Modeling Interdependencies between Information Processes and Communication Paths in Hospitals

Summary

Objectives: For planning hospital information systems it is important to recognize the interrelation between business processes and the communication needs between supporting application systems. We therefore present an approach to model, visualize and analyze those interdependencies.

Methods: The approach is based on the concepts defined in 3LGM², a meta-model to describe health information systems (HIS). An information process is defined as a sequence of functions using or updating information; a communication path as a sequence of communication links between interfaces belonging to application systems. The search for communication paths belonging to an information process is interpreted as an all-pairs shortest-paths problem. To solve this problem the Floyd-Warshall algorithm is applied.

Results: The resulting algorithm has been implemented as function of the 3LGM² tool, a tool to create 3LGM² compliant models. With it, it is possible to interactively define information processes at the domain layer and to analyze step by step whether the infrastructure at the logical tool layer is sufficient to communicate necessary data between application systems.

Conclusions: The presented approach enables the representation and analysis of dependencies between information processes and communication paths.

With it, the HIS architecture is directly associated with the business needs. This is an important condition for the systematic planning of hospital information systems.

Keywords

Hospital information systems - architectural models - process modeling - information processes - communication paths

• References

• 1 Hammer M, Champy J. Reengineering the corporation. New York:: Harper Business; 1994
• 2 Brodie ML, Stonebraker M. Migrating legacy systems. San Francisco:: Morgan Kaufmann; 1995
• 3 Oberweis A, Scherrer G, Stucky W. INCOME/STAR: Methodology and Tools for the Development of Distributed Information Systems. Information Systems 1994; 19 (08) 643-60.
• 4 Ferstl OK, Sinz EJ. Modeling of Business Systems Using SOM. In: Bernus P, Mertins K, Schmidt G. editors. Handbook on Architectures of In formation Systems. International Handbook on Information Systems. Berlin:: Springer; 1998: 339-58.
• 5 Scheer AW. ARIS Toolset: A Software Product Is Born. Information Systems 1994; 19 (08) 607-24.
• 6 Ball MJ, Douglas JV. Redefining and improving patient safety. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41 (04) 271-6.
• 7 Staccini P, Joubert M. et al. Modelling health care processes for eliciting user requirements: a way to link a quality paradigm and clinical information system design. Int J Med Inf 2001; 64 (02) (03) 129-42.
• 8 Maij E, van Reijswoud VE. et al. A process view of medical practice by modeling communicative acts. Methods Inf Med 2000; 39 (01) 56-62.
• 9 Jerva M. BPR (business process redesign) and systems analysis and design: making the case for integration. Top Health Inf Manage 2001; 21 (04) 30-7.
• 10 Health Level 7. HL7 Reference Information Model V01–20; http://www.hl7.org
• 11 Siegel EL, Channin DS. Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise: a primer. Part 1. Introduction. Radiographics 2001; 21 (05) 1339-41.
• 12 Flanders AE, Carrino JA. Understanding DICOM and IHE. Semin Roentgenol 2003; 38 (03) 270-81.
• 13 Dudeck J. Aspects of implementing and harmonizing healthcare communication standards. Int J Med Inf 1998; 48 (01) (03) 163-71.
• 14 CEN TC251. N-97–024, Healthcare Information System Architecture Part 1 (HISA) Healthcare Middleware Layer – draft. Report no. PrENV12967–1 1997E. Brussels: European Commitee for Standardisation. http://www.centc251.org
• 15 Klingler A. An Open, Component-based Architecture für Healthcare Information Systems. In: Hasman A, Blobel B, Dudeck J, Engelbrecht R, Gell G, Prokosch H-U. editors. Medical Infobahnfor Europe. Amsterdam:: IOS Press; 2000: 997-1001.
• 16 Grimson J, Grimson W. et al. A CORBA-based integration of distributed electronic healthcare records using the synapses approach. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 1998; 2 (03) 124-38.
• 17 Heitmann KU. The Role of Communication Servers in the Architeure of Healthcare Information Systems. In: Dudeck J, Blobel B, Lordieck W, Bürkle T. editors. New Technologies in Hospital Information Systems. Amsterdam:: IOS Press; 1997: 156-62.
• 18 Zachman JA. A framework for information systems architecture (Reprint). IBM systems journal 1999; 38 (02) (03) 454-70.
• 19 Spewak SH, Hill SC. Enterprise Architecture Planning: Developing a blueprint for Data, Applications and Technology. New York:: John Wiley; 1992
• 20 Chief Information Officer Council. A Practical Guide to Federal Enterprise Architecture. Boston: Chief Information Officer Council c/ Rob C. Thomas, U.S. Customs Service 7681 Boston Boulevard Springfield: VA 22153 2001 February 2001. http://www.cio.gov
• 21 Haux R, Seggewies C, Baldauf-Sobez W. et al. Soarian™ – Workflow Applied for Health Care. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42: 25-36.
• 22 Toussaint PJ, Lodder H. Component-based development for supporting workflows in hospitals. Int J Med Inf 1998; 52 (01) (03) 53-60.
• 23 Wong ST, Tjandra D, Wang H, Shen W. Workflowenabled distributed component-based information architecture for digital medical imaging enterprises. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2003; 7 (03) 171-83.
• 24 Degoulet P, Marin L, Lavril M. et al. The HEGP component-based clinical information system. Int J Med Inf 2003; 69 (02) (03) 115-26.
• 25 Xu Y, Sauquet D, Degoulet P, Jaulent MC. Component- based mediation services for the integration of medical application. Artif Intell Med 2003; 27 (03) 283-304.
• 26 Chu S, Cesnik B. A three-tier clinical information systems design model. Int J Med Inf 2000; 57 (02) (03) 91-107.
• 27 Maij E, Toussaint PJ, Kalshoven M, Poerschke M, Zwetsloot-Schonk JHM. Use Cases and DEMO: aligning functional features of ICT infrastructure to business processes. Int J Med Inf 2002; 65: 179-191.
• 28 Kuhn KA, Giuse DA. From Hospital Information Systems to Health Information Systems. Methods Inf Med 2001; 40: 275-87.
• 29 Winter A, Brigl B, Wendt T. Modeling Hospital Information Systems (Part 1): The Revised Three- Layer Graph-Based Meta Model 3LGM2. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42 (05) 544-51.
• 30 Ammenwerth E, Buchauer A, Haux R. A Requirements Index for Information Processing in Hospitals. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41 (04) 282-8.
• 31 Cormen TH, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL, Stein C. Introduction to algorithms. Cambridge:: MIT Press; 2001
• 32 Wendt T, Häber A, Brigl B, Winter A. Modeling Hospital Information Systems (Part 2): Using the 3LGM2 Tool for Modeling Patient Record Management. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43 (03) 256-67.
• 33 Scheer AW. ARIS Toolset: A Software Product Is Born. Information Systems 1994; 19 (08) 607-24.
• 34 Pitt M. A Generalized Simulation System to Support Strategic Resource Planning In Healthcare. In: Andradóttir S, Healy KJ, Withers DH, Nelson BL. Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference. 1997: 1155-1162. http://www.informs-cs.org/wsc97papers/1155.PDF (Last visit: February 8, 2005)
• 35 Winter A, Brigl B, Heller O, Mueller U, Struebing A, Wendt T. Supporting Information Management for Regional Health Information Systems by Models with Communication Path Analysis. In: 2004 IDEAS Workshop on Medical Information Systems: The Digital Hospital (IDEAS-DH 2004). IEEE Computer Society: 2004: 139-46.