; 25 (05) 943-947
• 8 Meyer Jr PR, Lautenschlager EP, Moore BK. On the setting properties of acrylic bone cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973; 55 (01) 149-156
• 9 Langdown AJ, Tsai N, Auld J, Walsh WR, Walker P, Bruce WJ. The influence of ambient theater temperature on cement setting time. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (03) 381-384
• 10 Lewis G. Effect of mixing method and storage temperature of cement constituents on the fatigue and porosity of acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1999; 48 (02) 143-149
• 11 Dayton MR, Incavo SJ, Churchill DL, Uroskie JA, Beynnon BD. Effects of early and late stage cement intrusion into cancellous bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 405 (405) 39-45
• 12 Kopec M, Milbrandt JC, Kohut N, Kern B, Allan DG. Effect of bone cement viscosity and set time on mantle area in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 2009; 38 (10) 519-522