Download PDF
Hamostaseologie 2004; 24(03): 151-156
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1619628
In eigener Sache
Schattauer GmbH

Screening und Surveillance des abdominellen Aortenaneurysmas

Abdominal aortic aneurysm: screening and surveillance
R. G. Ritter
1   Schwerpunkt Gefäß- und Endovaskularchirurgie des Klinikums der J.-W.-Goethe-Universität und Sektion Gefäßchirurgie des Hospitals zum Heiligen Geist (Leiter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Thomas Schmitz-Rixen), Frankfurt am Main
,
K. Nelson
1   Schwerpunkt Gefäß- und Endovaskularchirurgie des Klinikums der J.-W.-Goethe-Universität und Sektion Gefäßchirurgie des Hospitals zum Heiligen Geist (Leiter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Thomas Schmitz-Rixen), Frankfurt am Main
,
F. Adili
1   Schwerpunkt Gefäß- und Endovaskularchirurgie des Klinikums der J.-W.-Goethe-Universität und Sektion Gefäßchirurgie des Hospitals zum Heiligen Geist (Leiter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Thomas Schmitz-Rixen), Frankfurt am Main
,
Th. Schmitz-Rixen
1   Schwerpunkt Gefäß- und Endovaskularchirurgie des Klinikums der J.-W.-Goethe-Universität und Sektion Gefäßchirurgie des Hospitals zum Heiligen Geist (Leiter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Thomas Schmitz-Rixen), Frankfurt am Main
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Ein Screening der Population für das abdominelle infrarenale Bauchaortenaneurysma ist nur grenzwertig kosteneffektiv. Ein Screening der Subpopulation von männlichen Rauchern zwischen 60 und 75 Jahren und von Männern und rauchenden Frauen mit positiver Familienanamnese oder vaskulären Krankheiten anderer Lokalisation und Ursache ist jedoch kosteneffektiv. Es kann die steigende Mortalität halbieren. Die Indikation zum Handeln ist bei Männern ab einem Aneurysmadurchmesser von 5,5 cm gegeben, bei Frauen ist dieser Grenzwert noch zu bestimmen, dürfte aber bei 4,5 bis 5 cm liegen.

Die Surveillance noch nicht für eine Aneurysmaausschaltung in Frage kommender Patienten darf nicht nur den Aneurymadurchmesser berücksichtigen, sondern sollte auch bei Überschreiten einer jährlichen Wachstumsrate von 0,5 cm zur Behandlung führen.

Summary

A screening program for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has limited cost-effectiveness. Yet, screening of the subpopulation of smoking men aged 60-75 years, or men and smoking women with a family history of vascular diseases or other cardio-vascular co-morbidity is cost-effective and has been demonstrated. It is suited to halve the increasing mortality of AAA. Elective repair of AAA is justified at diameters larger than 5.5 cm for men, but uncertain for women. However, aortic diameters between 4.5 and 5 cm in women probably necessitate an invasive approach.

Surveillance of patients who still not meet these criteria should not only include the absolute diameter of the aneurysm, but direct individuals with aneurysms at an annual expansion rate of more than 0,5 cm to elective repair.

Schlüsselwörter

Aneurysma - Bauchaortenaneurysma

Keywords

Aneurysm - abdominal aortic aneurysm
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Anonymous. Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Lancet 1998; 352: 1649-55.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Anonymous. Multicentre aneurysm screening study (MASS): cost effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms based on four year results from randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 2002; 325: 1135.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Allardice JT, Allwright GJ, Wafula JM. et al. High prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in men with peripheral vascular disease: screening by ultrasonography. Br J Surg 1988; 75: 240-2.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Bengtsson H, Bergqvist D, Sternby NH. Increasing prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms. A necropsy study. Eur J Surg 1992; 158: 19-23.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Brown LC, Powell JT. Risk factors for aneurysm rupture in patients kept under ultrasound surveillance. UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Ann Surg 1999; 230: 289-96 296-7.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Cayne NS, Veith FJ, Lipsitz EC. et al. Variability of maximal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements on CT scan: significance and methods to minimize. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39: 811-5.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 CDC. Growth Charts for the United States. 2000
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Collin J. The epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Hosp Med 1988; 40: 64-7.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Collin J. The incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 1985; 72: 499.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Collin J. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg 1985; 72: 851-2.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Collin J, Araujo L, Lindsell D. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Lancet 1987; 2: 736-7.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Collin J, Araujo L, Walton J. et al. Oxford screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm in men aged 65 to 74 years. Lancet 1988; 2: 613-5.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 d’Audiffret A, Santilli S, Tretinyak A. et al. Fate of the ectatic infrarenal aorta: expansion rates and outcomes. Ann Vasc Surg 2002; 16: 534-6.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Greenhalgh RM, Forbes JF, Fowkes FG. et al. Early elective open surgical repair of small abdominal aortic aneurysms is not recommended: results of the UK Small Aneurysm Trial. Steering Committee. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998; 16: 462-4.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Greenhalgh RM, Powell JT. Screening men for aortic aneurysm. Br Med J 2002; 325: 1123-4.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Hallett Jr JW, Naessens JM, Ballard DJ. Early and late outcome of surgical repair for small abdominal aortic aneurysms: a population-based analysis. J Vasc Surg 1993; 18: 684-91.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Haveman JW, Karliczek A, Verhoeven E. et al. Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS). Lancet 2003; 361: 1058.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Johnston KW, Rutherford RB, Tilson MD. et al. Suggested standards for reporting on arterial aneurysms. Subcommittee on Reporting Standards for Arterial Aneurysms, Ad Hoc Committee on Reporting Standards, Society for Vascular Surgery and North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg 1991; 13: 452-8.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Kurvers HA, van der Graaf Y, Blankensteijn JD. et al. Screening for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis and aneurysm of the abdominal aorta: comparing the yield between patients with manifest atherosclerosis and patients with risk factors for atherosclerosis only. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37: 1226-33.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE. et al. Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair. JAMA 2002; 287: 2968-72.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE. et al. Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 441-9.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE. et al. Relationship of age, gender, race, and body size to infrarenal aortic diameter. The Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators. J Vasc Surg 1997; 26: 595-601.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Lederle FA, Simel DL. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm?. JAMA 1999; 281: 77-82.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR. et al. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21: 945-52.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 McCleary AJ, Mahomed A. UK small aneurysms trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 408-9.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Nevitt MP, Ballard DJ, Hallett Jr. JW. Prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. A population-based study. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 1009-14.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Reitsma JB, Pleumeekers HJ, Hoes AW. et al. Increasing incidence of aneurysms of the abdominal aorta in The Netherlands. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996; 12: 446-51.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Ritter R, Grabitz K, Godehardt E. et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm – is surgical therapy in over 80-year-old patients justified?. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1996; 113 (Suppl): 894-6.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Scott RA, Tisi PV, Ashton HA. et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture rates: a 7-year follow-up of the entire abdominal aortic aneurysm population detected by screening. J Vasc Surg 1998; 28: 124-8.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Scott RA, Wilson NM, Ashton HA. et al. Influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 5-year results of a randomized controlled study. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 1066-70.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Singh K, Bonaa KH, Jacobsen BK. et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms in a population-based study: The Tromso Study. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 154: 236-44.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Suga M, Yamamoto Y, Sunami N. et al. Rupture of previously documented asymptomatic unruptured aneurysms – aneurysm size: risk factor for aneurysm rupture. No Shinkei Geka 2002; 30: 609-15.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Valdes F, Bergoeing M, Kramer A. et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients over 80 years of age: conventional surgical treatment in 80 consecutive cases. Rev Med Chil 2003; 131: 981-6.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Vardulaki KA, Prevost TC, Walker NM. et al. Growth rates and risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1674-80.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Vazquez C, Sakalihasan N, D’Harcour JB. et al. Routine ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65- and 75-year-old men in a city of 200,000 inhabitants. Ann Vasc Surg 1998; 12: 544-9.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Webster MW, Ferrell RE, St Jean PL. et al. Ultrasound screening of first-degree relatives of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 1991; 13: 9-13 14.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Webster MW, St Jean PL, Steed DL. et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: results of a family study. J Vasc Surg 1991; 13: 366-72.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Wilmink AB, Pleumeekers HJ, Hoes AW. et al. The infrarenal aortic diameter in relation to age: only part of the population in older age groups shows an increase. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998; 16: 431-7.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Wilmink AB, Quick CR. Epidemiology and potential for prevention of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 155-62.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Wilson KA, Lee AJ, Hoskins PR. et al. The relationship between aortic wall distensibility and rupture of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37: 112-7.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar