Semin Plast Surg 2018; 32(04): 187-190
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1672207
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Creating Value in Plastic Surgery

Faryan Jalalabadi
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Shayan A. Izaddoost
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Edward M. Reece
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 October 2018 (online)

Abstract

Value is defined as the worth, utility, or importance something holds. It can be derived from a variety of goods and services and is relative to a given industry or population. This article will discuss elements of plastic surgery that hold value as to how it pertains to the key players in a medical transaction. It will also discuss strategies for identifying and generating value. Roles of the different members in a plastic surgery transaction were analyzed, specifically the patient, the surgeon, and the facility. Different factors that generated value for all parties were identified throughout the literature. Factors identified that created value included the following: the surgeon's knowledge, experience, and decision-making ability; and technical skill/speed, restoration of life, restoration of form and function, restoration of psychological deficit, instant surgical results, convenience of access, outcomes, cost accounting, research, compassion, and bedside manner. Plastic surgeons can gear their practice to provide the system and their patients with services that hold value. We present several factors that can generate value for the patient, surgeon, and hospital system.

 
  • References

  • 1 Wei CH, Scott AM, Price AN. , et al. Psychosocial and sexual well-being following nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction. Breast J 2016; 22 (01) 10-17
  • 2 Porter MEN. What is value in health care?. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 (26) 2477-2481
  • 3 Ghomrawi HM, Eggman AA, Pearle AD. Effect of age on cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with total knee arthroplasty in the U.S. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (05) 396-402
  • 4 Cheung K, Kaur MN, Tolliver T, Longo CJ, Naam NH, Thoma A. A tale of two health-care systems: cost-utility analysis of open carpal tunnel release in Canada and the United States. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2017; 25 (01) 7-13
  • 5 Poenaru D, Lin D, Corlew S. Economic valuation of the global burden of cleft disease averted by a large cleft charity. World J Surg 2016; 40 (05) 1053-1059
  • 6 Gfrerer L, Guyuron B. Surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Acta Neurol Belg 2017; 117 (01) 27-32
  • 7 Coffman KL, Siemionow MZ. Face transplantation: psychological outcomes at three-year follow-up. Psychosomatics 2013; 54 (04) 372-378
  • 8 Lindsay RW, Bhama P, Hadlock TA. Quality-of-life improvement after free gracilis muscle transfer for smile restoration in patients with facial paralysis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2014; 16 (06) 419-424
  • 9 Datillo JR, Gittings DJ, Sloan M, Hardaker WM, Deasey MJ, Sheth NP. “Is there an app for that?” Orthopaedic patient preferences for a smartphone application. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (03) 832-844
  • 10 Jackson CR, Eavey RD, Francis DO. Surgeon awareness of operating room supply costs. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2016; 125 (05) 369-377