J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2018; 79(03): 206-210
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606544
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Accuracy and Safety of Ventriculostomy Using Two Different Procedures of External Ventricular Drainage: A Single-Center Series

Patrick Schuss
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University Bonn, Bonn, Germany
,
Christian Wispel
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University Bonn, Bonn, Germany
,
Valeri Borger
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University Bonn, Bonn, Germany
,
Ági Güresir
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University Bonn, Bonn, Germany
,
Hartmut Vatter
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University Bonn, Bonn, Germany
,
Erdem Güresir
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University Bonn, Bonn, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

06 September 2016

28 June 2017

Publication Date:
22 September 2017 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Background and Study Aims Patients with acute hydrocephalus are treated by either insertion of a conventional external ventricular drain (EVD) or percutaneous needle trephination (PNT) at our institution, depending on the acuteness of intervention and the severity of illness. We compared both procedures regarding accuracy and safety necessitating surgical revision of EVD or PNT.

Methods Between January 2012 and January 2014, 451 ventriculostomies were performed in 301 patients at our institution. All patients underwent routine computed tomography after insertion of the ventricular drain during the treatment course. Patient characteristics, underlying pathology, ventriculostomy modality, radiologic features, catheter tip location, and treatment-related complications were analyzed.

Results A total of 307 of 451 ventriculostomy procedures (68%) were performed as conventional EVD, and 144 (32%) were performed as PNT. Overall, 11% of patients with conventional EVD underwent surgical revision due to lacking accuracy, infection, or hemorrhage; 7% of patients with PNT underwent surgical revision (p = 0.2). However, multivariate analysis revealed that only “hospital stay > 21 days” as an independent variable was significantly associated with surgical revision after ventriculostomy.

Conclusion The present data indicate that PNT has a similar safety profile in emergency situations in critically ill patients who need immediate treatment for acute hydrocephalus when compared with the conventional EVD procedure.