Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18(01): 26-30
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632924
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Third metacarpal bone mineral density assessment in the standing horse by dual X-ray absorptiometry

Suitability, precision and accuracy
M. Donabedian
1   Department of Human Nutrition and Food Safety, INRA, St Genes-Champanelle, France
2   Department of Animal Science, INRA, St Genes Champanelle, France
,
C. Delguste
3   Clinical Science Department, University Liège, Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium
,
G. Perona
4   Department of Animal Production, Faculty Veterinary Medicine, University Torino, Italy
,
P. Lebecque
1   Department of Human Nutrition and Food Safety, INRA, St Genes-Champanelle, France
,
F. Duboeuf
5   INSERM U 403, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
,
O. Lepage
6   Equine Department, National Veterinary School Lyon, Marcy l'Etoile, France
,
W. Martin-Rosset
2   Department of Animal Science, INRA, St Genes Champanelle, France
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 09 February 2004

Accepted 16 July 2004

Publication Date:
08 February 2018 (online)

Preview

Summary

Bone mineral density (BMD) is correlated to mechanical properties of bone. In the horse, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has yet only been performed ex-vivo, but a new portable DXA device would be ideal for in-vivo BMD measurement. We explored field suitability, precision and accuracy of this device for in-vivo third metacarpal density assessment. Precision was analysed by calculating measurement variation under repeated measurement tests with (reproducibility) and without (repeatability) limb repositioning. Repeatability and reproducibility were tested ex-vivo, at the same time that intra- and inter-operator reproducibility were assessed in-vivo. In order to test accuracy, bone mineral content (BMC) of several bone samples determined by DXA and ashing were compared. Repeatability was 1.47% and reproducibility 1.69% ex-vivo. In-vivo reproducibility varied between 2.91 and 4.06% for intraoperator test and between 3.13 and 5.53% for interoperator test. BMC measured by DXA and ash weight were highly correlated (R2>0.99). In conclusion, under described conditions this DXA device is usable, accurate and precise. Its sensitiveness reaches 8.23% in an individual longitudinal monitoring. Using the third metacarpal bone as an example, we have shown that this device is suitable for experimental or clinical monitoring.