Distance between Active Electrode Contacts and Dentatorubrothalamic Tract in Patients with Habituation of Stimulation Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation in Essential Tremor

Abstract

Background Some patients under thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor (ET) experience habituation of tremor reduction. The nucleus ventralis intermedius (Vim) is the current main target side for ET in DBS. However, the dentatorubrothalamic tract (DRTT) is considered the relevant structure to stimulate. We investigated the distance between the active contact of the DBS electrode and the DRTT and compared this distance in patients with habituation of tremor reduction and good responders.

Material and Methods In this retrospective study, we performed deterministic fiber tracking of the DRTT in 6 patients (12 hemispheres) with ET who underwent DBS in the Vim. We subsequently measured the distance between the active contact of the electrode and the ipsilateral DRTT in both hemispheres. The clinical tremor response of those 6 patients was analyzed accordingly.

Results The distance between the active contact and the DRTT in patients with better and constant clinical tremor reduction was shorter (mean distance: 2.9 ± 2.2 mm standard deviation [SD]) than in patients who showed habituation of their response (mean distance: 6.1 ± 3.9 mm SD). After re-placement of a thalamic electrode inside the DRTT in one patient who experienced unsatisfying tremor reduction due to habituation of stimulation, the tremor alleviation was significant and persistent at a 13-month follow-up.

Conclusion This retrospective analysis suggests that recurrence of ET tremor under chronic DBS might be associated with a larger distance between the DRTT and the active lead contact, in comparison with the smaller distances in patients with persistently good tremor control.

Keywords

essential tremor - dentatorubrothalamic tract - diffusion tensor imaging - deterministic fiber tracking - deep brain stimulation

• References

• 1 Benabid AL, Pollak P, Gao D. , et al. Chronic electrical stimulation of the ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus as a treatment of movement disorders. J Neurosurg 1996; 84 (02) 203-214
• 2 Koller WC, Lyons KE, Wilkinson SB, Troster AI, Pahwa R. Long-term safety and efficacy of unilateral deep brain stimulation of the thalamus in essential tremor. Mov Disord 2001; 16 (03) 464-468
• 3 Barbe MT, Liebhart L, Runge M. , et al. Deep brain stimulation in the nucleus ventralis intermedius in patients with essential tremor: habituation of tremor suppression. J Neurol 2011; 258 (03) 434-439
• 4 Hariz MI, Shamsgovara P, Johansson F, Hariz G, Fodstad H. Tolerance and tremor rebound following long-term chronic thalamic stimulation for Parkinsonian and essential tremor. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999; 72 (2-4): 208-218
• 5 Patel N, Ondo W, Jimenez-Shahed J. Habituation and rebound to thalamic deep brain stimulation in long-term management of tremor associated with demyelinating neuropathy. Int J Neurosci 2014; 124 (12) 919-925
• 6 Pilitsis JG, Metman LV, Toleikis JR, Hughes LE, Sani SB, Bakay RA. Factors involved in long-term efficacy of deep brain stimulation of the thalamus for essential tremor. J Neurosurg 2008; 109 (04) 640-646
• 7 Garcia Ruiz P, Muñiz de Igneson J, Lopez Ferro O, Martin C, Magariños Ascone C. Deep brain stimulation holidays in essential tremor. J Neurol 2001; 248 (08) 725-726
• 8 Kronenbuerger M, Fromm C, Block F. , et al. On-demand deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: a report on four cases. Mov Disord 2006; 21 (03) 401-405
• 9 Hamel W, Herzog J, Kopper F. , et al. Deep brain stimulation in the subthalamic area is more effective than nucleus ventralis intermedius stimulation for bilateral intention tremor. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2007; 149 (08) 749-758 ; discussion 758
• 10 Plaha P, Patel NK, Gill SS. Stimulation of the subthalamic region for essential tremor. J Neurosurg 2004; 101 (01) 48-54
• 11 Anthofer J, Steib K, Fellner C, Lange M, Brawanski A, Schlaier J. The variability of atlas-based targets in relation to surrounding major fibre tracts in thalamic deep brain stimulation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014; 156 (08) 1497-1504 ; discussion 1504
• 12 Coenen VA, Allert N, Mädler B. A role of diffusion tensor imaging fiber tracking in deep brain stimulation surgery: DBS of the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (drt) for the treatment of therapy-refractory tremor. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011; 153 (08) 1579-1585 ; discussion 1585
• 13 Coenen VA, Mädler B, Schiffbauer H, Urbach H, Allert N. Individual fiber anatomy of the subthalamic region revealed with diffusion tensor imaging: a concept to identify the deep brain stimulation target for tremor suppression. Neurosurgery 2011; 68 (04) 1069-1075 ; discussion 1075–1076
• 14 Sixel-Döring F, Benecke R, Fogel W. , et al; German Deep Brain Stimulation Association. Deep brain stimulation for essential tremor. Consensus recommendations of the German . Deep Brain Stimulation Association [in German]. Nervenarzt 2009; 80 (06) 662-665
• 15 Osenbach RK, Burchiel R. Thalamotomy: indications, techniques, and results. In: Germano IM. , ed. Neurosurgical Treatment of Movement Disorders. Park Ridge, IL: American Association of Neurological Surgeons; 1998: 107-129
• 16 Pinsker MO, Herzog J, Falk D, Volkmann J, Deuschl G, Mehdorn M. Accuracy and distortion of deep brain stimulation electrodes on postoperative MRI and CT. Zentralbl Neurochir 2008; 69 (03) 144-147
• 17 Kumar R, Lozano AM, Sime E, Lang AE. Long-term follow-up of thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential and parkinsonian tremor. Neurology 2003; 61 (11) 1601-1604
• 18 Benabid AL, Pollak P, Gervason C. , et al. Long-term suppression of tremor by chronic stimulation of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus. Lancet 1991; 337 (8738): 403-406
• 19 Papavassiliou E, Rau G, Heath S. , et al. Thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: relation of lead location to outcome. Neurosurgery 2004; 54 (05) 1120-1129 ; discussion 1129–1130
• 20 Schlaier J, Anthofer J, Steib K. , et al. Deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: targeting the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract?. Neuromodulation 2015; 18 (02) 105-112
• 21 Lazar M. Mapping brain anatomical connectivity using white matter tractography. NMR Biomed 2010; 23 (07) 821-835
• 22 Feigl GC, Hiergeist W, Fellner C. , et al. Magnetic resonance imaging diffusion tensor tractography: evaluation of anatomic accuracy of different fiber tracking software packages. World Neurosurg 2014; 81 (01) 144-150
• 23 Bürgel U, Mädler B, Honey CR, Thron A, Gilsbach J, Coenen VA. Fiber tracking with distinct software tools results in a clear diversity in anatomical fiber tract portrayal. Cent Eur Neurosurg 2009; 70 (01) 27-35
• 24 Bucci M, Mandelli ML, Berman JI. , et al. Quantifying diffusion MRI tractography of the corticospinal tract in brain tumors with deterministic and probabilistic methods. Neuroimage Clin 2013; 3: 361-368
• 25 Kwon HG, Hong JH, Hong CP, Lee DH, Ahn SH, Jang SH. Dentatorubrothalamic tract in human brain: diffusion tensor tractography study. Neuroradiology 2011; 53 (10) 787-791
• 26 Beaulieu C. The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system - a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002; 15 (7-8): 435-455
• 27 Said N, Elias WJ, Raghavan P. , et al. Correlation of diffusion tensor tractography and intraoperative macrostimulation during deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease. J Neurosurg 2014; 121 (04) 929-935
• 28 Coenen VA, Allert N, Paus S, Kronenbürger M, Urbach H, Mädler B. Modulation of the cerebello-thalamo-cortical network in thalamic deep brain stimulation for tremor: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Neurosurgery 2014; 75 (06) 657-669 ; discussion 669–670
• 29 Mädler B, Coenen VA. Explaining clinical effects of deep brain stimulation through simplified target-specific modeling of the volume of activated tissue. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33 (06) 1072-1080
• 30 Chaturvedi A, Luján JL, McIntyre CC. Artificial neural network based characterization of the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation. J Neural Eng 2013; 10 (05) 056023