Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33(05): 358-366
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1599076
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy on Flaps: A Systematic Review

Panxi Yu   *
1   The 16th Department, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
,
Nanze Yu   *
2   Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
,
Xiaonan Yang
1   The 16th Department, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
,
Xiaolei Jin
1   The 16th Department, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
,
Haibin Lu
1   The 16th Department, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
,
Zuoliang Qi
1   The 16th Department, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

30 June 2016

07 January 2017

Publication Date:
24 February 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Although flap transfer is a popular reconstructive procedure with a high success rate, it is associated with a high complication rate and low salvage rate. During the past decade, negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been increasingly applied to facilitate flap transfer and salvage flaps threatened by complications. It has achieved some success, but its efficacy and safety remain controversial because of the limited number of reports and lack of systematic reviews.

Methods English-language articles describing the application of NPWT on flaps were screened using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The articles were summarized and divided into groups based on the purpose of NPWT application. The complication rate, success rate, and salvage rate were obtained.

Results Among the 3,395 articles searched, 16 articles describing 137 flaps were eligible. NPWT was applied on 105 (76.4%) newly transferred flaps to facilitate flap attachment and on 32 (23.4%) complication-threatened flaps to relieve flap infection and venous congestion. In total, complications developed in six flaps, three of which were lost; thus, the complication rate was 5.7% (6/105) and the success rate was 97.1% (102/105). Only 1 of the 32 threatened flaps was not successfully salvaged; thus, the salvage rate was 96.9% (31/32).

Conclusion NPWT may facilitate flap transfer with few side effects and help to rescue flaps threatened by infection and venous congestion with a high salvage rate. Further studies are needed to test the safety of NPWT application on flaps with arterial compromise.

Keywords

negative-pressure wound therapy - flap - efficacy

* Both the authors contributed equally to this article.


 

  • References

  • 1 Costa DJ, Walen S, Varvares M, Walker R. Scalp rotation flap for reconstruction of complex soft tissue defects. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2016; 77 (1) 32-37
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wettstein R, Tremp M, Baumberger M, Schaefer DJ, Kalbermatten DF. Local flap therapy for the treatment of pressure sore wounds. Int Wound J 2015; 12 (5) 572-576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Li JH, Xing X, Liu HY, Li P, Xu J. Subcutaneous island pedicle flap: variations and versatility for facial reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 57 (3) 255-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Fang Z, Tian Z, Zhang C, Sun J, Hu J, He Y. Risk factors for pedicle flap complications in 251 elderly Chinese patients who underwent oral and maxillofacial reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74 (10) 2073-2080
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Mallet Y, El Bedoui S, Penel N, Ton Van J, Fournier C, Lefebvre JL. The free vascularized flap and the pectoralis major pedicled flap options: comparative results of reconstruction of the tongue. Oral Oncol 2009; 45 (12) 1028-1031
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Nangole WF, Khainga S, Aswani J, Kahoro L, Vilembwa A. Free flaps in a resource constrained environment: a five-year experience, outcomes and lessons learned. Plast Surg Int 2015; 2015: 194174
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Suh JD, Sercarz JA, Abemayor E , et al. Analysis of outcome and complications in 400 cases of microvascular head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (8) 962-966
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bianchi B, Copelli C, Ferrari S, Ferri A, Sesenna E. Free flaps: outcomes and complications in head and neck reconstructions. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2009; 37 (8) 438-442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Wu CC, Lin PY, Chew KY, Kuo YR. Free tissue transfers in head and neck reconstruction: complications, outcomes and strategies for management of flap failure: analysis of 2019 flaps in single institute. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (5) 339-344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Nakatsuka T, Harii K, Asato H , et al. Analytic review of 2372 free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19 (6) 363-368 , discussion 369
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Chou C, Kuo PJ, Chen YC , et al. Combination of vascular intervention surgery and free tissue transfer for critical diabetic limb salvage. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 77 (Suppl. 01) S16-S21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ma Z, Shou K, Li Z, Jian C, Qi B, Yu A. Negative pressure wound therapy promotes vessel destabilization and maturation at various stages of wound healing and thus influences wound prognosis. Exp Ther Med 2016; 11 (4) 1307-1317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Dwivedi MK, Srivastava RN, Bhagat AK , et al. Pressure ulcer management in paraplegic patients with a novel negative pressure device: a randomised controlled trial. J Wound Care 2016; 25 (4) 199-200 , 202–204, 206–207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Yusuf E, Jordan X, Clauss M, Borens O, Mäder M, Trampuz A. High bacterial load in negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) foams used in the treatment of chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2013; 21 (5) 677-681
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Chen SZ, Li J, Li XY, Xu LS. Effects of vacuum-assisted closure on wound microcirculation: an experimental study. Asian J Surg 2005; 28 (3) 211-217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Orgill DP, Manders EK, Sumpio BE , et al. The mechanisms of action of vacuum assisted closure: more to learn. Surgery 2009; 146 (1) 40-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Karaaslan F, Erdem Ş, Mermerkaya MU. Wound management with vacuum-assisted closure in postoperative infections after surgery for spinal stenosis. Int Med Case Rep J 2014; 8: 7-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wu CC, Chew KY, Chen CC, Kuo YR. Antimicrobial-impregnated dressing combined with negative-pressure wound therapy increases split-thickness skin graft engraftment: a simple effective technique. Adv Skin Wound Care 2015; 28 (1) 21-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Asher SA, White HN, Illing EA, Carroll WR, Magnuson JS, Rosenthal EL. Intraluminal negative pressure wound therapy for optimizing pharyngeal reconstruction. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 140 (2) 143-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Perentes JY, Abdelnour-Berchtold E, Blatter J , et al. Vacuum-assisted closure device for the management of infected postpneumonectomy chest cavities. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 149 (3) 745-750
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Patrut GV, Neamtu C, Ionac M. Leg for life? The use of sartorius muscle flap for the treatment of an infected vascular reconstructions after VA-ECMO use. A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2015; 16: 25-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Goldstein JA, Iorio ML, Brown B, Attinger CE. The use of negative pressure wound therapy for random local flaps at the ankle region. J Foot Ankle Surg 2010; 49 (6) 513-516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bannasch H, Iblher N, Penna V , et al. A critical evaluation of the concomitant use of the implantable Doppler probe and the Vacuum Assisted Closure system in free tissue transfer. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (6) 412-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Nelson JA, Kim EM, Serletti JM, Wu LC. A novel technique for lower extremity limb salvage: the vastus lateralis muscle flap with concurrent use of the vacuum-assisted closure device. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (7) 427-431
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Henry SL, Weinfeld AB, Sharma SK, Kelley PK. External Doppler monitoring of free flaps through negative pressure dressings. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011; 27 (4) 215-218
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Eisenhardt SU, Momeni A, Iblher N , et al. The use of the vacuum-assisted closure in microsurgical reconstruction revisited: application in the reconstruction of the posttraumatic lower extremity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (9) 615-622
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Eisenhardt SU, Schmidt Y, Thiele JR , et al. Negative pressure wound therapy reduces the ischaemia/reperfusion-associated inflammatory response in free muscle flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (5) 640-649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hanasono MM, Skoracki RJ. Securing skin grafts to microvascular free flaps using the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 58 (5) 573-576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lance S, Harrison L, Orbay H, Boudreault D, Pereira G, Sahar D. Assessing safety of negative-pressure wound therapy over pedicled muscle flaps: a retrospective review of gastrocnemius muscle flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (4) 519-523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kakarala K, Richmon JD, Lin DT, Deschler DG. Vacuum-assisted closure in revision free flap reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 137 (6) 622-624
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Scholl L, Chang E, Reitz B, Chang J. Sternal osteomyelitis: use of vacuum-assisted closure device as an adjunct to definitive closure with sternectomy and muscle flap reconstruction. J Card Surg 2004; 19 (5) 453-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Vaienti L, Gazzola R, Benanti E , et al. Failure by congestion of pedicled and free flaps for reconstruction of lower limbs after trauma: the role of negative-pressure wound therapy. J Orthop Traumatol 2013; 14 (3) 213-217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Yang YH, Jeng SF, Hsieh CH, Feng GM, Chen CC. Vacuum-assisted closure for complicated wounds in head and neck region after reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (8) e209-e216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Qiu SS, Hsu CC, Hanna SA , et al. Negative pressure wound therapy for the management of flaps with venous congestion. Microsurgery 2016; 36 (6) 467-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Uygur F, Duman H, Ulkür E, Ceiköz B. The role of the vacuum-assisted closure therapy in the salvage of venous congestion of the free flap: case report. Int Wound J 2008; 5 (1) 50-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Weinand C. The Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) device for hastened attachment of a superficial inferior-epigastric flap to third-degree burns on hand and fingers. J Burn Care Res 2009; 30 (2) 362-365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Pérez M, Sancho J, Ferrer C, García O, Barret JP. Management of flap venous congestion: the role of heparin local subcutaneous injection. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (1) 48-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Nguyen MQ, Crosby MA, Skoracki RJ, Hanasono MM. Outcomes of flap salvage with medicinal leech therapy. Microsurgery 2012; 32 (5) 351-357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Kairinos N, Solomons M, Hudson DA. The paradox of negative pressure wound therapy--in vitro studies. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (1) 174-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Kairinos N, Solomons M, Hudson DA. Negative-pressure wound therapy I: the paradox of negative-pressure wound therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (2) 589-598 , discussion 599–600
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Kairinos N, Voogd AM, Botha PH , et al. Negative-pressure wound therapy II: negative-pressure wound therapy and increased perfusion. Just an illusion?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (2) 601-612
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Timmers MS, Le Cessie S, Banwell P, Jukema GN. The effects of varying degrees of pressure delivered by negative-pressure wound therapy on skin perfusion. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 55 (6) 665-671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Malsiner CC, Schmitz M, Horch RE, Keller AK, Leffler M. Vessel transformation in chronic wounds under topical negative pressure therapy: an immunohistochemical analysis. Int Wound J 2015; 12 (5) 501-509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38 (6) 563-576 , discussion 577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Petzina R, Gustafsson L, Mokhtari A, Ingemansson R, Malmsjö M. Effect of vacuum-assisted closure on blood flow in the peristernal thoracic wall after internal mammary artery harvesting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30 (1) 85-89
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Frost MW, Niumsawatt V, Rozen WM, Eschen GE, Damsgaard TE, Kiil BJ. Direct comparison of postoperative monitoring of free flaps with microdialysis, implantable cook-swartz Doppler probe, and clinical monitoring in 20 consecutive patients. Microsurgery 2015; 35 (4) 262-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Chang EI, Ibrahim A, Zhang H , et al. Deciphering the sensitivity and specificity of the implantable Doppler in free flap monitoring. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (3) 971-976
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Mouës CM, Heule F, Hovius SE. A review of topical negative pressure therapy in wound healing: sufficient evidence?. Am J Surg 2011; 201 (4) 544-556
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Borgquist O, Ingemansson R, Malmsjö M. Individualizing the use of negative pressure wound therapy for optimal wound healing: a focused review of the literature. Ostomy Wound Manage 2011; 57 (4) 44-54
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Malmsjö M, Gustafsson L, Lindstedt S, Gesslein B, Ingemansson R. The effects of variable, intermittent, and continuous negative pressure wound therapy, using foam or gauze, on wound contraction, granulation tissue formation, and ingrowth into the wound filler. Eplasty 2012; 12: e5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar