Total Quality in Information Systems Management: Issues for the Health Care Industry

Abstract

Faced with rising costs, growing demand and declining funding, hospitals and others must either cut services or improve the efficiency and effectiveness of what they do. Neither solution can be implemented without adequate relevant information. Without understanding which services are providing the most value to its customers, sensible cutbacks will be difficult to make. Improving efficiency requires a knowledge of where there are inefficiencies, and improving effectiveness requires an understanding of what the outcomes of health care are. The solution, as many have documented, is to create, as a first step, a database containing detailed health care patient data. In this paper, we present continuous improvement techniques as a requirement for the design and development ofthis much needed database.

Keywords

Systems Design - Quality Management - Decision-Support Systems

• REFERENCES

• 1 Boyle W, Reinbold L. Survey: emerging trends in information technology. Healthcare Computing and Communications Canada, 1995; 9 (4) 56-8.
• 2 Clemmer J. Process re-engineering and process improvement: not an either/or choice. CMA Magazine, June, 1988; 36-9.
• 3 Cross MA. CIOs tell CEOs how to make the most of their information systems. Healthcare Executive, 1996; 11 (2) 6-10.
• 4 Goodhue DL. Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Science, 1995; 41 (12) 1827-44.
• 5 Jirsch D. Patient-focused care: the systemic implications of change. Healthcare Management Forum, 1993; 6 (4) 27-32.
• 6 Leonard KJ. Newell Kelly C, LeBlanc J, Van Deursen J. A proposal for a centralized patient record database: the need to identify patient data elements to measure costs, clinical outcomes and benchmarking. International Journal of Technology Management – Special Issue on Health Care 1998; 15: 391-401.
• 7 Leonard KJ. A discussion on the relationship between information systems and total quality management in the credit scoring industry. Credit Research Digest. October, 1-4 (1994).
• 8 Leonard KJ. The development of credit scoring quality measures for credit applications. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 1995; 12 (4) 79-85.
• 9 Leonard KJ. Information systems and benchmarking in the credit scoring industry. International Journal of Benchmarking for Quality Management and Technology, 1996; 3 (1) 36-42.
• 10 Mercer K, Roach G, Leonard KJ. The missing piece of the long term care reform puzzle – the community health information network. Health Law in Canada, 1996; 16 (4) 114-20.
• 11 Minard BF. Protecting patient confidentiality. Healthcare Executive, 1996; 11 (2) 12-6.
• 12 Poljak A.. Role of a computer-based patient record in outcomes research. 1995 Conference on Health Policy Research. Boston, Massachusetts: December 2-3 (1995).
• 13 Robinson D. Ownership of health data: principles for health information networks (part 2). Healthcare Computing and Communications Canada, 1995; 9 (3) 63-6.
• 14 Samuelson D. Diagnosing the real health care villain. OR/MS Today, February, 26 (1995).
• 15 Seaton B.. Health information: overcoming our insecurities. Healthcare Computing and Communications Canada. 1995; 9 (3) 53-5.
• 16 Skelton-Green J. The MIS guidelines: a critical analysis of their strengths and limitations (part II). Healthcare Computing and Communications Canada, 1995; 9 (4) 70-4.
• 17 Sulkers PR. The high performance team: healthcare's powershift – part VII. Healthcare Computing and Communications Canada, 1995; 9 (4) 12-5.
• 18 Sutherland RW, Fulton MJ. Health care in Canada: A description and analysis of Canadian health services. Ottawa: Health Group; (1988).