Keywords MS2 TRAM flap - breast reconstruction - indocyanine green dye
Perforator flaps within the rectus abdominis muscle are increasingly used in autologous
breast reconstruction owing to recent developments in surgical techniques. However,
due to individual differences in the vascular territory of a single-perforator-based
flap, it is necessary to raise a bipedicle flap when tissue from zones 1 to 4 is required
or when a lower midline scar is present. In addition, if the blood perfusion of the
single-perforator-based flap is considered unreliable, a muscle-sparing-2 transverse
rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (MS2 TRAM flap), which is raised as a multiple-perforator-based
flap, is selected. The MS2 TRAM flap spares the muscles that are medial and lateral
to the perforators. By identifying in advance the dominant territory of each perforator,
it is possible to determine whether there is a need for vascular anastomosis with
a vascular pedicle on the contralateral side, even in cases in which tissue from zones
1 to 4 is required, or in which a lower midline scar is present. It is also possible
to determine whether a single- or multiple-perforator-based flap is required.
In the present study, we devised a method using indocyanine green dye (ICG) fluorescence
angiography to help in determining the perforator territory that is required when
raising the flap. The method is applied during surgery. The perforators and vascular
pedicles are selected after the determination of the perfusion zone. Thus, the perforator
rows and vascular pedicle on the contralateral side can be preserved in cases in which
the vascular territory is extensive. In the present study, we examine cases in which
this method was applied and investigate its effectiveness.
Methods
Procedure I
For cases in which a lower midline scars is present or when tissue from zones 1 to
4 of the vascular pedicle on the contralateral side is required and in which vascular
anastomosis is deemed necessary, the following procedure is performed.
Prior to surgery, the position of the perforators and the pedicle course are identified
using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and are marked on the abdominal region.
The flap is designed in the standard position for a TRAM flap. The superior margin
of the flap is located at one fingerbreadth superior to the umbilical fossa. After
making an incision on the superficial fascia, the deep subcutaneous adipose tissue
beneath the superficial fascia is collected on the transverse axis of the flap (∼5
cm longer than the skin incision), along with part of the deep subcutaneous adipose
tissue. The flap forms a rectangle. The flap is then raised from the surface of the
fascia, opposite the primary vascular pedicle. Once the perforators are identified
and preserved to avoid damage ([Fig. 1 ]), the other parts are elevated from the surface of the fascia to reach the midline.
On the side of the primary vascular pedicle, the flap is raised from the lateral side.
The lateral row perforators are identified, and the anterior sheath of the rectus
abdominis muscle—through which the perforator penetrates—is opened and cut along the
lateral side of the perforators. The perforators are dissected toward the centrum
to reach the deep inferior epigastric vessels. Dissection is continued along the surface
of the fascia. The medial row perforators are identified, and the circumference of
the perforators is dissected from the surface of the fascia. Thus, only the perforators
remain connected to the fascia. The umbilicus is then hollowed out and was preserved
([Fig. 2 ]).
Fig. 1 Dissecting from the surface of the fascia, leaving the perforators behind on the
contralateral side. Arrows: Perforators preserved on the surface of the fascia.
Fig. 2 Only the perforators connected with the surface of the fascia. The circumference
of perforators is dissected from the surface of the fascia, leaving the perforators
behind. The umbilicus is hollowed out, leaving only the perforators connected with
the fascia.
The primary perforators are left open, while the blood flow of the perforators on
the contralateral side (with which vascular anastomosis is implemented) is blocked
using a microvascular clamp (clamp). ICG (2 cc; 2.5 mg/mL, intravenous and systemic)
is administered. After the administration of ICG, the imaging range, which is observed
using a HyperEye Medical System (Mizuho) or Photodynamic Eye (Hamamatsu Photonics),
begins to grow ([Fig. 3 ]). The clamp is released when the imaging range has been identified, after the enlargement
of the imaging range stops. In cases in which the vascular pedicle is located on one
side, if the imaging range is sufficiently large, and the required tissue mass is
considered to be implantable, vascular anastomosis of the contralateral side is unnecessary.
If the tissue mass is deemed insufficient (based on the imaging range), in such cases,
vascular anastomosis is performed with the vascular pedicle on the contralateral side
([Fig. 4 ]).
Fig. 3 A case in which the lower midline scar exists (upon angiography with the perforators
on the contralateral side clamped). The vascular pedicle is on the left side and the
perforators on the right side are clamped upon ICG fluorescence angiography. The contrast
medium is applied, without going beyond the midline, on the right side of the blue
line (contralateral side). The addition of vascular anastomosis is deemed necessary.
Fig. 4 Addition of vascular anastomosis. On the peripheral side of the main trunk, the central
side of the vascular pedicle to be anastomosed is anastomosed within the skin flap,
end-to-end, with both arteries and veins.
Procedure II
In cases treated using an MS2 TRAM flap or a DIEP flap, the flap design and skin incision
are performed according to the procedure described in I, and the same abdominal wall
approach is applied. The lateral row perforators are dissected, similarly as described
in procedure I. These lateral row perforators are regarded as the primary perforators.
The flap on the contralateral side of the primary vascular pedicle is raised from
the surface of the fascia. The perforators on the contralateral side are all ligated,
and the flap on the fascia is dissected to reach the midline. The umbilicus is hollowed
out beyond the midline. The medial row perforators on the side of the primary vascular
pedicle are then identified, and the circumference of the perforators is dissected
from the surface of the fascia, leaving the perforators behind ([Fig. 5 ]).
Fig. 5 The medial row perforators dissected on the surface of the fascia The medial row
perforators on the side of the primary vascular pedicle are identified and the circumference
of the perforators is dissected from the surface of the fascia, leaving the perforators
behind.
The primary lateral row perforators are left open, while the medial row perforators
are clamped. ICG is administered. After the enlargement stops, the imaging range is
recorded on the skin flap, and the clamp is released ([Fig. 6 ]).
Fig. 6 Angiography is conducted with the blood flow of the medial row perforators blocked,
and the imaging range was enlarged after the release of the clamps. Left: The left
side of the red line is the imaging range with the medial row perforators clamped.
Right: The imaging range was enlarged to the blue line when the medial row was included.
If the imaging range is barely enlarged, and it is determined that the necessary tissue
mass can be implanted using the lateral row perforators alone, the medial row perforators
are ligated, and the flap is raised using the lateral row perforators alone. If the
imaging range is significantly enlarged after the release of the clamp, and it is
determined that tissue mass in the enlarged range is required, the flap is raised
with both the lateral and medial row perforators ([Fig. 7 ]).
Fig. 7 The raised flap. The width of collected muscle was enlarged since the raised flap
included the medial row.
Subjects
One hundred thirty-two breast reconstruction procedures (immediate reconstruction,
n = 103; delayed reconstruction, n = 29) had been performed using the free MS2 TRAM flap method from May 2012 to December
2015. The population of the present study included 29 of these cases in which the
selection of perforators was deemed necessary. Specifically, these were cases in which
patients had lower midline scars (n = 11); cases in which it was deemed necessary to extend the flap beyond the zone
II/IV boundary based on the measurement of the chest skin length from the clavicle
to the inframammary fold (IMF) (n = 13) ([Fig. 8 ]); and cases in which it was deemed necessary to extend the flap based on preoperative
contrast-enhanced CT findings showing that the distance between the part raised from
the medial row perforator muscle and the part raised from the lateral row perforators
muscle would exceed two-thirds of the length of the entire muscle, indicating a significant
sacrifice of muscle (n = 5).
Fig. 8 The design prior to surgery. Left: The red line shows the skin length from beneath
the clavicle to the IMF. Right: ←→ has the same length from the clavicle to the IMF.
Results
In 13 cases, a great deal of tissue mass was required, and it was necessary to determine
whether vascular anastomosis to the vascular pedicle on the contralateral side was
required. Vascular anastomosis was ultimately implemented in two (15.4%) of these
cases. A lower midline scar existed in 11 cases, and vascular anastomosis was ultimately
implemented in two (18.2%) of these cases.
In five cases, the surgeons had to choose between a DIEP flap or an MS2 TRAM flap.
This included two (40%) cases in which medial row perforators were considered to be
required, and in which an MS2 TRAM flap was raised.
In 79.3% (23/29) of the cases, the clamping of perforators during ICG fluorescence
angiography was deemed unnecessary, making it possible to preserve the vascular pedicle
on the contralateral side and to preserve the muscle medial to the lateral row perforators.
The flaps survived in all cases. There was no consolidation due to necrosis of a partial
flap or fat necrosis in any of the cases. Hernia/bulging occurred in five cases. It
was impossible to preserve the medial row perforators in two of these five cases.
Discussion
A previous study reported that the imaging range of ICG fluorescence angiography was
almost the same as the surviving area of the flap in cases that involved pedicled
TRAM flap procedures. Another study evaluated the rate of fat necrosis within the
flap after surgery in cases that were performed before ICG fluorescence angiography
and in cases in which only the imaging range on ICG fluorescence angiography was investigated.
The study revealed that the rate of fat necrosis was lower in cases in which the range
was determined using angiography. The findings suggested that angiography was effective
and highly reliable for determining the area in which the flap can survive.[1 ]
[2 ] In the present study, no necrosis (including fat necrosis) occurred within the imaging
range obtained by ICG fluorescence angiography. This result was considered to be highly
reliable.
To facilitate the safe elevation of a flap, contrast-enhanced CT generally is performed
prior to surgery to clarify the perforators, that are to be included, and the pedicle
course.[3 ]
[4 ] However, contrast-enhanced CT cannot determine the dominant territory of each perforator.
Reticular choke vessels are located on the periphery of the perforators, where adjacent
choke vessels anastomose and communicate with each other (choke anastomosis). According
to the angiosome theory, while the blood flow from the primary vascular territory
of a vascular pedicle can extend its territory to the second vascular territory, and
beyond the first site of choke anastomosis, it cannot extend beyond the second site
of choke anastomosis.[5 ]
[6 ]
The range in which a flap can survive is determined based on two factors: the alignment
of perforators of the vascular pedicle on the contralateral side and the degree of
choke anastomosis between the perforators of the two vascular pedicles. Preoperative
contrast-enhanced CT can determine the pedicle course within the muscle and the arrangement
of the perforators, but cannot predict choke anastomosis, which defines the vascular
territory of the flap. This can effectively be determined by ICG fluorescence angiography.
The “ICG clamp test,” allows the vascular territory of the perforators, which are
thought to meet the minimum requirements, to be determined before the blood vessels
are raised from inside the muscle. Thus, it allows the surgeon to determine whether
the addition of a vascular pedicle on the contralateral side or the medial row perforators
is needed. Consequently, the blood vessels that are not required for flap survival
can be preserved. In the present study, in 79.3% of cases in which the addition of
a vascular pedicle was initially thought to be required, the addition was ultimately
deemed to be unnecessary—indicating the utility of this method for intraoperative
decision making.
If lateral and medial row perforators exist, they, respectively, have distinct dominant
territories. It has been reported that lateral and medial row perforators strongly
dominate zones 3 and 2, respectively. The MS2 TRAM flap, which includes both the lateral
and medial row if possible, is thought to be more effective than the DIEP flap in
regard to avoiding partial necrosis. Based on this test, although partial necrosis
and fat necrosis did not occur in DIEP flaps determined as having satisfactory blood
perfusion, our results revealed that only an MS2 TRAM flap could be implanted with
good blood perfusion in 40% of all cases.
It has been reported that, regarding complications associated with flaps, such as
necrosis/partial necrosis of flaps and fat necrosis, fat necrosis following surgery
occurs at a lower rate with multiple-perforator-based flaps raised rather than with
single-perforator-based flaps. Moreover, the incidence rate thereof with DIEP flaps
is reported to be significantly higher than that with conventional TRAM flaps. Since
the hemodynamics of MS2 TRAM flaps, which include both lateral and medial row perforators,
is thought to be nearly the same as that of conventional TRAM flaps, MS2 TRAM flaps
are more effective in reducing complications associated with flaps than DIEP flaps.
Therefore, we, basically, elevate the MS2 TRAM flap as the first choice. This method
is also thought to be effective as it enables an appropriate determination to be made
between either a DIEP flap or an MS2 TRAM flap.
Our elevated MS2 TRAM flap contains both lateral and medial row perforators as confirmed
by CT, generally including three to seven perforators. By separating the muscles from
the perforators and exfoliating only the blood vessels, we try to preserve the muscles.
In our method, we primarily want to elevate the MS2 TRAM flap. To achieve this, we
first secure the lateral row perforators and carefully check the main duct of the
vascular pedicle. Consequently, we believe that it is not possible to use the medial
row as the basic axis. While in some cases the medial row perforators are the dominant
vessels (having dominant territories), the lateral row perforators must be the basic
axis in our method.
Hernia and/or abdominal distension is a noteworthy complication of abdominal surgery.
Conventional TRAM flaps have been reported to be associated with a higher incidence
of these complications in comparison to DIEP flaps;[7 ]
[8 ]
[9 ]
[10 ]
[11 ] however, the incidence of hernia/abdominal distension did not differ to a statistically
significant extent between patients who received MS2 TRAM and those who received DIEP
flaps.[7 ]
[8 ]
[9 ]
[10 ] Furthermore, the incidence of hernia/abdominal distension with MS2 TRAM flaps is
equivalent to the average incidence of hernia/abdominal distension in patients who
receive conventional TRAM and DIEP flaps.[7 ]
[11 ]
If it is possible to implant the tissue from zones 1 to 4 using the lateral row alone,
the flap should be raised using the lateral row alone. In addition, to avoid abdominal
complications, if the distance between the lateral and medial rows is sufficiently
long, surgeons should check to see if the lateral row alone is sufficient, as this
can prevent unnecessary muscle sacrifice.
The incidence of hernia/abdominal distension in cases involving bilateral vascular
pedicle collection is reported to be higher than that in cases involving unilateral
collection.[11 ]
[12 ] Furthermore, the incidence of hernia is reported to be higher in patients with lower
midline scars.[12 ] In cases in which the unilateral vascular pedicle can be transplanted with tissue
from zones 1 to 4, the incidence of postoperative hernia can be reduced to a greater
degree in comparison to cases in which bilateral vascular pedicles are used. Our clamp
test is thought to be effective for minimizing muscle sacrifice.
Conclusion
The elevation of a bipedicle flap for vascular anastomosis and the elevation of a
flap that includes both the medial and lateral row perforators increases abdominal
invasion. Our novel method, which identified the perforators that were required for
survival, was thought to be effective for minimizing this invasion and avoiding unnecessary
surgery.
