Methods Inf Med 1994; 33(03): 250-253
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1635024
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Health Informatics – A Scientific Challenge?

J. R. Moehr
1   School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 February 2018 (online)

Abstract:

The paper attempts to derive directions for research and teaching in health informatics. To this end, the achievements and continuing challenges of health informatics are exemplified, categorized, and related to common underlying phenomena. Suggestions by Blum and Blois are adopted which point to the complexity of health information as the critical ingredient. Examples are given of current efforts directed at dealing with this complexity. According to Popper and Brookes one may have to search for yet other ways of dealing specifically with information; we have barely started to explore these. It is suggested that this requirement for a fundamentally different orientation has profound consequences not only for our research but also for our teaching.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Blum B. Clinical Information Systems. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1986
  • 2 Blois MS. Information and Medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1984
  • 3 Humphreys BL, Lindberg DAB. The Unified Medical language System Project: A distributed experiment in improving access to biomedical information. In: Lun KC, Degoulet P, Piemme TE, Rienhoff O. eds. MEDINFO 92. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ Comp; 1992: 1496-1500.
  • 4 Yang Y, Chute CG. A schematic analysis of the Unified Medical Language System. In: Proceedings Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care 1991; 204-8.
  • 5 Cimino JJ, Johnson SB, Hripcsak G. et al. One years’ experience with the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) in academia and patient care. In: Lun KC, Degoulet P, Piemme TE, Rienhoff O. eds. MEDINFO 92. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ Comp; 1992: 1501-5.
  • 6 Tuttle MS, Nelson SJ, Fuller LF. et al. The semantic foundations of the UMLS thesaurus. In: Lun KC, Degoulet P, Piemme TE, Rienhoff O. eds. MEDINFO 92. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ Comp; 1992: 1506-11.
  • 7 Brodnik M, Johns ML. eds. Standards for Clinical Information Processing (Special issue on topics in health record management). Gaithersburg: Aspen Publ; 1991
  • 8 Hripcsak G. Arden Syntax for Medical Logic Modules. MD Comput 1991; 08: 76-8.
  • 9 Hartley RVL. Transmission of information. Bell Syst Techn J 1928; 07: 535.
  • 10 Shannon CE. The mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Techn J 1948; 27: 379-423.
  • 11 Shannon CE, Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: Univ of Illinois Press; 1949
  • 12 Popper KR. Objective Knowledge; An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1972
  • 13 Brookes BC. The foundations of information science. Part I. Philosophical aspects. J Inform Sci 1980; 02: 125-33.
  • 14 Brookes BC. The foundations of information science. Part II. Quantititative aspects: Classes of things and the challenge of human individuality. J Inform Sci 1980; 02: 209-11.
  • 15 Brookes BC. The foundations of information science. Part III. Quantitative aspects: Objective maps and subjective landscapes. J Inform Sci 1980; 02: 269-75.
  • 16 Brookes BC. The foundations of information science. Part IV. Information science: The changing paradigm. J Inform Sci 1981; 03: 3-12.
  • 17 Ducrot H, Martin E, Scherrer JR. Nouvelles Technologies et Traitement de [‘Information en Médecine. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1991
  • 18 Kluge EHW. Advanced patient records: some ethical and legal considerations touching medical information space. Meth Inform Med 1993; 32: 95-103.