Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2019; 23(02): e1-e19
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1681048
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Imaging of Pelvic and Femoral Fixation Hardware: Normal Findings and Hardware Failure

Hatice Tuba Sanal
1   Department of Radiology, Health Sciences University, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Christina Boulton
2   Department of Orthopaedics, Banner Health and the University of Arizona-Tucson, Tucson, Arizona
,
Cagri Neyisci
3   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Health Sciences University, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Yusuf Erdem
3   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Health Sciences University, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Jason Lowe
2   Department of Orthopaedics, Banner Health and the University of Arizona-Tucson, Tucson, Arizona
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 March 2019 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Good outcomes following treatment of pelvic ring injuries, acetabular fractures, and femur fractures rely on restoration of native pelvic or limb alignment, anatomical reduction and rigid stability of articular fractures, and early postoperative mobilization. Multiple surgical approaches, reduction aids, and orthopaedic implants are available to stabilize these fractures. Despite best practices, complications including hardware failure, nonunions, malunions, and infections occur. This article discusses common fracture classification systems, implants, and imaging findings associated with unwanted complications in fractures of the pelvis, acetabulum, and femur.