Semin Speech Lang 2018; 39(01): 025-036
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1608853
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Contemporary Approaches to the Management of Post-stroke Apraxia of Speech

Alexandra Basilakos
1   Arnold School of Public Health, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 January 2018 (online)

Abstract

Apraxia of speech (AOS) is a motor speech disorder that disrupts the planning and programming of speech motor movements. In the acute stage of stroke recovery, AOS following unilateral (typically) left hemisphere stroke can occur alongside dysarthria, an impairment in speech execution and control, and/or aphasia, a higher-level impairment in language function. At this time, perceptual evaluation (the systematic, although subjective, description of speech and voice characteristics) is perhaps the only “gold standard” for differential diagnosis when it comes to motor speech disorders. This poses a challenge for speech-language pathologists charged with the evaluation of poststroke communication abilities, as distinguishing production impairments associated with AOS from those that can occur in aphasia and/or dysarthria can be difficult, especially when more than one deficit is present. Given the need for more objective, reliable methods to identify and diagnose AOS, several studies have turned to acoustic evaluation and neuroimaging to supplement clinical assessment. This article focuses on these recent advances. Studies investigating acoustic evaluation of AOS will be reviewed, as well as those that have considered the extent that neuroimaging can guide clinical decision making. Developments in the treatment of AOS will also be discussed. Although more research is needed regarding the use of these methods in everyday clinical practice, the studies reviewed here show promise as emerging tools for the management of AOS.

 
  • References

  • 1 Hope TM, Seghier ML, Leff AP, Price CJ. Predicting outcome and recovery after stroke with lesions extracted from MRI images. Neuroimage Clin 2013; 2: 424-433
  • 2 Flowers HL, Skoretz SA, Silver FL. , et al. Poststroke aphasia frequency, recovery, and outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97 (12) 2188-2201.e8
  • 3 Duffy J. Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis and Management. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2005
  • 4 Duffy JR. Apraxia of speech in degenerative neurologic disease. Aphasiology 2006; 20 (06) 511-527
  • 5 Duffy JR, Josephs KA. The diagnosis and understanding of apraxia of speech: why including neurodegenerative etiologies may be important. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2012; 55 (05) S1518-S1522
  • 6 Mauszycki S, Wambaugh J, Wright S. A sub-acute case of resolving acquired apraxia of speech and aphasia. Int J Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 2: 188-194
  • 7 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Acquired Apraxia of Speech. Practice Portal. Available at: http://www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Clinical-Topics/Acquired-Apraxia-of-Speech/ . Accessed September 9, 2017
  • 8 van der Merwe A. A theoretical framework for the characterization of pathological speech sensorimotor control. In: McNeil MR. , ed. Clinical Management of Sensorimotor Speech Disorders. New York, NY: Thieme; 1997: 1-25
  • 9 Graff-Radford J, Jones DT, Strand EA, Rabinstein AA, Duffy JR, Josephs KA. The neuroanatomy of pure apraxia of speech in stroke. Brain Lang 2014; 129: 43-46
  • 10 Moser D, Basilakos A, Fillmore P, Fridriksson J. Brain damage associated with apraxia of speech: evidence from case studies. Neurocase 2016; 22 (04) 346-356
  • 11 Strand EA, Duffy JR, Clark HM, Josephs K. The apraxia of speech rating scale: a tool for diagnosis and description of apraxia of speech. J Commun Disord 2014; 51: 43-50
  • 12 Basilakos A, Yourganov G, den Ouden DB. , et al. A multivariate analytic approach to the differential diagnosis of apraxia of speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2017; 60 (12) DOI: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0443.
  • 13 Cunningham KT, Haley KL, Jacks A. Speech sound distortions in aphasia and apraxia of speech: reliability and diagnostic significance. Aphasiology 2016; 304 (04) 396-413
  • 14 Haley KL, Jacks A, Cunningham KT. Error variability and the differentiation between apraxia of speech and aphasia with phonemic paraphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2013; 56 (03) 891-905
  • 15 Miller N. Variability in speech dyspraxia. Clin Linguist Phon 1992; 6 (1–2): 77-85
  • 16 Whiteside SP, Dyson L, Cowell PE, Varley RA. The relationship between apraxia of speech and oral apraxia: association or dissociation?. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2015; 30 (07) 670-682
  • 17 Croot K. Diagnosis of AOS: definition and criteria. Semin Speech Lang 2002; 23 (04) 267-280
  • 18 Darley F. The classification of output disturbances in neurogenic communication disorders. Paper presented at: American Speech and Hearing Association Annual Conference; Chicago, IL, 1969
  • 19 McNeil MR, Pratt SR, Fossett TRD. The differential diagnosis of apraxia of speech. In: Maassen B, Kent R, Peters H, van Lieshout P, Hulstijn W. , eds. Speech Motor Control in Normal and Disordered Speech. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2004: 389-41
  • 20 McNeil MR, Robin DA, Schmidt RA. Apraxia of speech: definition, differentiation, and treatment. In: McNeil MR. , ed. Clinical Management of Sensorimotor Speech Disorders. New York, NY: Thieme; 1997: 311-344
  • 21 Ogar J, Slama H, Dronkers N, Amici S, Gorno-Tempini ML. Apraxia of speech: an overview. Neurocase 2005; 11 (06) 427-432
  • 22 Basilakos A, Rorden C, Bonilha L, Moser D, Fridriksson J. Patterns of poststroke brain damage that predict speech production errors in apraxia of speech and aphasia dissociate. Stroke 2015; 46 (06) 1561-1566
  • 23 Duffy JR, Gawle CA. Apraxic speakers' vowel duration in consonant-vowel-consonant syllables. In: Rosenbek J, McNeil MR, Aronson AE. , eds. Apraxia of Speech: Physiology, Acoustics, Linguistics, Management. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press; 1984: 168-196
  • 24 Itoh M, Sasanuma S, Tatsumi IF, Murakami S, Fukusako Y, Suzuki T. Voice onset time characteristics in apraxia of speech. Brain Lang 1982; 17 (02) 193-210
  • 25 Itoh M, Sasanuma S, Ushijima T. Velar movements during speech in a patient with apraxia of speech. Brain Lang 1979; 7 (02) 227-239
  • 26 Robin DA, Bean C, Folkins JW. Lip movement in apraxia of speech. J Speech Hear Res 1989; 32 (03) 512-523
  • 27 Shankweiler D, Harris KS. An experimental approach to the problem of articulation in aphasia. Cortex 1966; 2 (03) 277-292
  • 28 Rosenbek J, Kent R, Lapointe L. Apraxia of speech: an overview and some perspectives. In: Rosenbek JC, McNeil MR, Aronson AE. , eds. Apraxia of Speech: Physiology, Acoustics, Linguistics, Management. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press; 1984: 1-72
  • 29 Dabul BL. Apraxia Battery for Adults. 2nd ed. Dallas, TX: Pro-Ed; 2000
  • 30 Dabul BL. Apraxia Battery for Adults. Tigard, OR: C.C. Publications; 1979
  • 31 Fromm D, Abbs JH, McNeil MR, Rosenbek JC. Simultaneous perceptual-physiological method for studying apraxia of speech. In: Brookshire R. , ed. Clinical Aphasiology. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publications; 1982: 65-80
  • 32 Buchwald A, Miozzo M. Phonological and motor errors in individuals with acquired sound production impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2012; 55 (05) S1573-S1586
  • 33 Buchwald A, Miozzo M. Finding levels of abstraction in speech production: evidence from sound-production impairment. Psychol Sci 2011; 22 (09) 1113-1119
  • 34 Buchwald A, Gagnon B, Miozzo M. Identification and remediation of phonolgical and motor errors in acquired sound production impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2017; 60: 1726-1738 , doi: 10.44/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0240
  • 35 Maas E, Robin DA, Wright DL, Ballard KJ. Motor programming in apraxia of speech. Brain Lang 2008; 106 (02) 107-118
  • 36 Bislick LP, Weir PC, Spencer K, Kendall D, Yorkston KM. Do principles of motor learning enhance retention and transfer of speech skills? A systematic review. Aphasiology 2012; 26 (05) 709-728
  • 37 Arvaniti A. The usefulness of metrics in the quantification of speech rhythm. J Phonetics 2012; 40 (03) 351-373
  • 38 Ling LE, Grabe E, Nolan F. Quantitative characterizations of speech rhythm: syllable-timing in Singapore English. Lang Speech 2000; 43 (Pt 4): 377-401
  • 39 Liss JM, White L, Mattys SL. , et al. Quantifying speech rhythm abnormalities in the dysarthrias. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2009; 52 (05) 1334-1352
  • 40 Ballard KJ, Azizi L, Duffy JR. , et al. A predictive model for diagnosing stroke-related apraxia of speech. Neuropsychologia 2016; 81: 129-139
  • 41 Vergis MK, Ballard KJ, Duffy JR, McNeil MR, Scholl D, Layfield C. An acoustic measure of lexical stress differentiates aphasia and aphasia plus apraxia of speech after stroke. Aphasiology 2014; 28 (05) 554-575
  • 42 Duffy JR, Hanley H, Utianski R. , et al. Temporal acoustic measures distinguish primary progressive apraxia of speech from primary progressive aphasia. Brain Lang 2017; 168: 84-94
  • 43 Duffy JR, Strand EA, Clark H, Machulda M, Whitwell JL, Josephs KA. Primary progressive apraxia of speech: clinical features and acoustic and neurologic correlates. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2015; 24 (02) 88-100
  • 44 Ballard KJ, Savage S, Leyton CE, Vogel AP, Hornberger M, Hodges JR. Logopenic and nonfluent variants of primary progressive aphasia are differentiated by acoustic measures of speech production. PLoS One 2014; 9 (02) e89864
  • 45 Boersma P, Weenink D. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. 2015. [computer program, version 5.4.17]. Available at: http://www.praat.org . Accessed November 15, 2017
  • 46 Peterson GE, Lehiste I. Duration of syllable nuclei in English. J Acoust Soc Am 1960; 32 (06) 693-703
  • 47 White L, Mattys SL. Calibrating rhythm: first language and second language studies. J Phonetics 2007; 35 (04) 501-522
  • 48 Thomas ER, Carter PM. Prosodic rhythm and African American English. Engl World-Wide 2006; 27 (03) 331-355
  • 49 Ghitza O, Greenberg S. On the possible role of brain rhythms in speech perception: intelligibility of time-compressed speech with periodic and aperiodic insertions of silence. Phonetica 2009; 66 (1–2): 113-126
  • 50 MacNeilage PF. The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production. Behav Brain Sci 1998; 21 (04) 499-511 , discussion 511–546
  • 51 Giraud A-L, Kleinschmidt A, Poeppel D, Lund TE, Frackowiak RS, Laufs H. Endogenous cortical rhythms determine cerebral specialization for speech perception and production. Neuron 2007; 56 (06) 1127-1134
  • 52 Liss JM, LeGendre S, Lotto AJ. Discriminating dysarthria type from envelope modulation spectra. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2010; 53 (05) 1246-1255
  • 53 Shahin MA, Ahmed B, Ballard KJ. Automatic classification of unequal lexical stress patterns using machine learning algorithms. Paper presented at: Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT); Miami, FL, 2012 IEEE2012
  • 54 Bates E, Wilson SM, Saygin AP. , et al. Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6 (05) 448-450
  • 55 Yourganov G, Smith KG, Fridriksson J, Rorden C. Predicting aphasia type from brain damage measured with structural MRI. Cortex 2015; 73: 203-215
  • 56 Price CJ, Seghier ML, Leff AP. Predicting language outcome and recovery after stroke: the PLORAS system. Nat Rev Neurol 2010; 6 (04) 202-210
  • 57 Hillis AE, Wityk RJ, Tuffiash E. , et al. Hypoperfusion of Wernicke's area predicts severity of semantic deficit in acute stroke. Ann Neurol 2001; 50 (05) 561-566
  • 58 Fridriksson J, Morrow-Odom L, Moser D, Fridriksson A, Baylis G. Neural recruitment associated with anomia treatment in aphasia. Neuroimage 2006; 32 (03) 1403-1412
  • 59 Hillis AE, Work M, Barker PB, Jacobs MA, Breese EL, Maurer K. Re-examining the brain regions crucial for orchestrating speech articulation. Brain 2004; 127 (Pt 7): 1479-1487
  • 60 Richardson JD, Fillmore P, Rorden C, Lapointe LL, Fridriksson J. Re-establishing Broca's initial findings. Brain Lang 2012; 123 (02) 125-130
  • 61 Itabashi R, Nishio Y, Kataoka Y. , et al. Damage to the left precentral gyrus is associated with apraxia of speech in acute stroke. Stroke 2016; 47 (01) 31-36
  • 62 New AB, Robin DA, Parkinson AL. , et al. Altered resting-state network connectivity in stroke patients with and without apraxia of speech. Neuroimage Clin 2015; 8: 429-439
  • 63 Ballard KJ, Tourville JA, Robin DA. Behavioral, computational, and neuroimaging studies of acquired apraxia of speech. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 8: 892
  • 64 Dronkers NF. A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation. Nature 1996; 384 (6605): 159-161
  • 65 Baldo JV, Wilkins DP, Ogar J, Willock S, Dronkers NF. Role of the precentral gyrus of the insula in complex articulation. Cortex 2011; 47 (07) 800-807
  • 66 Dronkers N, Ogar J, Willock S, Wilkins DP. Confirming the role of the insula in coordinating complex but not simple articulatory movements. Brain Lang 2004; 91 (01) 23-24
  • 67 Nagao M, Takeda K, Komori T, Isozaki E, Hirai S. Apraxia of speech associated with an infarct in the precentral gyrus of the insula. Neuroradiology 1999; 41 (05) 356-357
  • 68 Rorden C, Karnath HO. Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age?. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004; 5 (10) 813-819
  • 69 Trupe LA, Varma DD, Gomez Y. , et al. Chronic apraxia of speech and Broca's area. Stroke 2013; 44 (03) 740-744
  • 70 Finley A, Saver J, Alger J. , et al. Diffusion weighted imaging assessment of insular vulnerability in acute middle cerebral artery infarctions. Stroke 2003; 34 (01) 259-259
  • 71 Kodumuri N, Sebastian R, Davis C. , et al. The association of insular stroke with lesion volume. Neuroimage Clin 2016; 11: 41-45
  • 72 Hickok G, Rogalsky C, Chen R, Herskovits EH, Townsley S, Hillis AE. Partially overlapping sensorimotor networks underlie speech praxis and verbal short-term memory: evidence from apraxia of speech following acute stroke. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 8: 649
  • 73 Fox RJ, Kasner SE, Chatterjee A, Chalela JA. Aphemia: an isolated disorder of articulation. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2001; 103 (02) 123-126
  • 74 Kasahata N. Speech disturbances due to left precentral cortical lesions. Neurocase 2014; 20 (03) 328-337
  • 75 Ojha PK, Nandavar S, Pearson DM, Demchuk AM. Aphemia as a presenting symptom in acute stroke. Neurol India 2011; 59 (03) 432-434
  • 76 Carey LM, Seitz RJ, Parsons M. , et al. Beyond the lesion: neuroimaging foundations for post-stroke recovery. Future Neurol 2013; 8 (05) 507-527
  • 77 Bonilha L, Nesland T, Rorden C, Fillmore P, Ratnayake RP, Fridriksson J. Mapping remote subcortical ramifications of injury after ischemic strokes. Behav Neurol 2014; 2014: 215380
  • 78 Bonilha L, Rorden C, Fridriksson J. Assessing the clinical effect of residual cortical disconnection after ischemic strokes. Stroke 2014; 45 (04) 988-993
  • 79 Yourganov G, Fridriksson J, Rorden C, Gleichgerrcht E, Bonilha L. Multivariate connectome-based symptom mapping in post-stroke patients: networks supporting language and speech. J Neurosci 2016; 36 (25) 6668-6679
  • 80 Corbetta M, Ramsey L, Callejas A. , et al. Common behavioral clusters and subcortical anatomy in stroke. Neuron 2015; 85 (05) 927-941
  • 81 Ivanova MV, Isaev DY, Dragoy OV. , et al. Diffusion-tensor imaging of major white matter tracts and their role in language processing in aphasia. Cortex 2016; 85: 165-181
  • 82 Fridriksson J. Preservation and modulation of specific left hemisphere regions is vital for treated recovery from anomia in stroke. J Neurosci 2010; 30 (35) 11558-11564
  • 83 Fridriksson J, Bonilha L, Baker JM, Moser D, Rorden C. Activity in preserved left hemisphere regions predicts anomia severity in aphasia. Cereb Cortex 2010; 20 (05) 1013-1019
  • 84 Ballard KJ, Wambaugh JL, Duffy JR. , et al. Treatment for acquired apraxia of speech: a systematic review of intervention research between 2004 and 2012. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2015; 24 (02) 316-337
  • 85 Marangolo P, Fiori V, Cipollari S. , et al. Bihemispheric stimulation over left and right inferior frontal region enhances recovery from apraxia of speech in chronic aphasia. Eur J Neurosci 2013; 38 (09) 3370-3377
  • 86 Marangolo P, Fiori V, Sabatini U. , et al. Bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation language treatment enhances functional connectivity in the left hemisphere: preliminary data from aphasia. J Cogn Neurosci 2016; 28 (05) 724-738
  • 87 Marangolo P, Marinelli CV, Bonifazi S. , et al. Electrical stimulation over the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) determines long-term effects in the recovery of speech apraxia in three chronic aphasics. Behav Brain Res 2011; 225 (02) 498-504
  • 88 Varley R, Cowell PE, Dyson L, Inglis L, Roper A, Whiteside SP. Self-administered computer therapy for apraxia of speech: two-period randomized control trial with crossover. Stroke 2016; 47 (03) 822-828
  • 89 Polanowska KE, Leśniak MM, Seniów JB, Czepiel W, Członkowska A. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in early rehabilitation of patients with post-stroke non-fluent aphasia: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2013; 31 (06) 761-771
  • 90 You DS, Kim D-Y, Chun MH, Jung SE, Park SJ. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the right Wernicke's area improves comprehension in subacute stroke patients. Brain Lang 2011; 119 (01) 1-5
  • 91 Mallet KH, Shamloul RM, Corbett D. , et al. RecoverNow: feasibility of a mobile tablet-based rehabilitation intervention to treat post-stroke communication deficits in the acute care setting. PLoS One 2016; 11 (12) e0167950