Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 1994; 33(05): 488-495
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1635060
Clinical Systems
Schattauer GmbH

Terminology of the Thalamus and its Representation in a Part-Whole Relation

H. Axer
1   Institute of Anatomy, Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany
,
K. Niemann
1   Institute of Anatomy, Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract:

In stereotaxic neurosurgery, a variety of operative procedures focus on thalamic targets. The nomenclature of thalamic nuclei and sub-nuclei, however, has not yet been settled. In clinical and laboratory environments several terminologies coexist. This is an obstacle to both communication and a better understanding of recent electrophysiological findings. In the late 1980s, the application of new histochemical and immunohisto-chemical methods led to a deeper insight into existing correlations between the nomenclatures. As a uniform terminology of the thalamus is still lacking, we created a knowledge-based system (thalamus) which gives a comprehensible survey about the most important terminologies. The different nomenclatures are related to each other by organizing them in a component-integral relation. This part-whole relation contains both the knowledge on the subdivisions of the thalamus as well as the knowledge on the correlations between the various nomenclatures.

Keywords:

Terminology - Thalamus - Merologisms - Databases - Stereotaxy
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Schaltenbrand G, Wahren W. Atlas of Stereotaxy of the Human Brain. 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1977
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Lipinski H-G, Struppler A. Knowledge based functional neurosurgery. Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologic in Medizin und Biologie 1993; 02: 50-6.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hassler R. Architectonic organization of the thalamic nuclei. In: Schaltenbrand G, Walker AE. eds. Stereotaxy of the Human Brain. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 1982: 140-80.
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Andrew J, Watkins ES. Human Thalamus and Adjacent Structures. Williams & Wilkins; 1969
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Olszewski J. The Thalamus of the Macaca Malutta. An Atlas for Use with the Stereotaxic Instrument. Basel: Karger; 1952
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Kandel I. Functional and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery. New York: Plenum Press; 1989
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Ohye C. Thalamus. In: Paxinos G. ed. The Human Nervous System. San Diego, London: Academic Press; 1990: 439-68.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Percheron G, Yelnik J, Francois C. Systems of coordinates for stereotactic surgery and cerebral cartography: advantages of ventricular systems in monkeys. J Neurosc Meth 1986; 17: 69-88.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Jones EG. The Thalamus. New York: Plenum Press; 1985
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Waldeyer A. Zwischenhirn, Diencephalon. In: Waldeyer A. ed. Anatomie des Menschen, Band 2, bearbeitet von D. Graf v. Keyser-lingk, 16. neubearb. Auflage. Berlin: de Gruyter; 1993: 330-8.
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Côté RA, Rothwell DJ, Palotay JL, Becket RS, Brochu L. The Systematized Nomenclature of Human and Veterinary Medicine -SNOMED International (4 volumes). College of American Pathologists. April 1993
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Jones EG, Powell TPS. An analysis of the posterior group of thalamic nuclei on the basis of its afferent connections. J Comp Neurol 1972; 143: 185-216.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Lindberg DA, Humphreys BL, McCray AT. The Unified Medical Language System. Meth Inf Med 1993; 32: 281-91.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jones EG. Correlation and revised nomenclature of ventral nuclei in the thalamus of human and monkey. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1990; 54, 55: 1-20.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hirai T, Jones EG. A new parcellation of the human thalamus on the basis of histochemical staining. Brain Res Rev 1989; 14: 1-34.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hirai T, Jones EG. Comparative anatomical study of ventrolateral thalamic mass in humans and monkeys. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1993; 60: 6-16.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Asanuma C, Thach WT, Jones EG. Distribution of cerebellar terminations and their relation to other afferent terminations in the ventral lateral thalamic region of the monkey. Brain Res Rev 1983; 05: 237-65.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Winston ME, Chaffin R, Herrmann D. A taxonomy of part-whole relations. Cognitive Science 1987; 11: 417-44.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Halmos P. Naive Set Theory. New York: Van Mostrand; 1960
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Moore JT. Elements of Abstract Algebra. 2nd ed. London: Collier-Macmillan; 1967
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Cruse DA. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: University Press; 1986
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Burton H, Jones EG. The posterior thalamic region and its cortical projection in New World and Old World monkeys. J Comp Neurol 1976; 168: 249-302.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Albe-Fessard D, Berkley KJ, Kxuger L, Ralston HJ, Willis Jr WD. Diencephalic mechanisms of pain sensation. Brain Res Rev 1985; 09: 217-96.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Niemann K, Naujokat C, Pohl G, Wollner C, Von Keyserlingk D. Verification of the Schaltenbrand and Wahren stereotactic atlas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1994; 129: 72-81.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar