Minimally Invasive Microscopic Posterior Cervical Decompression: Simple, Safe, and Effective

Abstract

Background and Study Aims Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in the elderly population. Surgery is usually successful in preventing any deterioration, as well as improving functional status and quality of life. This study assesses the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive microscopic posterior cervical decompression for the treatment of CSM.

Materials and Methods A retrospective review of patients with myelopathy from cervical stenosis treated with minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression was performed. The operation was performed through a nonexpandable tubular retractor and operating microscope.

Results Twelve patients were identified. There were no early or late complications. Average age was 74.5 years. Three patients were > 80 years of age and tolerated the operation extremely well. Three cases were two-level decompressions; nine were single level. Eight patients were operated on as elective cases, with average postoperative length of stay of 0.9 days. Average surgical time was 77.5 minutes per level. Postoperative neck pain was minimal (1.5/10). All patients improved postoperatively, particularly those who started with severe deficits. In fact, five patients were unable to walk preoperatively and were wheelchair- or bed-bound, and they returned to walking within weeks. The modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score improved from 8.4 (range: 4–14) to 13.5 (range: 10–15); the Nurick score changed from 3.8 (range: 2–5) to 2.3 (range: 1–4).

Conclusions Minimally invasive microscopic posterior cervical decompression is a safe and effective treatment for CSM in selected cases. Our initial experience highlights the potential benefits of this relatively new technique.

Keywords

minimally invasive - cervical - myelopathy - decompression - laminectomy

• References

• 1 Tracy JA, Bartleson JD. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurologist 2010; 16 (03) 176-187
• 2 Kalsi-Ryan S, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the clinical phenomenon and the current pathobiology of an increasingly prevalent and devastating disorder. Neuroscientist 2013; 19 (04) 409-421
• 3 Karadimas SK, Erwin WM, Ely CG, Dettori JR, Fehlings MG. Pathophysiology and natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 2013; 38 (22, Suppl 1): S21-S36
• 4 Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Kopjar B. , et al. Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (18) 1651-1658
• 5 Cheung WY, Arvinte D, Wong YW, Luk KD, Cheung KM. Neurological recovery after surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy—a prospective study. Int Orthop 2008; 32 (02) 273-278
• 6 Gok B, Sciubba DM, McLoughlin GS. , et al. Surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with anterior compression: a review of 67 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 2008; 9 (02) 152-157
• 7 Latimer M, Haden N, Seeley HM, Laing RJ. Measurement of outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated surgically. Br J Neurosurg 2002; 16 (06) 545-549
• 8 Al-Tamimi YZ, Guilfoyle M, Seeley H, Laing RJ. Measurement of long-term outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated surgically. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 (11) 2552-2557
• 9 Chiles III BW, Leonard MA, Choudhri HF, Cooper PR. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: patterns of neurological deficit and recovery after anterior cervical decompression. Neurosurgery 1999; 44 (04) 762-769 ; discussion 769–770
• 10 Ebersold MJ, Pare MC, Quast LM. Surgical treatment for cervical spondylitic myelopathy. J Neurosurg 1995; 82 (05) 745-751
• 11 Jalai CM, Worley N, Marascalchi BJ. , et al. The impact of advanced age on peri-operative outcomes in the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a nationwide study between 2001 and 2010. Spine 2016; 41 (03) E139-E147
• 12 Santiago P, Fessler RG. Minimally invasive surgery for the management of cervical spondylosis. Neurosurgery 2007; 60 ,(1 Supp1 1) S160-S165
• 13 Dahdaleh NS, Wong AP, Smith ZA, Wong RH, Lam SK, Fessler RG. Microendoscopic decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurg Focus 2013; 35 (01) E8
• 14 Minamide A, Yoshida M, Yamada H. , et al. Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J 2010; 19 (03) 487-493
• 15 Yabuki S, Kikuchi S. Endoscopic partial laminectomy for cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 2 (02) 170-174
• 16 McAllister BD, Rebholz BJ, Wang JC. Is posterior fusion necessary with laminectomy in the cervical spine?. Surg Neurol Int 2012; 3 (Suppl. 03) S225-S231
• 17 Wiggins GC, Shaffrey CI. Dorsal surgery for myelopathy and myeloradiculopathy. Neurosurgery 2007; 60 ,(1 Supp1 1) S71-S81
• 18 Mielke D, Rohde V. Bilateral spinal canal decompression via hemilaminectomy in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2015; 157 (10) 1813-1817
• 19 Xia XP, Chen HL, Cheng HB. Prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration after spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine 2013; 38 (07) 597-608
• 20 Oshima Y, Takeshita K, Inanami H. , et al. Cervical microendoscopic interlaminar decompression through a midline approach in patients with cervical myelopathy: a technical note. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2014; 75 (06) 474-478
• 21 Boehm H, Greiner-Perth R, El-Saghir H, Allam Y. A new minimally invasive posterior approach for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy: surgical technique and preliminary results. Eur Spine J 2003; 12 (03) 268-273
• 22 Hur JW, Kim JS, Shin MH, Ryu KS. Minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression using tubular retractor: the technical note and early clinical outcome. Surg Neurol Int 2014; 5: 34