Methods Inf Med 1998; 37(02): 171-178
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634520
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Tailoring Communications for Primary Care Settings

B. K. Rimer
1   Duke University Medical Center, Durham NC, USA
,
B. Glassman
2   National Cancer Institute, Bethesda Md, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 February 2018 (online)

Abstract

In more and more medical settings, physicians have less and less time to be effective communicators. To be effective, they need accurate, current information about their patients. Tailored health communications can facilitate positive patient-provider communications and foster behavioral changes conducive to health. Tailored communications (TCs) are produced for an individual based on information about that person. The focus of this report is on tailored print communications (TPCs). TPCs also enhance the process of evaluation, because they require a database and the collection of patient-specific information. We present a Tailoring Model for Primary Care that describes the steps involved in creating TPCs. We also provide examples from three ongoing studies in which TPCs are being used in order to illustrate the kinds of variables used for tailoring the products that are developed and how evaluation is conducted. TPCs offer opportunities to expand the reach of health professionals and to give personalized, individualized massages in an era of shrinking professional contact time.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Prochaska JO, Goldstein MG. Process of smoking cessation: Implications for clinicians. Clin Chest Med 1991; 12 (4) 727-35.
  • 2 Harris L. Differences that make a difference. In: Harris L. ed. Health and The New Media. New Jersey: Erlbaum; 1995
  • 3 Smigel K. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1994 86. (17)
  • 4 Voelker R. Personalized messages invite more mammography [news]. J Am Med Assoc 1994; 271 (10) 733-5.
  • 5 Vickery D. Demand management, self-care, and the new media. In: Harris L. ed. Health and The New Media. New Jersey: Erlbaum; 1995: 45-65.
  • 6 Wennberg J. Shared decision making and multimeda. In: Harris L. ed. Health and The New Media. New Jersey: Erlbaum; 1995: 109-12.
  • 7 Woolf Brian P. Customer Specific Marketing. New York: Rand McNally; 1992
  • 8 Skinner CS, Strecher VJ, Hospers H. Physician recommendations for mammography: Do tailored messages make a difference?. Am J Public Health 1994; 84 (1) 43-9.
  • 9 Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Velicer WF, Rossi JS. Standardized, individualized, interactive and personalized selfhelp programs for smoking cessation. Health Psychol 1993; 12 (5) 399-405.
  • 10 Strecher VJ, Kreuter MW, DenBoer CH, Kobrin SC, Hospers HJ, Skinner CS. The effects of computer-tailored smoking cessation messages in family practice settings. J Fam Pract 1994; 39 (1) 262-70.
  • 11 Campbell MK, DeVellis BM, Strecher VJ, Ammerman AS, DeVellis RF, Sandler RS. The impact of message tailoring on dietary behavior change for disease prevention in primary care settings. Am J Public Health 1994; 84 (5) 783-7.
  • 12 Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ. Changing inaccurate perception of health risk: results from a randomized trial. Health Psychol 1995; 14 (1) 56-63.
  • 13 Brug J, Steenhuis I, Van Assema P, De Vries H. The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. Prev Med 1996; 25: 236-42.
  • 14 Rimer BK. Mammography use in the U.S.: Trends and the impact of interventions. Ann of Behav Med 1995; 14 (4) 317-26.
  • 15 Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Evers KE. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK. eds. Health Behavior and Health Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers,; 1996: 60-84.
  • 16 Rimer BK, Conaway MR, Lyna PR, Rakowski W, Woods-Powell CT, Tessaro I, Yarnall K, Barber LT. Cancer screening practices among women in a community health center population. Am J Prev Med 1996; 12 (5) 351-7.
  • 17 Tessaro I, Lyna PR, Rimer BK, Heisler J, Woods-Powell CT, Yarnall KSJ, Barber LT. Readiness to change smoking behavior in a community health center population. J Comm Health. (in press).
  • 18 Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D. et al. A strong candidate for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 1994; 266: 66-71.
  • 19 McGinnis JM, Deering MJ. Patrick Public health information and the new media. In: Harris L. ed. Health and the New Media. New Jersey: Erlbaum; 1995: 127-45.
  • 20 Consumer Health Informatics. United States General Accounting Office. Washington, DC: July 1996
  • 21 Henderson J. Meditation on the new media and professional education. In: Harris L. ed. Health and the New Media. New Jersey: Erlbaum; 1995: 185-209.
  • 22 Tuttle MS, Nelson SJ. A poor precedent. Meth Inform Med 1996; 35: 211-7.