Download PDF
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019; 80(01): 001-009
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1654702
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Surgical Outcomes, Complications, and Management Strategies for Foramen Magnum Meningiomas

Stephen T. Magill
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Maryam N. Shahin   *
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Calixto-Hope G. Lucas   *
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Adam J. Yen
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
David S. Lee
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
David R. Raleigh
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
2   Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Manish K. Aghi
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Philip V. Theodosopoulos
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Michael W. McDermott
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
› Author Affiliations
Disclosure of Funding This work was supported by the Linda Wolfe Meningioma Research Fund and the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (1F32CA213944–01) to S.T.M.A preliminary version of this work was presented at the 2016 North American Skull Base Society Annual Meeting in Scottsdale, AZ. The abstract of that presentation was published (J Neurol Surg B 2016; 77 - A033). This complete work has not been previously published or presented at the time of submission.
Further Information

Publication History

05 January 2018

15 April 2018

Publication Date:
28 May 2018 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives Foramen magnum meningiomas (FMM) are complex lesions because of their proximity to the brain stem and posterior cerebrovasculature. The objective of this study is to report surgical outcomes and complications after resection of FMM.

Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with FMM from 1998 to 2015. Univariate logistic regression and recursive partitioning analysis were used to identify risk factors associated with complications and extent of resection (EOR).

Results We identified 28 patients with FMM. Median follow-up was 5.9 years. Tumors were World Health Organization grade I (92.9%) or grade II (7.1%). The vertebral artery was completely encased (25%), partially encased (11%), or not encased (64%). Median size was 11.9 cm3. EOR was gross total (39%) and subtotal (61%). The observed recurrence rate was 4% (n = 1). There were 38 complications in 12 patients (43%), and 6 patients (21%) had complications requiring additional surgery. Complications included cerebrospinal fluid leak/hydrocephalus (n = 7, 25%), weakness (n = 4, 14%), numbness (n = 4, 14%), and cranial nerve deficits: IX, X (n = 4, 14%), XI (n = 2, 7%), XII (n = 5, 18%). Medical complications included pneumonia (n = 1, 4%) and meningitis (n = 1, 4%). Tumor volume greater than 14 cm3 (odds ratio [OR] = 21.7, p = 0.0010), any vertebral artery encasement (OR 6.1, p = 0.0386), and subtotal resection (OR 6.4, p = 0.0398) were significantly associated with complications. Tumor volume greater than 14 cm3 was also significantly associated with subtotal resection (OR 8.3, p = 0.0201).

Conclusions Resection of FMM carries perioperative morbidity that increases with larger tumor size. Despite the morbidity, long-term recurrence-free survival is achievable with maximal safe resection and adjuvant radiation.

Keywords

foramen magnum - meningioma - complications - outcomes - vertebral artery - surgical technique - approach - management

* These authors contributed equally to this article.


 

  • References

  • 1 Rogers L, Barani I, Chamberlain M. , et al. Meningiomas: knowledge base, treatment outcomes, and uncertainties. A RANO review. J Neurosurg 2015; 122 (01) 4-23
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Xu J. , et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2009-2013. Neuro-oncol 2016; 18 (suppl_5): v1-v75
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Arnautović KI, Al-Mefty O, Husain M. Ventral foramen magnum meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2000; 92 (1, Suppl): 71-80
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Bruneau M, George B. Classification system of foramen magnum meningiomas. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2010; 1 (01) 10-17
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 David CA, Spetzler RF. Foramen magnum meningiomas. Clin Neurosurg 1997; 44: 467-489
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Boulton MR, Cusimano MD. Foramen magnum meningiomas: concepts, classifications, and nuances. Neurosurg Focus 2003; 14 (06) e10
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Flores BC, Boudreaux BP, Klinger DR, Mickey BE, Barnett SL. The far-lateral approach for foramen magnum meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 2013; 35 (06) E12
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Nanda A, Vincent DA, Vannemreddy PS, Baskaya MK, Chanda A. Far-lateral approach to intradural lesions of the foramen magnum without resection of the occipital condyle. J Neurosurg 2002; 96 (02) 302-309
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Kratimenos GP, Crockard HA. The far lateral approach for ventrally placed foramen magnum and upper cervical spine tumours. Br J Neurosurg 1993; 7 (02) 129-140
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Sen CN, Sekhar LN. An extreme lateral approach to intradural lesions of the cervical spine and foramen magnum. Neurosurgery 1990; 27 (02) 197-204
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Sanai N, McDermott MW. A modified far-lateral approach for large or giant meningiomas of the posterior fossa. J Neurosurg 2010; 112 (05) 907-912
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. ; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med 2007; 4 (10) e296
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Bruneau M, George B. Foramen magnum meningiomas: detailed surgical approaches and technical aspects at Lariboisière Hospital and review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev 2008; 31 (01) 19-32 , discussion 32–33
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Goel A, Desai K, Muzumdar D. Surgery on anterior foramen magnum meningiomas using a conventional posterior suboccipital approach: a report on an experience with 17 cases. Neurosurgery 2001; 49 (01) 102-106 , discussion 106–107
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Khattar N, Koutourousiou M, Chabot JD. , et al. Endoscopic endonasal and transcranial surgery for microsurgical resection of ventral foramen magnum meningiomas: a preliminary experience. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2018; 14 (05) 503-514
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Li D, Wu Z, Ren C. , et al. Foramen magnum meningiomas: surgical results and risks predicting poor outcomes based on a modified classification. J Neurosurg 2017; 126 (03) 661-676
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Talacchi A, Biroli A, Soda C, Masotto B, Bricolo A. Surgical management of ventral and ventrolateral foramen magnum meningiomas: report on a 64-case series and review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev 2012; 35 (03) 359-367 , discussion 367–368
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Margalit NS, Lesser JB, Singer M, Sen C. Lateral approach to anterolateral tumors at the foramen magnum: factors determining surgical procedure. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (2, Suppl): 324-336 , discussion 324–336
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Sekhar LN, Wright DC, Richardson R, Monacci W. Petroclival and foramen magnum meningiomas: surgical approaches and pitfalls. J Neurooncol 1996; 29 (03) 249-259
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Pettersson-Segerlind J, Orrego A, Lönn S, Mathiesen T. Long-term 25-year follow-up of surgically treated parasagittal meningiomas. World Neurosurg 2011; 76 (06) 564-571
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Oya S, Kim S-H, Sade B, Lee JH. The natural history of intracranial meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (05) 1250-1256
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Kaprealian T, Raleigh DR, Sneed PK, Nabavizadeh N, Nakamura JL, McDermott MW. Parameters influencing local control of meningiomas treated with radiosurgery. J Neurooncol 2016; 128 (02) 357-364
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Chen WC, Magill ST, Wu A. , et al. Histopathologic features predict local control of atypical meningioma after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. J Neurosurg 2017 doi: 10.3171/2017.9.JNS171609
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar