Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 1993; 32(05): 418-420
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634957
Review Paper
Schattauer GmbH

Revising a Display of Multidimensional Laboratory Measurements to Improve Accuracy of Perception

D. C. Hoaglin
1   Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge MA, USA
› Author AffiliationsThe author thanks Catherine Berkey and Frederick Mosteller for helpful comments and suggestions on earlier drafts. This work received support under grant HS-05936 from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

To display multidimensional laboratory measurements, Hoeke et al. (1991) proposed a technique that uses plotting axes radiating from a point, assigns each test to a separate axis, and links the test results with line segments. A special nonlinear scaling ensures that a patient whose results all fall in the normal range is represented by a regular polygon of middle size, and colored zones emphasize more serious departures from the normal range. Results of research in graphical perception, however, point to potential difficulties in clinical applications. Those results also suggest a revision of the display that should overcome the difficulties. The new version plots the test results on parallel horizontal lines and links the points for adjacent tests by line segments, while retaining the special scaling and the colored bands.

Key-Words

Clinical Laboratory - Graphical Perception - Graphical Representation
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Cleveland WS, McGill R. Graphical perception and graphical methods for analyzing scientific data. Science 1985; 229: 828-33.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Cleveland WS. The Elements of Graphing Data. Monterey CA: Wadsworth Advanced Books and Software; 1985
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Hoeke JOO, Gelsema ES, Wulkan RW, Leijnse B. Graphical non-linear representation of multi-dimensional laboratory measurements in their clinical context. Meth Inform Med 1991; 30: 138-44.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar