Semin intervent Radiol 2018; 35(02): 105-107
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1642038
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Inferior Vena Cava Filters and Prevention of Recurrent Pulmonary Embolism

Anuj Malhotra
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
,
Sirish Kishore
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
,
David Trost
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
,
David C. Madoff
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
,
Ronald S. Winokur
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 June 2018 (online)

Abstract

Although inferior vena cava (IVC) filters have a clear role in preventing recurrent pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with venous thromboembolism who cannot be anticoagulated, the role of filters in patients who are candidates for anticoagulation is controversial. With limited and conflicting data, practitioners often have to make an educated patient-specific decision when encountering this scenario. This article reviews the available data on the efficacy and risks associated with adjunctive IVC filter use to prevent recurrent PE.

 
  • References

  • 1 Trousseau. Clinique medicale de l'Hotel-Dieu de Paris. Paris: Bailliere; 1865
  • 2 Caplin DM, Nikolic B, Kalva SP, Ganguli S, Saad WE, Zuckerman DA. ; Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of inferior vena cava filter placement for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22 (11) 1499-1506
  • 3 Greenfield LJ, McCurdy JR, Brown PP, Elkins RC. A new intracaval filter permitting continued flow and resolution of emboli. Surgery 1973; 73 (04) 599-606
  • 4 Stein PD, Kayali F, Olson RE. Twenty-one-year trends in the use of inferior vena cava filters. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164 (14) 1541-1545
  • 5 Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF. , et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133 (6, Suppl): 381S-453S
  • 6 Kaufman JA, Kinney TB, Streiff MB. , et al. Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the Society of Interventional Radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17 (03) 449-459
  • 7 Hyers TM, Agnelli G, Hull RD. , et al. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. Chest 2001; 119 (1, Suppl): 176S-193S
  • 8 Jacobs DG, Sing RF. The role of vena caval filters in the management of venous thromboembolism. Am Surg 2003; 69 (08) 635-642
  • 9 Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F. , et al. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prévention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998; 338 (07) 409-415
  • 10 Group PS. ; PREPIC Study Group. Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study. Circulation 2005; 112 (03) 416-422
  • 11 Mismetti P, Laporte S, Pellerin O. , et al; PREPIC2 Study Group. Effect of a retrievable inferior vena cava filter plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone on risk of recurrent pulmonary embolism: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015; 313 (16) 1627-1635
  • 12 Stein PD, Matta F, Keyes DC, Willyerd GL. Impact of vena cava filters on in-hospital case fatality rate from pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2012; 125 (05) 478-484