J Hand Microsurg 2017; 09(02): 107-108
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604291
Letter to the Editor
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

The Adipofascial Nerve Patch as an Alternative to Grafting in Partial Transection of a Peripheral Nerve

Wojciech Konczalik
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
Amir H. Sadr
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
Dariush Nikkhah
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

25 February 2017

15 June 2017

Publication Date:
21 July 2017 (online)

Peripheral nerve injuries can be secondary to trauma, crush injuries, ischemia, and traction events. Without appropriate management, significant patient morbidity can occur resulting in dysfunction. Peripheral nerves are encased in the epineurium that protects and nourishes the individual nerve fascicles. Major blood vessels and adipofascial tissues run over the outer surface of the epineural layer. If a peripheral nerve in the upper extremity is completely transected, tension-free epineural repair should be performed with an operating microscope.

There are occasions when there is partial nerve transection with loss of neuronal tissue and primary repair can be challenging as achieving tension-free repair may not be possible despite adjusting the patient's position on the operating table. Furthermore, these injuries may result in buckling and distortion at the repair site if epineural repair is attempted. Tension at the repair site will result in gapping, connective tissue proliferation, scar formation, and ischemia.[1] The latter can result in neuroma formation.[2] It is possible to bridge the gap with an autologous or synthetic nerve conduit; however, factors such as donor site morbidity as well as the high cost and limited availability of synthetic constructs do not justify their use in these situations. The authors present a novel method to circumvent these problems when encountering partial nerve injuries.

An 11-year-old boy sustained a glass laceration to the volar surface of his wrist. Exploration under general anesthesia revealed a partial division of his median nerve with loss of neuronal tissue on the anterior most aspect of the nerve ([Fig. 1A]). The epineurium was repaired with 8–0 S&T peripherally; however, the central portion remained under significant tension and repair would result in buckling and distortion ([Fig. 1B]). Vascularized adipofascial tissue surrounding the nerve was therefore harvested as a patch and rotated into the defect ([Fig. 1C]). This was sutured with 8–0 S&T over the small defect to serve as a framework for nerve regeneration ([Fig. 1D]).

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 (A) Epineural repair of peripheral ends of partially divided median nerve with 8–0 S&T. (B) Central section buckles and is under tension if epineural repair is completed with 8–0 S&T. (C) Adipofascial tissues elevated and patch rotated into epineural defect. (D) Patch sutured in with 8–0 S&T.

Animal models have shown that wrapping of adipofascial conduits around the site of primary neurorrhaphy reduces scar formation;[3] the same may hold true of vascularized adipofascial tissue over the repair site. Application of adipose tissue to sites of nerve damage promotes neuronal regeneration and functional recovery in rodent models by serving as a mechanical barrier protecting neuronal sprouts from their immediate environment.[4] It is important to note that use of the adipofascial flap cannot substitute autologous nerve grafting, which to date remains the gold standard of peripheral nerve repair in cases in which primary reapproximation is not possible.[4] The role of the adipofascial flap in the case described is largely limited to protecting and guiding the regenerating axons. Other techniques of bridging nerve gaps are being developed and include vein filled with muscle graft and amnion muscle combined graft (AMCG) conduits, which have been shown to give good results in gaps up to 3 and 5 cm, respectively.[5] [6]

At 4-month follow-up, the patient had full sensation and normal static two-point discrimination, with full range of motion and normal thumb opposition. Minor scar sensitivity was noted over the wrist and there was no evidence of neuroma formation clinically.

 
  • References

  • 1 Sunderland IR, Brenner MJ, Singham J, Rickman SR, Hunter DA, Mackinnon SE. Effect of tension on nerve regeneration in rat sciatic nerve transection model. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53 (04) 382-387
  • 2 Xu QG, Zochodne DW. Ischemia and failed regeneration in chronic experimental neuromas. Brain Res 2002; 946 (01) 24-30
  • 3 Hasegawa J, Shibata M, Takahashi H. Nerve coaptation studies with and without a gap in rabbits. J Hand Surg Am 1996; 21 (02) 259-265
  • 4 Ray WZ, Mackinnon SE. Management of nerve gaps: autografts, allografts, nerve transfers, and end-to-side neurorrhaphy. Exp Neurol 2010; 223 (01) 77-85
  • 5 Riccio M, Pangrazi PP, Parodi PC. , et al. The amnion muscle combined graft (AMCG) conduits: a new alternative in the repair of wide substance loss of peripheral nerves. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (08) 616-622
  • 6 Battiston B, Tos P, Geuna S, Giacobini-Robecchi MG, Guglielmone R. Nerve repair by means of vein filled with muscle grafts. II. Morphological analysis of regeneration. Microsurgery 2000; 20 (01) 37-41