Knowledge-Based Systems

Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Weibo

PDF herunterladen

Yearb Med Inform 1993; 02(01): 399-401
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1637984

Synopsis

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

M. G. Kahn

¹Division of Medical Informatics Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, USA

Weitere Informationen

Publikationsdatum:
05. März 2018 (online)

#

References
1 Musen MA. Dimensions of knowledge sharing and reuse. Comput Biomed Res 1992; 25: 435-67.
2 Sandblad B, Meinzer HP. Modelling and simulation of complex control structures in cell biology. Meth Inf Med 1992; 31: 36-43.
3 Heckerman DE, Nathwani BN. Toward normative expert systems: Part II. Probability-based representations. for efficient knowledge acquisition and inference. Meth Inf Med 1992; 31: 106-16.
4 Koski EMJ, Makivirta A, Sukuvaara T, Kari A. Development of an expert system for haemodynamic monitoring: computerized symbolization of on-line monitoring data. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1991; 8: 289-93.
5 Verdaguer A, Patak A, Sancho JJ, Sierra C, Sanz F. Validation of the medical expert system PNEUMON-IA. Comput Biomed Res 1992; 25: 511-268.
6 Kotzke K, Pretschner DP. Possibilities of software phantoms for quality control of KBS in nuclear medicine. Meth Inf Med 1992; 31: 126-34.
7 Van Bemmel JH, McCray AT. Eds. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 1992. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 1992
8 Wyatt J, Spiegelhalter D. Evaluating medical expert systems: What to test and how?. Med Inform 1990; 15: 205-17.
9 Compton P, Hom K, Quinlan JR, Lazarus L, Ho K. Maintaining an expert system. In: Quinlan JR. ed. Applications of Expert Systems Glasgow, Scotland: Turing Institute Press; 1989: 366-84.
10 Miller PL, Sittig DF. The evaluation of clinical decision support systems: What is necessary versus what is interesting. Med Inform 1990; 15: 185-90.

References
1 Musen MA. Dimensions of knowledge sharing and reuse. Comput Biomed Res 1992; 25: 435-67.
2 Sandblad B, Meinzer HP. Modelling and simulation of complex control structures in cell biology. Meth Inf Med 1992; 31: 36-43.
3 Heckerman DE, Nathwani BN. Toward normative expert systems: Part II. Probability-based representations. for efficient knowledge acquisition and inference. Meth Inf Med 1992; 31: 106-16.
4 Koski EMJ, Makivirta A, Sukuvaara T, Kari A. Development of an expert system for haemodynamic monitoring: computerized symbolization of on-line monitoring data. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1991; 8: 289-93.
5 Verdaguer A, Patak A, Sancho JJ, Sierra C, Sanz F. Validation of the medical expert system PNEUMON-IA. Comput Biomed Res 1992; 25: 511-268.
6 Kotzke K, Pretschner DP. Possibilities of software phantoms for quality control of KBS in nuclear medicine. Meth Inf Med 1992; 31: 126-34.
7 Van Bemmel JH, McCray AT. Eds. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 1992. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 1992
8 Wyatt J, Spiegelhalter D. Evaluating medical expert systems: What to test and how?. Med Inform 1990; 15: 205-17.
9 Compton P, Hom K, Quinlan JR, Lazarus L, Ho K. Maintaining an expert system. In: Quinlan JR. ed. Applications of Expert Systems Glasgow, Scotland: Turing Institute Press; 1989: 366-84.
10 Miller PL, Sittig DF. The evaluation of clinical decision support systems: What is necessary versus what is interesting. Med Inform 1990; 15: 185-90.