Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1997; 10(02): 111-116
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632579
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Detection of Stress-Generated Potentials in Fracture Callus

S. C. Roe
1   From the Department of Companion Animal and Special Species Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine and the North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
,
P. J. Marsico
2   Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received for publication 12 June 1996

Publication Date:
22 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Stress generated potentials (SGPs) are present in cortical bone and are thought to contribute to osteocyte perception of load. Because callus also develops and remodels in response to mechanical stimulus, SGPs may be the signaling mechanism in this tissue. The feasibility of the measurement of SGPs in fracture callus was investigated in this study. Osteotomies were performed on the right ulna of 15 Mongrel dogs and allowed to heal without fixation. The ulnae were harvested at six, 12, and 18 weeks; each callus instrumented with electrodes and SGPs recorded during broad band dynamic vibrational excitation. The results of these measurements indicate that SGPs can be detected in fracture callus. Refinement of the measurement techniques may lead to a better understanding of these potentials and how they change with load magnitude and stage of healing. Understanding of SGPs in vivo may also contribute to development of electromagnetic fracture healing stimulation methodologies.

Stress generated potentials (SGPs) are a probable mechanism through which cells in cortical bone sense and respond to load. In this study, SGPs were identified in fracture callus, a tissue that also responds to load by remodeling. Further study of these potentials may assist in the development of methods for stimulation of fracture healing.

This material was presented at the American College of Veterinary Surgeous Magazine Meeting, Washington, DC, October, 1994.

Keywords

Streaming potentials - callus - bone
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Bassett CAL, Schink-Ascani M, Lewis SM. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on Steinberg ratings of femoral head osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop 1989; 246: 172-84.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Buschmann MD, Grodzinsky AJ. A molecular model of proteoglycan-associated electrostatic forces in cartilage mechanics. J Biomech Eng 1995; 117: 179-92.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cochran GVB, Pawluk RJ, Basset CAL. Electromechanical characteristics of bone under physiologic moisture conditions. Clin Orthop 1968; 58: 249-70.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 DeCamp CE, Hauptman J, Knowlen G, Reindel JF. Periosteum and the healing of partial ulnar ostectomy in radius curvus of dogs. Vet Surg 1986; 15: 185-90.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Einhorn TA. Enhancement of fracture-healing. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995; 77: 940-56.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gross D, Williams WS. Streaming potential and the electromechanical response of physiologically- moist bone. J Biomech 1982; 15: 277-95.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Guzelsu N, Walsh WR. Streaming potential of intact wet bone. J Biomech 1990; 23: 673-85.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Johnson MW. The electromechanical effect in bone. 1977. Ph.D. Thesis; University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois:
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Johnson MW, Chakkalakal DA, Harper RA, Katz JL. Comparison of the electromechanical effects in wet and dry bone. J Biomech 1980; 13: 437-42.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kufahl RH, Saha S. A theoretical model for stress-generated fluid flow in the canaliculilacunae network in bone tissue. J Biomech 1990; 23: 171-80.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 LeBlanc A, Schneider V, Evans H. et al. Bone mineral loss and recovery after 17 weeks of bed rest. J Bone Min Res 1990; 5: 843-50.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Otter M, Shoenung J, Williams WS. Evidence for different sources of stress-generated potentials in wet and dry bone. J Orthop Res 1985; 3: 321-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Pollack SR, Salzstein R, Pienkowski D. Streaming potentials in fluid-filled bone. Ferroelectrics 1984; 60: 297-309.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rahn BA. Bone healing: Histologic and physiologic concepts. In: Bone in Clinical Orthopaedics. Sumner-Smith G. (ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders; 1982: 335-86.
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Rubin CT, McLeod KJ, Lanyon LE. Prevention of osteoporosis by pulsed electromagnetic fields. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1989; 71: 411-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rubin J, McLeod KJ, Titus L. et al. Formation of osteoclast-like cells is suppressed by low frequency, low intensity electric fields. J Orthop Res 1996; 14: 7-15.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Schenk RK, Müller J, Willenegger H. Nonunion: The histologic picture. In: Bone in Clinical Orthopaedics. Sumner- Smith G. (ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders; 1982: 415-27.
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Shahidi AV, Guardo R, Savard P. Electrical impedance tomography: Computational analysis based on finite element models of the human thorax with cylindrical and realistic geometry's. Ann Biomed Eng 1995; 23: 61-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Singh S, Saha S. Electrical properties of bone: A review. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1984; 186: 249-71.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Williams WS. Sources of piezoelectricity in tendon and bone. Crit Rev Bioeng 1974: 95-118.
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Williams WS, Johnson M, Gross D. Piezoelectric description of strain-related potentials from whole bone and single osteons. In: Electrical Properties of Bone and Cartilage. Brighton CT, Black J, Pollack SR. (eds). New York: Grune & Stratton; 1979: 83-93.
    Google Scholar