Thromb Haemost 1973; 29(03): 671-678
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1648109
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Retention of Platelets by Glass Beads Variation with the Age of the Individual[*]

U Bucher
1   Central Laboratory of Hematology, Inselspital, and Institute of Mathematical Statistics of the University, Bern
,
Y Robert
1   Central Laboratory of Hematology, Inselspital, and Institute of Mathematical Statistics of the University, Bern
,
H Riedwyl
1   Central Laboratory of Hematology, Inselspital, and Institute of Mathematical Statistics of the University, Bern
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 June 2018 (online)

Summary

Platelet function has been evaluated by Hellem’s original method in carefully screened normal persons of various ages. Factors which could possibly influence platelet behaviour, such as drugs, smoking, hypercholesteremia, prediabetes, hypertension or uremia were excluded in preliminary examinations. Only individuals in perfect health without a history of coronary heart disease, peripheral vascular disease or other thrombotic disorders were selected. Physical activity did correspond to the age. Variation in results possibly due to technical factors were eliminated by using strictly the same method and material throughout the study and by performing the tests within a relatively short period of time. From an original group of 109 normal persons, 70 individuals between the ages of 10 and 90, who corresponded to the described standards were chosen for further trials. They were divided into 7 age groups, each including 10 individuals within a decade (the last group ranging from 70 to 90 years). Retention of platelets in a column of glass beads was measured by Hellem5s method. The results, expressed as per cent retention and represented graphically, form a parabolic curve with its minimum at the age of 35 (mean ± 2 SD = 50 i 22%). The mathematical function of the curve can be expressed in a formula as second degree polynomial. It is shown by analysis of variance that age is the only factor on which the slope of the curve depends. Physiological or pathological implications of these findings are not known. The results, however, show that age must be taken into account when differences of platelet behaviour are discussed.

* Part of this work has been presented at the 2nd Congress of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Oslo 1971.


 
  • References

  • 1 Baumgartner H. R. 1967; Die Messung der Thrombozytenadhäsivität. Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift 97: 1674.
  • 2 Bowie E. J. W, Owen Jr. C. A., Thompson Jr. J. H., Didisheim P. 1969; Platelet adhesiveness in von Willebrand’s disease. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 52: 69.
  • 3 Bowie E. J, Owen C. 1971; Some factors influencing platelet retention in glass bead columns including the influence of plastics. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 56: 479.
  • 4 Breddin K. 1965; Über die gesteigerte Thrombozytenagglutination bei Gefäßkrankheiten. Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift 95: 655.
  • 5 Coller B, Zucker M. 1971; Some factors affecting platelet retention in glass bead columns. Proceedings of the Society of Experimental and Biological Medicine 136: 769.
  • 6 Cronberg S. 1967; Methodological problems in testing of platelet adhesiveness. Scandinavian Journal of Haematology 04: 385.
  • 7 Cronberg S. 1968; Investigations in haemorrhagic disorders with prolonged bleeding time but normal number of platelets (with special reference to platelet adhesiveness). Acta Medica Scandinavica Supplement 486.
  • 8 Feissly R, Luedin H. 1949; Microscopie par contraste de phase. Revue d’Hématologie 04: 481.
  • 9 Gaarder A, Jonsen J, Laland S, Hellem A. J, Owren P. A. 1961; Adenosine diphosphate in red cells as a factor in the adhesiveness of human blood platelets. Nature 192: 531.
  • 10 Hartmann R. C. 1968; Tests of platelet adhesiveness and their clinical significance. Seminars in Haematology 05: 60.
  • 11 Hellem A. J. 1960; The adhesiveness of human blood platelets in vitro. Scandinavian Journal of clinical and Laboratory Investigation 12 Supplement 51.
  • 12 Hirsh J, McBride J. A. 1965; Increased Platelet Adhesiveness in Recurrent Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism. British Medical Journal 02: 797.
  • 13 Horlick L. 1961; Platelet adhesion in normal persons and subjects with atherosclerosis. American Journal of Cardiology 08: 459.
  • 14 Moolten S. E, Vroman L. 1949; The adhesiveness of blood platelets in thromboembolism and hemorrhagic disorders. I. Measurements of platelet adhesiveness by glass wool filter. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 19: 701.
  • 15 O’Brien J. R, Heywood J. B. 1967; Some interactions between human platelets and glass : von Willebrand’s disease compared with normal. Journal of Clinical Pathology 20: 56.
  • 16 Rossi E. C, Green D. 1972; A Study of Platelet Retention by Glass Bead Columns (“Platelet Adhesiveness” in Normal Subjects). British Journal of Haematology 23: 47.
  • 17 Salzman E. W. 1963; Measurement of platelet adhesiveness. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 62: 724.
  • 18 Sano T, Boxer M. G. J, Boxer L. A, Yokoyama M. 1971; Platelet Sensitivity to Aggregation in Normal and Diseased Groups. A Method for Assessment of Platelet Aggregability. Thrombosis et Diathesis Haemorrhagica 25: 524.
  • 19 Stormorken H. 1970; Platelet Adhesiveness in Coronary Heart Disease. Evaluation of the Plateletrich Plasma-ADP Method. Acta medica scandinavica 188: 339.
  • 20 Zucker M. B, Rifkin P. L, Friedberg N. M, Coller B. S. 1972; Mechanisms of Platelet Function as Revealed by the Retention of Platelets in Glass Bead Columns. Annuals of the New York Academy of Sciences 201: 138.