Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2017; 38(02): 147-158
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1599112
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Quantifying Neonatal Sucking Performance: Promise of New Methods

Gilson J. Capilouto
1   Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
,
Tommy J. Cunningham
2   NFANT Labs, LLC, Atlanta, Georgia
,
David R. Mullineaux
3   School of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, England, United Kingdom
,
Eleonora Tamilia
4   Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Christos Papadelis
5   Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Peter J. Giannone
6   Department of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 March 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Neonatal feeding has been traditionally understudied so guidelines and evidence-based support for common feeding practices are limited. A major contributing factor to the paucity of evidence-based practice in this area has been the lack of simple-to-use, low-cost tools for monitoring sucking performance. We describe new methods for quantifying neonatal sucking performance that hold significant clinical and research promise. We present early results from an ongoing study investigating neonatal sucking as a marker of risk for adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. We include quantitative measures of sucking performance to better understand how movement variability evolves during skill acquisition. Results showed the coefficient of variation of suck duration was significantly different between preterm neonates at high risk for developmental concerns (HRPT) and preterm neonates at low risk for developmental concerns (LRPT). For HRPT, results indicated the coefficient of variation of suck smoothness increased from initial feeding to discharge and remained significantly greater than healthy full-term newborns (FT) at discharge. There was no significant difference in our measures between FT and LRPT at discharge. Our findings highlight the need to include neonatal sucking assessment as part of routine clinical care in order to capture the relative risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes at discharge.

Keywords

Premature neonate - suck behavior - nutritive sucking patterns - oral feeding - feeding skills
 

  • References

  • 1 Mizuno K, Ueda A. Neonatal feeding performance as a predictor of neurodevelopmental outcome at 18 months. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005; 47 (5) 299-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Holloway EM. The dynamic process of assessing infant feeding readiness. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 2014; 14 (3) 119-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Browne JV, Ross ES. Eating as a neurodevelopmental process for high-risk newborns. Clin Perinatol 2011; 38 (4) 731-743
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bertoncelli N, Cuomo G, Cattani S , et al. Oral feeding competences of healthy preterm infants: a review. Int J Pediatr 2012; 2012: 896257
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lau C. Interventions to improve oral feeding performance of preterm infants. Perspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders 2014; 23 (2) 23-45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Tamilia E, Taffoni F, Formica D , et al. Technological solutions and main indices for the assessment of newborns' nutritive sucking: a review. Sensors (Basel) 2014; 14 (1) 634-658
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lau C. Development of suck and swallow mechanisms in infants. Ann Nutr Metab 2015; 66 (Suppl. 05) 7-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Silberstein D, Geva R, Feldman R , et al. The transition to oral feeding in low-risk premature infants: relation to infant neurobehavioral functioning and mother-infant feeding interaction. Early Hum Dev 2009; 85 (3) 157-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Martinez-Biarge M, Diez-Sebastian J, Rutherford MA, Cowan FM. Outcomes after central grey matter injury in term perinatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Early Hum Dev 2010; 86 (11) 675-682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Fiori S, Guzzetta A. Plasticity following early-life brain injury: insights from quantitative MRI. Semin Perinatol 2015; 39 (2) 141-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gewolb IH, Vice FL. Maturational changes in the rhythms, patterning, and coordination of respiration and swallow during feeding in preterm and term infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006; 48 (7) 589-594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gewolb IH, Vice FL, Schwietzer-Kenney EL, Taciak VL, Bosma JF. Developmental patterns of rhythmic suck and swallow in preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001; 43 (1) 22-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Medoff-Cooper B, Shults J, Kaplan J. Sucking behavior of preterm neonates as a predictor of developmental outcomes. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2009; 30 (1) 16-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Tsai SW, Chen CH, Lin MC. Prediction for developmental delay on Neonatal Oral Motor Assessment Scale in preterm infants without brain lesion. Pediatr Int 2010; 52 (1) 65-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wolthuis-Stigter MI, Luinge MR, da Costa SP, Krijnen WP, van der Schans CP, Bos AF. The association between sucking behavior in preterm infants and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age. J Pediatr 2015; 166 (1) 26-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hiramoto A, Takagai S, Tsuchiya K , et al. Abnormal sucking behavior in infants as a predictor of developmental delay in 18-month or 3-year of age. Journal of Brain Science. 2014; 43: 5-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 da Costa SP, van der Schans CP. The reliability of the Neonatal Oral-Motor Assessment Scale. Acta Paediatr 2008; 97 (1) 21-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Shaker C. Cue-based co-regulated feeding in the neonatal intensive care unit: Supporting parents in learning to feed their preterm infant. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 2013; 13: 51-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Tamilia E, Delafield J, Fiore S, Taffoni F. An automatized system for the assessment of nutritive sucking behavior in infants: a preliminary analysis on term neonates. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2014; 2014: 5752-5755
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Tamilia E, Formica D, Scaini A, Taffoni F. An automated system for the analysis of newborns' oral-motor behavior. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Stergiou N, Decker LM. Human movement variability, nonlinear dynamics, and pathology: is there a connection?. Hum Mov Sci 2011; 30 (5) 869-888
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs HI , et al. Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J Neurosci 2002; 22 (18) 8297-8304
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Scheel CE, Schanler RJ, Lau C. Does the choice of bottle nipple affect the oral feeding performance of very-low-birthweight (VLBW) infants?. Acta Paediatr 2005; 94 (9) 1266-1272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Shaker CS. Cue-based feeding in the NICU: using the infant's communication as a guide. Neonatal Netw 2013; 32 (6) 404-408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Natarajan G, Shankaran S. Short- and long-term outcomes of moderate and late preterm infants. Am J Perinatol 2016; 33 (3) 305-317
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Horgan MJ. Management of the late preterm infant: not quite ready for prime time. Pediatr Clin North Am 2015; 62 (2) 439-451
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Pandit AS, Robinson E, Aljabar P , et al. Whole-brain mapping of structural connectivity in infants reveals altered connection strength associated with growth and preterm birth. Cereb Cortex 2014; 24 (9) 2324-2333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Nieuwenhuis T, da Costa SP, Bilderbeek E, Geven WB, van der Schans CP, Bos AF. Uncoordinated sucking patterns in preterm infants are associated with abnormal general movements. J Pediatr 2012; 161 (5) 792-798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar