Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2006; 45(02): 225-233
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634055
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Evaluation of the Electronic Transmission of Medical Findings from Hospitals to Practitioners by Triangulation

C. Machan
1   Institute for Health Information Systems, UMIT – University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i. T., Austria
,
E. Ammenwerth
1   Institute for Health Information Systems, UMIT – University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i. T., Austria
,
T. Schabetsberger
1   Institute for Health Information Systems, UMIT – University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i. T., Austria
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: The need for regional, cross-institutional electronic networks in health care is steadily growing to support seamless, cooperative health care. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of electronic transmission between hospitals and practitioners in a Tyrolean health care network, and to derive technical and organizational points for improvement.

Methods: Between March and August 2004 we carried out a triangulation-based cross-sectional study, combining a qualitative study based on semi-structured, problem-centric interviews with selected practitioners, with a quantitative study based on a standardized questionnaire survey of all the Tyrolean practitioners that receive electronic messages. The survey was designed to confirm the hypotheses which have been systematically derived from the interviews.

Results and Conclusions: The results show high satisfaction and positive impact of electronic communication. The triangulation of quantitative and qualitative methods was found to be useful in order to make the definition and confirmation of the hypotheses more transparent.

Keywords

Health informatics - evaluation studies - hospital information systems - triangulation - electronic transmission of findings - regional networks
 

  • References

  • 1 WHO. A Health Telematics Policy, Report of the WHO Group Consultation on Health Telematics December 11-16, 1997. Geneva: World Health Organization, Geneva; 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington:: National Academy Press; 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Sachverständigenrat für die Konzertierte Aktion im Gesundheitswesen. Finanzierung, Nutzerorientierung und Qualität – Band 2: Qualität und Versorgungsstrukturen. Baden-Baden: 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Kuhn K, Guise D. From Hospital Information Systems to Health Information Systems – Problems, Challenges, Perspectives. Methods Inf Med 2000; 40: 275-86.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Moorman PW, Branger P, van der Kam W, van der Lei J. Electronic Messaging Between Primary and Secondary Care: A Four-year Case Report. JAMIA 2001; 8 (04) 372-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Collen MF. General Requirements for a Medical Information System (MIS). Comput Biomed Res 1970; 3 (05) 393-406.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Mageean R. Study of “discharge communications” from hospital. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986; 293 6557 1283-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 van der Kam W, Moorman P, Koppejan-Mulder M. Effects of electronic communication in general practice. Int J Med Inf 2000; 60: 59-70.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ammenwerth E, Haux R, Lechleitner G, Pfeiffer K, Triendl C, Vogl R. TILAK IT-Strategie 2003-2007: Informationsverarbeitung im Dienste von Patientenversorgung und medizinischer Forschung, Tiroler Landeskrankenanstalten Ges. m.b.H (TILAK), Innsbruck. 2003. http://iig. umit.at/projekte/itbeirat/itstrategie.htm
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Schabetsberger T, Haux R, Hirsch B, Kaloczy C, Lechleitner G, Schindelwig K. et al. A patientcentered telemedicine strategy to support shared care in the Tyrol. In: Baud R, Fieschi M, Le Beux P, Ruch P. editors. The New Navigators: from Professionals to Patients. Proceedings of Medical Informatics Europe (MIE 2003), May 4-7, 2003. St. Malo, France.: Amsterdam:: IOS Press; 2003. Proceedings available on CD.
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG. Broadening our approach to evaluating medical information systems. In: Clayton P. editor. 15th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. New York:: McGraw-Hill; 1992: 8-12.
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications – some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int J Med Inform 2001; 64: 39-56.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Stavri P, Ash J. Does failure breed success: narrative analysis of stories about computerized provider order entry. Int J Med Inform 2003; 72 (01) (03) 9-15.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gagnon M, Godin G, Gagne C, Fortin J, Lamothe L, Reinharz D. et al. An adaptation of the theory of interpersonal behaviour to the study of telemedicine adoption by physicians. Int J Med Inform 2003; 71 (02) (03) 103-15.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Greatbatch D, Murphy E, Dingwall R. Evaluating medical information systems: ethnomethodological and interactionist approaches. Health Serv Manage Res 2001; 14 (03) 181-91.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ammenwerth E, Mansmann U, Iller C. Can evaluation studies benefit from a triangulation of quantitative and qualitative methods? A case study. Int J Med Inf 2003; 70 (02) (03) 237-48.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ammenwerth E, Brender J, Nykänen P, Prokosch H-U. Rigby M, Talmon J. Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems – reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck. Int J Med Inf 2004; 73 (06) 479-91.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Denzin N. Strategies of multiple triangulation. In:. Denzin N. editor. The Research Act. Chicago:: Aldine; 1970: 297-331.
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Flick U. Triangulation in der qualitativen Forschung. In: Flick U, Kardoff E, Steinke I. editors. Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch. Reinbek b. Hamburg:: Rowohlt Taschenbuch; 2000: 309-18.
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Mayring M. Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung. Weinheim:: Psychologie-Verlag- Union; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Eval DB. A web-based inventory of evaluation studies in medical informatics 1982-2002, UMIT. http://evaldb.umit.at Last accessed: Jan. 2005
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Branger P, van der Wouden J, Schudel B, Verboog E, Duisterhout J, van der Lei J. et al. Electronic communication between providers of primary and secondary care. BMJ 1992; 305 6861 1068-70.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Branger P, van’t Hooft A, van der Wouden J, Moorman P, van Bemmel J. Shared care for diabetes: supporting communication between primary and secondary care. Int J Med Inform 1999; 53: 133-42.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Greene J, McClintock C. Triangulation in evaluation: Design and analysis issues. Evaluation Review 1985; 9 (05) 523-45.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hyrkas K, Paunonen M. Patient satisfaction and research-related problems (Part 2). Is triangulation the answer?. J Nurs Manag 2000; 8 (04) 237-45.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Begley CM. Using triangulation in nursing research. J Adv Nurs 1996; 24 (01) 122-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Barbour RS. The case for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy 1999; 4 (01) 39-43.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Kaplan B, Duchon D. Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in information systems research: a case study. MIS Quarterly 1988; 12 (04) 571-86.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar