Nervenheilkunde 2013; 32(11): 866-876
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1628557
Übersichtsartikel
Schattauer GmbH

Neue Hirnstimulationsverfahren in der Psychiatrie

Die tDCS zur Behandlung der DepressionNew brain stimulation methods in psychiatrytDCS for the treatment of depression
U. Palm*
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
,
A. Hasan
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
,
D. Keeser*
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
2   Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
,
T. Bunse
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
,
F. Padberg*
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingegangen am: 29 May 2013

angenommen am: 27 June 2013

Publication Date:
24 January 2018 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Ziel

Die transkranielle Gleichstromstimulation (tDCS) wird in der Behandlung von Depressionen seit einigen Jahren intensiv erforscht. Es soll untersucht werden, welche Schlüsse die Studienlage über den klinischen Einsatz der tDCS in der Behandlung der Depression zulässt.

Material und Methoden

Randomisierte placebokontrollierte klinische Studien, offene Studien, Fallberichte und Übersichtsarbeiten, sämtlich aus der englischsprachigen Fachliteratur, wurden in einer systematischen und umfangreichen Literaturrecherche ausgewertet. Die Übersichtarbeiten wurden hinsichtlich ihrer klinischen Relevanz gewertet.

Ergebnisse

Die Datenlage präsentiert sich uneinheitlich aufgrund des heterogenen Patientenkollektivs und der teilweise hohen Therapieresistenz in einigen Studien, die eine allgemeine Aussage über die Wirksamkeit der tDCS bei Depressionen nicht zuverlässig ermöglichen.

Schlussfolgerung

Die tDCS gilt als sicher und mit nur geringen Nebenwirkungen behaftet. Die Wirksamkeit der tDCS sinkt mit steigender Therapieresistenz. Psychotrope Medikamente können ihre Wirkung abschwächen oder verstärken. Eine Stimulation mit 2 mA Stromstärke über 20 Minuten Dauer pro Tag über einen begrenzten Zeitraum kann als sicher gelten.

Summary

Objective

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated for the treatment of major depressive disorders in recent years. Here, we review the implications of current research for the clinical use of tDCS in the treatment of major depressive disorder.

Materials and methods

Randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials, openlabel trials, case reports and review articles from English-spoken journals were examined in an extensive and systematic literature search. The review articles were evaluated with regard to their clinical relevance.

Results

Data of the review articles is inconsistent due to the heterogeneous patient samples and the partially high treatment resistance in some studies. A general statement about the efficacy of tDCS as a therapeutic tool in major depression seems not possible yet.

Conclusions

tDCS is considered as a safe therapeutic option and is associated with only minor side effects. The effectiveness of tDCS decreases with resistance to treatment. Psychotropic drugs may attenuate or amplify its effects. The use of 2 mA current strength over 20 minutes per day over a short time span can be considered as safe.

* in Zusammenarbeit mit der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hirnstimulation in der Psychiatrie (DGHP) e. V.,www.dghp-online.de


 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Bindman LJ, Lippold OC, Redfearn JW. The action of brief polarizing currents in the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long-lasting after-effects. J Physiol 1964; 172: 369-382.
  • 2 Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 2000; 527: 633-639.
  • 3 Nitsche MA. Modulation kortikaler Erregbarkeit beim Menschen durch transkranielle Gleichstromstimulation. Nervenarzt 2002; 73: 332-335.
  • 4 Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 2001; 57: 1899-1901.
  • 5 Campbell S, Mariott M, Nahmias C, McQueen GM. Lower hippocampal volume in patients suffering from depression: a meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161: 598-607.
  • 6 Hamilton JP, Siemer M, Gottlib IH. Amygdala volume in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies. Mol Psychiatry 2008; 13: 993-1000.
  • 7 Koenigs M, Grafman J. The functional neuroanatomy of depression: distinct roles for ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Behav Brain Res 2009; 201: 239-243.
  • 8 Grimm S. et al. Imbalance between left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in major depression is linked to negative emotional judgement: an fMRI study in severe major depression. Biol Psychiatry 2008; 63: 369-376.
  • 9 Vanderhasselt MA, de Raedt R, Leyman L, Baeken C. Acute effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on attentional control related to antidepressant outcomes. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2009; 34: 119-126.
  • 10 Reid SA, Duke LM, Allen JJ. Resting frontal electroencephalographic asymmetry in depression: inconsistencies suggest the need to identify mediating factors. Psychophysiol 1998; 35: 389-404.
  • 11 Debener S, Beauducel A, Nessler D, Brocke B, Heilemann H, Kayser J. Is the resting anterior EEG alpha asymmetry a trait marker for depression? Findings for healthy adults and clinically depressed patients. Neuropsychobiol 2000; 41: 31-37.
  • 12 Keeser D. et al. Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: a standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study. Neuroimage 2011; 55: 644-657.
  • 13 Keeser D. et al. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation changes connectivity of resting state networks during fMRI. J Neurosci 2011; 26: 15284-15293.
  • 14 Fregni F. et al. Cognitive effects of repeated sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with depression. Depr Anxiety 2006; 23: 1-3.
  • 15 Fregni F. et al. Treatment of major depression with transcranial direct current stimulation. Bipolar Disord 2006; 08: 203-205.
  • 16 Boggio PS. et al. Go-no-go task performance improvement after anodal transcranial direct DC stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in major depression. J Affect Disord 2007; 101: 91-98.
  • 17 Boggio PS. et al. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2008; 11: 249-254.
  • 18 Rigonatti SP. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation and fluoxetin for the treatment of depression. Eur Psychiatry 2008; 23: 74-76.
  • 19 Loo CK. et al. A double-Blind, sham-controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2010; 13: 61-69.
  • 20 Loo CK. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for depression: 3-week, randomized, shamcontrolled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2012; 200: 52-59.
  • 21 Palm U. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in treatment resistant depression: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Brain Stimul 2012; 05: 242-251.
  • 22 Blumberger DM. et al. A randomized double-blind sham-controlled study of transcranial direct current stimulation for treatment-resistant major depression. Front Psychiatry 2012; 03: 74.
  • 23 Brunoni AR. et al. The sertraline vs. electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study: results from a factorial, randomized, controlled trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2013; 70: 893-891.
  • 24 Ferrucci R. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in severe, drug-resistant major depression. J Affect Disord 2008; 118: 215-219.
  • 25 Ferruci R. et al. Comparative benefits of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) treatment in patients with mild/moderate vs. severe depression. Clin Neuropsychiatry 2009; 06: 246-151.
  • 26 Brunoni AR. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in unipolar vs. bipolar disorder. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2011; 35: 96-101.
  • 27 Martin DM, Alonzo A, Mitchell PB, Sachdev P, Galvez V, Loo CK. Fronto-extracephalic transcranial direct current stimulation as a treatment for major depression: an open-label pilot study. J Affect Disord 2011; 134: 469-463.
  • 28 Dell’Osso B, Zanoni S, Ferrucci R, Vergari M, Castellano F, D’Urso N. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for the outpatient treatment of poor-responder depressed patients. Eur Psychiatry 2012; 27: 513-517.
  • 29 Brunoni AR, Ferrucci R, Bortolomasi M, Scelzo E, Boggio PS, Fregni F. et al. Interactions between transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and pharmacological interventions in major depressive episode: findings from a naturalistic study. Eur Psychiatry 2013; 28 (06) 356-61.
  • 30 Martin DM. et al. Continuation transcranial direct current stimulation for the prevention of relapse in major depression. J Affect Disord 2013; 25: 274-278.
  • 31 Valiengo L. et al. The sertraline versus electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study (SELECT-TDCS): results of the crossover and follow-up phases. Depress Anxiety 2013; 30 (07) 646-53.
  • 32 Palm U. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in a patient with therapy-resistant major depression. World J Biol Psychiatry 2009; 10 (Pt 2): 632-635.
  • 33 Arul-Anandam AP, Loo CK, Mitchell P. Induction of hypomanic episode in unipolar depression during transcranial direct current stimulation. J ECT 2010; 26: 68-69.
  • 34 Baccaro A, Brunoni AR, Bensenor IM, Fregni F. Hypomanic episode in unipolar depression during transcranial direct current stimulation. Acta Neuropsychiatr 2010; 22: 316-318.
  • 35 Brunoni AR, Valiengo L, Zanao TA, de Oliveira JF, Bensenor IM, Fregni F. Manic psychosis after sertraline and transcranial direct current stimulation. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2011; 23: E4-5.
  • 36 Bueno VF. et al. Mood and cognitive effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in poststroke depression. Neurocase 2011; 17: 318-322.
  • 37 Galvez V, Alonzo A, Martin D, Mitchell PB, Sachdev P, Loo CK. Hypomania induction in a patient with bipolar II disorder by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). J ECT 2011; 27: 256-258.
  • 38 Brunoni AR, Ferrucci R, Fregni F, Boggio PS, Priori A. Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depressive disorder: a summary of preclinical, clinical and translational findings. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2012; 39: 9-16.
  • 39 Kalu UG, Sexton CE, Loo CK, Ebmeier KP. Transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2012; 42: 1791-1800.
  • 40 Berlim MT, Van den Eynde F, Daskalakis ZJ. Clinical utility of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for treating major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, doubleblind and sham-controlled trials. J Psychiatric Res 2013; 47: 1-7.
  • 41 Nitsche MA, Müller-Dahlhaus F, Paulus W, Ziemann U. The pharmacology of neuroplasticity induced by non-invasive brain stimulation: building models for the clinical use of CNS active drugs. J Physiol 2012; 590 (Pt 19): 4641-4662.
  • 42 Kuo MF, Nitsche MA. Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on cognition. Clin EEG Neurosci 2012; 43: 192-199.
  • 43 Oliveira JF. et al. Acute working memory improvement after tDCS in antidepressant-free patients with major depressive disorder. Neurosci Lett 2013; 537: 60-64.
  • 44 Wolkenstein L, Plewnia C. Amelioration of cognitive control in depression by transcranial direct current stimulation. Biol Psychiatry 2013; 73: 646-651.
  • 45 Iyer MB. et al. Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals. Neurology 2005; 64: 872-875.
  • 46 Palm U. et al. Skin lesions after treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimul 2008; 01: 386-387.
  • 47 Frank E. et al. Anodal skin lesions after treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul 2010; 03: 58-59.
  • 48 O’Connell NE. et al. Rethinking clinical trials of transcranial direct current stimulation: participant and assessor blinding is inadequate at intensities of 2 mA. PLoS One 2012; 07: e47514.
  • 49 Palm U. et al. Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebocontrolled clinical trials. Brain Stimul 2013; 06: 690-5.
  • 50 Peña-Gómez C, Sala-Lonch R, Junqué C, Clemente IC, Vidal D, Bargalló N. et al. Modulation of large-scale brain networks by transcranial direct current stimulation evidenced by resting-state functional MRI. Brain Stimul 2012; 05: 252-63.
  • 51 Meinzer M. et al. Electrical brain stimulation improves cognitive performance by modulating functional connectivity and task-specific activation. J Neurosci 2012; 32: 1859-1866.
  • 52 Bikson M, Rahman A, Datta A. computational models of transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin EEG Neurosci 2012; 43: 176-183.
  • 53 Nitsche MA. et al. The pharmacology of neuroplasticity induced by non-invasive brain stimulation: building models for the clinical use of CNS active drugs. J Physiol 2012; 590: 4641-4662.
  • 54 Rothwell JC. Clinical applications of noninvasive electrical stimulation: problems and potentials. Clin EEG Neurosci 2012; 43: 209-214.