Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1996; 09(03): 106-10
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632513
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Acute Failure Characteristics of Six Methods for Internal Fixation of Canine Femoral Oblique Fractures

R. Nye
1   From the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
,
E. Egger
1   From the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
,
J. Huhta
2   Department of Engineering, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
,
M. Histand
2   Department of Engineering, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
,
C. Mallinckrodt
3   Department of Statistics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received for publication 10 August 1996

Publication Date:
23 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

A long oblique osteotomy model of canine femoral fractures was created to compare six methods of internal fixation. The following methods were tested: three cerclage wires, three lag screws, eight-hole dynamic compression plate attached with six cerclage wires, eight-hole dynamic compression plate attached with six cortical screws, eight-hole dynamic compression plate attached with six cortical screws superimposed over three cerclage wires, and an eight-hole dynamic compression plate attached with six cortical screws superimposed over three lag screws. The repaired femurs were mounted in a mechanical testing machine in an orientation designed to mimic physiological loading. Axial compression was applied which resulted in the test specimens experiencing simultaneous compressive and bending forces. The effects of the method of osteotomy repair, bone temperature, and bone diameter were analyzed. The maximum load and the stiffness of the composite fixation and bones were determined. There were not any statistically significant differences in stiffness among the groups. All fixation methods, in which plates were attached with screws, resulted in significantly greater maximum load values than treatment techniques where plates were not used. None of the fixation methods attained a mean maximum load greater than 58% of the mean maximum load of the control femurs.

Six methods of commonly used internal fixation methods are compared. A method of in vitro positioning of test femurs to mimic in vivo orientation is presented. Maximum load capabilities of fixation do not significantly increase with the addition of interfragmentary compression to plate fixation.

Keywords

Internal fixation - test positioning - oblique osteotomy - maximum load
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Young DJ, Probst CW. Methods of internal fracture fixation. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Slatter DH. ed Philadelphia: Saunders; 1992: 1610-40.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Brinker WO, Piermattei DL, Flo GL. Handbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics and Fracture Management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1990: 3-58.
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Prieur WD, Sumner-Smith G. Fundamental principles of the AO/ASIF method. In: Manual of Internal Fixation in Small Animals. Brinker WO, Hohn RB, Prieur WO. eds Berlin: Springer; 1984: 3-126.
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Boudrieau RJ. Principles of screw and plate fixation. Sem in Vet Med and Surg (SA) 1991; 6: 75-89.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Piermattei DL. Practical orthopaedics of the long bones and lower forelimb. AAHA Proceedings 1978; 369-80.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bojrab MJ. Disease Mechanisms in Small Animal Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1992: 1009-25.
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Sisson, Grossman. The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1975: 53-73.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Miller, Malcom. Anatomy of the Dog. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1964: 236-42.
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Alexander RM. The mechanics of jumping by a dog (canis familiaris). Journal of Zoology, London 1974; 173: 549-73.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Adrian MJ, Roy WE, Kurpovich PV. Normal gait of the dog: An electrogoniometric study. Am J Vet Res 1966; 27: 90-95.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hulse D, Hyman B. Fracture biology and biomechanics. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Slatter DH. ed., vol 2 Philadelphia: Saunders; 1992: 1595-1603.
    Google Scholar
  • 12 SAS users guide 1988. SAS Inst. Inc. Gary, NC. Ames: State College Press;
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Steele, Torre. Principles and Procedures in Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980
    Google Scholar
  • 14 DeYoung DJ, Probst CW. Methods of internal fracture fixation. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery, vol 2. Slatter DH. ed Philadeliphia: Saunders; 1992: 1631
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Walter MC, Lenehan TM, Smith GK, Matthiessen DT, Newton CD. Treatment of severely comminuted diaphyseal fractures in the dog, using standard bone plates and autogenous cancellous bone graft to span fracture gaps: 11 cases (1979-1983). JAVMA 1986; 189: 457-62.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hulse DA, Aron DN. Advances in Small Animal Orthopaedics. The Compendium, July 1994; 831-32.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Burstein AH, Currey J, Frankel VH. et al Bone strength. The effect of screw holes. J Bone Joint Surg 1972; 54 A 1143-56.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Blass CE, Piermattei DL, Withrow SJ, Scott RJ. Static and dynamic cerclage wire analysis. Vet Surg 1986; 15: 181-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Wilson JW, Belloli DM, Robbins T. Resistance of cerclage to knot failure. JAVMA 1985; 187: 389-91.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Rooks RL, Tarvin GB, Pijanowski GJ, Daly WB. In vitro cerclage wire analysis. Vet Surg 1982; 11: 39-43.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar