J Hand Microsurg 2018; 10(01): 029-036
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1630142
Original Article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Thoracoumbilical Flap: Anatomy, Technique, and Clinical Applications in Upper Limb Reconstruction in the Era of Microvascular Surgery

Ravikiran Naalla
1   Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Burns Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
,
Moumita De
1   Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Burns Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
,
Rakesh Dawar
1   Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Burns Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
,
Shashank Chauhan
1   Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Burns Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
,
Maneesh Singhal
1   Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Burns Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 03 November 2017

Accepted: 02 December 2017

Publication Date:
20 March 2018 (online)

Abstract

Purpose Microvascular reconstruction is the standard of care for salvage of soft tissue defects in complex upper extremity due to their distinct advantages over the pedicled flaps. However, in the era of microsurgery, pedicled flaps have an acceptable significant role for reconstruction of complex soft tissue defects. The authors aim to demonstrate the versatility of pedicled thoracoumbilical flap (TUF) in selected clinical scenarios.

Patients and Methods Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent TUF for upper limb posttraumatic reconstruction was performed between January 2016 and October 2017. The demographic details, etiology, wound parameters, clinical circumstances, and complications were recorded.

Results Ten patients were included in the retrospective case series. Out of them, nine of the patients had critical issues, which justified a pedicled TUF over free flap. The critical issues were severe comorbid illnesses (n = 3), the paucity of recipient vessels (n = 1), salvage of hand replant and revascularization (n = 2), circumferential degloving injury to the multiple fingers and palm (n = 1), coverage for metacarpal hand (n = 1), and extensive scarring at the surgical site (n = 1). Mean age was 34.4 years (range: 11–70 years), six of them were males, and four were females. Two patients had infections resulting in wound gaping. One of the patients had flap tip necrosis.

Conclusion Pedicled flaps have a significant acceptable role in this era of microsurgery, and a pedicled TUF is a versatile option for coverage of complex soft tissue defects of the forearm, wrist, hand, and fingers.

Level of Evidence This is a level IV, therapeutic, and retrospective study.

 
  • References

  • 1 Sabapathy SR, Bajantri B. Indications, selection, and use of distant pedicled flap for upper limb reconstruction. Hand Clin 2014; 30 (02) 185-199
  • 2 O'Shaughnessy KD, Rawlani V, Hijjawi JB, Dumanian GA. Oblique pedicled paraumbilical perforator-based flap for reconstruction of complex proximal and mid-forearm defects: a report of two cases. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35 (07) 1105-1110
  • 3 Mishra S, Sharma RK. The pedicled thoraco-umbilical flap: a versatile technique for upper limb coverage. Indian J Plast Surg 2009; 42 (02) 169-175
  • 4 Taylor GI, Corlett R, Boyd JB. The extended deep inferior epigastric flap: a clinical technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72 (06) 751-765
  • 5 Taylor GI, Corlett RJ, Boyd JB. The versatile deep inferior epigastric flap. Br J Plast Surg 1984; 37: 330-350
  • 6 El-Mrakby HH, Milner RH. The suprafascial course of the direct paraumbilical perforator vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (05) 1766-1768
  • 7 Slavin SA, Upton J, Kaplan WD, Van den AbbeeleAD. An investigation of lymphatic function following free-tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (03) 730-741
  • 8 Wang HD, Alonso-Escalante JC, Cho BH, DeJesus RA. Versatility of free cutaneous flaps for upper extremity soft tissue reconstruction. J Hand Microsurg 2017; 9 (02) 58-66
  • 9 Horta R, Silva P, Costa-Ferreira A, Amarante JM, Silva A. Microsurgical soft-tissue hand reconstruction: an algorithm for selection of the best procedure. J Hand Microsurg 2011; 3 (02) 73-77
  • 10 Al-Qattan MM, Al-Qattan AM. Defining the indications of pedicled groin and abdominal flaps in hand reconstruction in the current microsurgery era. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41 (09) 917-927
  • 11 Segu SS, Athavale SN, Manjunath P. Osteoplastic reconstruction for post traumatic thumb amputations around metacarpophalangeal joint. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9 (08) PC11-PC13
  • 12 Boyd JB, Mackinnon SE. An evaluation of the pedicled thoracoumbilical flap in upper extremity reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1989; 22 (03) 236-242
  • 13 Fan QS. The anatomy and application of the thoracoumbilical flap. Chin J Microsurg 1987; 10: 129-132
  • 14 Fan QS. The thoraco-umbilical flap for a large skin defect on hand and forearm. Chin J Hand Surg 1992; 8: 21-24
  • 15 Zhang XQ, Wang SD, Fan QY, Mao BA, Zhou Y, Zhang MH. Thoracoumbilical flap: experience with 33 cases. J Reconstr Microsurg 2004; 20 (02) 133-137
  • 16 Yilmaz S, Saydam M, Seven E, Ercocen AR. Paraumbilical perforator-based pedicled abdominal flap for extensive soft-tissue deficiencies of the forearm and hand. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54 (04) 365-368
  • 17 Kamath BJ, Verghese T, Bhardwaj P. “Wing flaps”: perforator-based pedicled paraumbilical flaps for skin defects in hand and forearm. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59 (05) 495-500
  • 18 Khandelwal S. An abdominal flap to the same right forearm and the hand following a high-voltage electric burn in a case report. J Clin Diagn Res 2013; 7 (07) 1473-1475
  • 19 Serletti JM, Higgins JP, Moran S, Orlando GS. Factors affecting outcome in free-tissue transfer in the elderly. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (01) 66-70
  • 20 Deganello A, Gallo O, De Cesare JM. et al. Surgical management of surgery and radiation induced peristomal neck ulcerations. B-ENT 2008; 4 (03) 169-174
  • 21 Beausang ES, Ang EE, Lipa JE. et al. Microvascular free tissue transfer in elderly patients: the Toronto experience. Head Neck 2003; 25 (07) 549-553
  • 22 Tizian C, Kunert P, Berger A. [Joint saving forearm replantation using pedicled latissimus dorsi island flap]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 1984; 16 (02) 106-110
  • 23 Hung MH, Huang KF, Chiu HY, Chao WN. Experience in reconstruction for small digital defects with free flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76 (Suppl (01) S48-S54
  • 24 Tare M, Ramakrishnan V. Free ‘mini’ groin flap for digital resurfacing. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009; 34 (03) 336-342
  • 25 Doctor AM, Mathew J, Ellur S, Ananthram AA. Three-flap cover for total hand degloving. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (04) e402-e405
  • 26 Fujiwara M, Fukamizu H. Delayed wraparound abdominal flap reconstruction for a totally degloved hand. Hand Surg 2008; 13 (02) 115-119
  • 27 Kim KS, Kim ES, Kim DY, Lee SY, Cho BH. Resurfacing of a totally degloved hand using thin perforator-based cutaneous free flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 50 (01) 77-81
  • 28 Wei FC, Seah CS, Chen HC, Chuang CC. Functional and esthetic reconstruction of a mutilated hand using multiple toe transfers and iliac osteocutaneous flap: a case report. Microsurgery 1993; 14 (06) 388-390
  • 29 Sabapathy SR, Venkatramani H, Bhardwaj P. Reconstruction of the thumb amputation at the carpometacarpal joint level by groin flap and second toe transfer. Injury 2013; 44 (03) 370-375