Integrating Genomics into Health Information Systems

Summary

Objective: To outline the main issues related to the impact of the data generated by the Human Genome Project on health information systems. A major challenge for medical informatics is identified, consisting of adapting traditional systems to new genetic-based diagnostic and therapeutic tools. Methods: Reviewing and analysing the different health information levels from an organisational complexity point of view. A model is proposed to explain the interactions between health informatics, bioinformatics and molecular medicine.

Results: We suggest a new framework that integrates genetic data into health information systems. Using this model, new topics for future research and development are identified.

Conclusions: We are witnessing the birth of a new era (post-genomics). In this era technological advancements in genomics offer new opportunities for clinical applications. Medical informaticians should play an important role in this new endeavour.

Keywords

Health informatics - bioinformatics - medical informatics - genomics - genetic information

• References

• 1 Martin-Sanchez F. Bioinformatics and Health: Impacts of the Human Genome Project on Health Informatics. In: Upgrade-Cepis. The European Online Magazine for the IT Professional – IT and the Transformation of Health Care 2001 Vol. II, Issue no.1.
• 2 Collins FS. Shattuck Lecture – “Medical and Societal Consequences of the Human Genome Project”. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 28-37.
• 3 Collins FS, McKusick VA. Implications of the Human Genome Project for medical science. JAMA 2001; 285: 540-4.
• 4 Krauthammer.. Medical Informatics in 10 Years: Towards Biomedical Informatics and its subspecialties. Columbia University. Available at www.cpmc.columbia.edu/homepages/mik9004/MI_future.html Accessed Sept 30 2001
• 5 Martin-Sanchez F, Lopez-Campos G. Biochips based technologies. Applications in clínical diagnosis and biomedical research. II International Symposium on Genetic Diagnosis in Medicine. Madrid; Spain: 1998
• 6 Housman D. Why pharmacogenomics? Why now?. Nat Biotechnol 1998; 16: 492.
• 7 Friend HF. How DNA microarrays and expression profiling will affect clinical practice. BMJ 1999; 319: 1-2.
• 8 Altman R. Bioinformatics in support of molecular medicine. In: Chute CG. (Ed) AMIA Annual Symposium 1998. Orlando: 53-61.
• 9 Kulikowski C. Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics: Discovering and connecting diverse islands o.f researchers and knowledge. In MEDINFO 2001 Patel V. et al. (eds) Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2001: 1515.
• 10 Ibarrola N, Maojo V, López-Campos G, Martin-Sanchez F. Integration of Genetic Information in the computerized clinical record. EUROREC 99 - III European Congress on computerized clinical records. 1999. Seville; Spain.:
• 11 Altman R. The Interactions between Clinical Informatics and Bioinformatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000; 7 (Suppl. 05) 439-43.
• 12 Khoury MJ. Human genome epidemiology: translating advances in human genetics into population-based data for medicine and public health. Genet Med 1999; 1: 71-4.
• 13 Altman R. Bioinformatics. In: Shortliffe EH, Perreault LE, Wiederhold G, Fagan LM. (eds). Medical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. New York: Springer Verlag; 2000
• 14 Kohane I. Bioinformatics and Clinical Inform-atics:The Imperative to Collaborate. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000; 7 (Suppl. 05) 439-43.
• 15 Miller P. Opportunities at the Intersection of Bioinformatics and Health Informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000; 7 (Suppl. 05) 431-8.
• 16 Martin-Sanchez F, Maojo V, Babic A. BIOINFOMED. Prospective analysis on the relationships and synergy between medical informatics and bioinformatics. Proposal for the IST Key Action I - V Framework Program of the European Commission, approved for year 2002
• 17 Yu H, Friedman C, Rhzetsky A, Kra P. Representing genomic knowledge in the UMLS semantic network. Proc-AMIA-Symp 1999; 181-5.
• 18 Sander C. Bioinformatics - Challenges in 2001. Bioinformatics 2001; 1 (Suppl. 01) 1-2.
• 19 Rindfleisch TC, Brutlag DL. Directions for clinical research and genomic research into the next decade: implications for informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5 (Suppl. 05) 404-11.
• 20 Sikorski R. et al. Genomic Medicine, Internet resources for medical genetics. J Am Med Assoc 1997; 278: 1212-3.
• 21 Martin-Sanchez et al. BIKMAS: A BIoinformatics Knowledge MAnagement System. ISMB (Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology) Congress Heidelberg; Germany: 1999
• 22 Bürckle T, Hain T, Hossain H, Dudeck J, Domann E. Bioinformatics in Medical Practice: What is necessary for a Hospital?. In MEDINFO 2001 Patel V. et al. (eds) Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2001: 951-55.
• 23 Weissleder R, Mahmood U. Molecular Imaging. Radiology 2001; 219: 316-33.
• 24 Tempany C, McNeil B. Advances in Biomedical Imaging. JAMA 2001; 285: 562-7.
• 25 Ellsworth DL, Manolio TA. The Emerging importance of genetics in epidemiologic research III. Bioinformatics and statistical genetics methods. Ann Epidemiol 1999; 9 (Suppl. 04) 207-24.
• 26 Martin-Sanchez F. Closing the circle of health information levels: bioinformatics and public health informatics. Proc. Challenges in medical informatics. IMIA Satellite Workshop. Musen M, and Van Bemmel J. eds Madrid: March 2001
• 27 Maojo V. Martin-Sanchez et al. “Functional definition of the INFOGENMED WORKSTATION: A Virtual laboratory for genomic information management in clinical environments”. AMIA (American Medical Informatics Association) Congress; 1999. Washington, USA.:
• 28 Burgess M, Laberge C, Knoppers B. Bioethics for clinicians: 14. Ethics and genetics in medicine. CMAJ 1998; 158: 1309-13.
• 29 Martin-Sanchez F. Genetics and electronic commerce (e-genetics). Impacts on Health. QUARK; (Journal of Science, Medicine, Communication and Culture). (Monographic number on Internet and the Genome Project) 2000 18. Barcelona. Spain.: