Retirement Age Ranges from Clinical Practice of Maternal–Fetal Medicine Physicians

Abstract

Objectives Retirement of “baby boomer” physicians is a matter of growing concern in light of the shortage of certain physician groups. The objectives of this investigation were to define what constitutes a customary retirement age range of maternal–fetal medicine (MFM) physicians and examine how that compares with other obstetrician–gynecologist (ob-gyn) specialists.

Study Design This descriptive study was based on American Medical Association Masterfile survey data from 2010 to 2014. Data from the National Provider Identifier were used to correct for upward bias in reporting retirement ages. Only physicians engaged in direct patient care between ages 55 and 80 years were included. Primary outcomes involved comparisons of retirement ages of male and female physicians with other ob-gyn specialties.

Results Interquartile ranges of retirement ages were similar between specialists in MFM (64.1–71.1), gynecologic oncology (62.1–68.9), reproductive endocrinology and infertility (64.1–71.7), and general ob-gyn (61.5–67.9). In every specialty, women retired earlier, while males in MFM were most likely to retire at the oldest age (median 70.0).

Conclusion MFM physicians usually retired from clinical practice between ages 64 and 71 years, which is similar to other ob-gyn specialists. Females retired earlier, however, which may impact the overall supply as more females pursue MFM careers.

Keywords

age - clinical practice - retirement - maternal–fetal medicine

Note

This study was presented at the 36th Annual Pregnancy Meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Atlanta, GA, February 6, 2016.

• References

• 1 Rayburn WF. The Obstetrician-Gyncologist Workforce in the United States: Facts, Figures, and Implications, 2001. Washington, DC: ACOG Press; 2011
• 2 Dall TM, Chakrabarti R, Storm MV, Elwell EC, Rayburn WF. Estimated demand for women's health services by 2020. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2013; 22 (7) 643-648
• 3 Tyner JE, Rayburn WF. Long-term trends in applicants for maternal-fetal medicine fellowship positions. Am J Perinatol 2014; 31 (10) 923-925
• 4 Rayburn WF, Gant NF, Gilstrap LC, Elwell EC, Williams SB. Pursuit of accredited subspecialties by graduating residents in obstetrics and gynecology, 2000-2012. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 (3) 619-625
• 5 American Medical Association. AMA Physician Masterfile. 2015. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/about-ama/physician-data-resources/physician-masterfile.page . Accessed January 20, 2016
• 6 Bindman AB. Using the National Provider Identifier for health care workforce evaluation. Medicare Medicaid Res Rev 2013; 3 (3) e1-e10
• 7 Petterson SM, Rayburn WF, Liaw WR. When do primary care physicians retire? Implications for workforce projections. Ann Fam Med 2016; 14 (4) 344-349
• 8 Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. SMFM State of Pregnancy Monograph, 2nd Ed. 2016. Available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/cdn.smfm.org/publications/186/download-5739db8fcbea94a27e43e8bcb4cd2e3e.pdf . Accessed January 20, 2016
• 9 Rayburn WF, Strunk AL, Petterson SM. Considerations about retirement from clinical practice by obstetrician-gynecologists. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213 (3) 335.e1-335.e4
• 10 Keeton K, Fenner DE, Johnson TR, Hayward RA. Predictors of physician career satisfaction, work-life balance, and burnout. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109 (4) 949-955
• 11 Pearse WH, Horton JA. Retirement patterns of obstetricians and gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77 (3) 463-464