Advanced EHR Architectures–Promises or Reality

Summary

Objectives: Forming the informational reflection of the patients and their care, the Electronic Health Record (EHR) is the core application of any complex health information system or health network. Such an ideally lifelong history file must be reliable, flexible, adaptable to new concepts and technologies, and robust, to allow for sharing knowledge over its lifetime. A sophisticated architecture must be chosen for meeting this challenge.

Methods: An advanced EHR architecture for designing and implementing future-proof EHR systems must be a model of generic properties required for any Electronic Patient Record to provide communicable, comprehensive, useful, effective, and legally binding records that preserve their integrity over the time, independent of platforms and systems as well as of national special-ties. The resulting approach is based on the ISO Reference Model – Open Distributed Processing.

Results: Based on advanced architectural principles introduced in the paper, a new generation of EHR systems has been designed and implemented for demonstrating the feasibility of the approach. This result is presented and evaluated regarding the achievements and problems using the component-based paradigm of model-driven health information system architectures.

Conclusions: The future-proof EHR approach that has been established has been shortly evaluated. Advantages regarding flexibility, reliability, and portability of policy-driven, highly secure, role-dependent applications have to be considered in the light of performance as well as of the availability of network and application services.

Keywords

Electronic health record - meta-languages - components - model-driven architecture

• References

• 1 CEN ENV 13606 “Electronic Healthcare Record Communication”.
• 2 Beale T. A Model Universe for Health Information Standards. 2003 http://www.deepthought.com.au
• 3 Blobel B. Application of the component paradigm for analysis and design of advanced health system architectures. Int J Med Inf 2000; 60 (03) 281-301.
• 4 Blobel B. Analysis, Design and Implementation of Secure and Interoperable Distributed Health Information Systems. Series Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Vol. 89. Amsterdam:: IOS Press; 2002
• 5 Blobel B, Holena M. Comparison, Evaluation, and Possible Harmonisation of the HL7, DHE, and CORBA Middleware. In: Dudeck J, Blobel B, Lordieck W, Bürkle T. New Technologies in Hospital Information Systems. Series Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Vol. 89. Amsterdam:: IOS Press; 1997: 40-7.
• 6 ISO/IEC 10746-2 “Information technology – Open Distributed Processing – Reference Model”.
• 7 Siegel J. Quick CORBA3. Wiley Computer Publishing. New York, Chichester, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,; 2001
• 8 HARP Consortium. http://www.ist-harp.org
• 9 SNOMED International. http://www.snomed.org
• 10 United States National Library of Medicine. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/
• 11 openEHR Foundation. http://www.openEHR.org
• 12 CEN EN 13606 “Health informatics – EHR communication”.
• 13 CEN EN 12967 “Health informatics – Health information systems architecture”.
• 14 Health Level 7, Inc.: http://www.hl7.org
• 15 Vlachos M, Stassinopoulos G. Open, flexible and portable secure Web based health applications. In: Blobel B, Pharow P. Advanced Health Telematics and Telemedicine. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. Amsterdam:: IOS Press; 2003. 96 41-50.
• 16 CEN TC 251 ENV 13729 “Health informatics – Secure user identification – Strong authentication using microprocessor cards (SEC-ID/CARDS)”, 1999
• 17 ISO DTS 17090 “Public Key Infrastructure, Part 1-3” 2001
• 18 World Wide Web Consortium. XML specifications. http://www.w3c.org