The Varicocele: Clinical Presentation, Evaluation, and Surgical Management

Abstract

A varicocele is an abnormal dilatation and tortuosity of the veins of the spermatic cord. Although varicoceles are common in the general population and are frequently found on routine physical examinations, they represent the most common correctable cause of male factor infertility. Varicoceles are also often incidental findings on imaging studies, particularly scrotal ultrasound. Importantly, not all varicoceles should be treated equally (or at all), and basic guidelines on the evaluation and indications for treatment of adult varicoceles should be reviewed before counseling and treatment. A semen analysis should be obtained for any male patient of reproductive age considering intervention. The adolescent varicocele is managed much differently than the adult varicocele and remains a source of controversy. This review describes the clinical presentation and the evaluation of adult and pediatric varicoceles, and provides guidance on their diagnosis and workup. It also describes options for surgical repair and the success and complication rates associated with each surgical approach, ultimately supporting microsurgical subinguinal varicocele repair as the current surgical standard.

Keywords

varicocele - varicocelectomy - infertility - interventional radiology

• References

• 1 Nagler HM, Martinis FG. Varicocele. In: Lipshultz LI, Howards SS, , eds. Infertility in the Male. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1997: 336-359
• 2 Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Cocuzza M , et al. Efficacy of varicocelectomy in improving semen parameters: new meta-analytical approach. Urology 2007; 70 (3) 532-538
• 3 Masson P, Brannigan RE. The varicocele. Urol Clin North Am 2014; 41 (1) 129-144
• 4 Trum JW, Gubler FM, Laan R, van der Veen F. The value of palpation, varicoscreen contact thermography and colour Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of varicocele. Hum Reprod 1996; 11 (6) 1232-1235
• 5 Pilatz A, Altinkilic B, Köhler E, Marconi M, Weidner W. Color Doppler ultrasound imaging in varicoceles: is the venous diameter sufficient for predicting clinical and subclinical varicocele?. World J Urol 2011; 29 (5) 645-650
• 6 Stahl P, Schlegel PN. Standardization and documentation of varicocele evaluation. Curr Opin Urol 2011; 21 (6) 500-505
• 7 Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Society for Male Reproduction and Urology. Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2014; 102 (6) 1556-1560
• 8 Abdel-Meguid TA, Farsi HM, Al-Sayyad A, Tayib A, Mosli HA, Halawani AH. Effects of varicocele on serum testosterone and changes of testosterone after varicocelectomy: a prospective controlled study. Urology 2014; 84 (5) 1081-1087
• 9 Hsiao W, Rosoff JS, Pale JR, Powell JL, Goldstein M. Varicocelectomy is associated with increases in serum testosterone independent of clinical grade. Urology 2013; 81 (6) 1213-1217
• 10 Tanrikut C, Goldstein M, Rosoff JS, Lee RK, Nelson CJ, Mulhall JP. Varicocele as a risk factor for androgen deficiency and effect of repair. BJU Int 2011; 108 (9) 1480-1484
• 11 Yamamoto M, Hibi H, Hirata Y, Miyake K, Ishigaki T. Effect of varicocelectomy on sperm parameters and pregnancy rate in patients with subclinical varicocele: a randomized prospective controlled study. J Urol 1996; 155 (5) 1636-1638
• 12 Unal D, Yeni E, Verit A, Karatas OF. Clomiphene citrate versus varicocelectomy in treatment of subclinical varicocele: a prospective randomized study. Int J Urol 2001; 8 (5) 227-230
• 13 Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J , et al; International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology; World Health Organization. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril 2009; 92 (5) 1520-1524
• 14 Schlegel PN. Is assisted reproduction the optimal treatment for varicocele-associated male infertility? A cost-effectiveness analysis. Urology 1997; 49 (1) 83-90
• 15 Weedin JW, Khera M, Lipshultz LI. Varicocele repair in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia: a meta-analysis. J Urol 2010; 183 (6) 2309-2315
• 16 Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S , et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16 (3) 231-245
• 17 Lee YJ, Cho SY, Paick JS, Kim SW. Usefulness of 2010 world health organization reference values for determining indications for varicocelectomy. Urology 2015; 85 (4) 831-835
• 18 Karademir K, Senkul T, Baykal K, Ateş F, Işeri C, Erden D. Evaluation of the role of varicocelectomy including external spermatic vein ligation in patients with scrotal pain. Int J Urol 2005; 12 (5) 484-488
• 19 Al-Buheissi SZ, Patel HR, Wazait HD, Miller RA, Nathan S. Predictors of success in surgical ligation of painful varicocele. Urol Int 2007; 79 (1) 33-36
• 20 Abd Ellatif ME, Asker W, Abbas A , et al. Varicocelectomy to treat pain, and predictors of success: a prospective study. Curr Urol 2012; 6 (1) 33-36
• 21 Chiba K, Ramasamy R, Lamb DJ , et al. The varicocele: diagnostic dilemmas, therapeutic challenges and future perspectives. Asian J Androl 2016; 18 (2) 276-281
• 22 Sakamoto H, Saito K, Oohta M, Inoue K, Ogawa Y, Yoshida H. Testicular volume measurement: comparison of ultrasonography, orchidometry, and water displacement. Urology 2007; 69 (1) 152-157
• 23 Kass EJ. The adolescent varicocele: treatment and outcome. Curr Urol Rep 2002; 3 (2) 100-106
• 24 Li F, Chiba K, Yamaguchi K , et al. Effect of varicocelectomy on testicular volume in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Urology 2012; 79 (6) 1340-1345
• 25 Diamond DA, Zurakowski D, Bauer SB , et al. Relationship of varicocele grade and testicular hypotrophy to semen parameters in adolescents. J Urol 2007; 178 (4, Pt 2): 1584-1588
• 26 Kurtz MP, Zurakowski D, Rosoklija I , et al. Semen parameters in adolescents with varicocele: association with testis volume differential and total testis volume. J Urol 2015; 193 (5, Suppl): 1843-1847
• 27 Poon SA, Gjertson CK, Mercado MA, Raimondi PM, Kozakowski KA, Glassberg KI. Testicular asymmetry and adolescent varicoceles managed expectantly. J Urol 2010; 183 (2) 731-734
• 28 Fine RG, Gitlin J, Reda EF , et al. Barriers to use of semen analysis in the adolescent with a varicocele: survey of patient, parental, and practitioner attitudes. J Pediatr Urol 2015; 12 (1) e1-e6
• 29 Hussein AF. The role of color Doppler ultrasound in prediction of the outcome of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy. J Urol 2006; 176 (5) 2141-2145
• 30 Kozakowski KA, Gjertson CK, Decastro GJ, Poon S, Gasalberti A, Glassberg KI. Peak retrograde flow: a novel predictor of persistent, progressive and new onset asymmetry in adolescent varicocele. J Urol 2009; 181 (6) 2717-2722 , discussion 2723
• 31 Palomo A. Radical cure of varicocele by a new technique; preliminary report. J Urol 1949; 61 (3) 604-607
• 32 Ivanissevich O. Left varicocele due to reflux; experience with 4,470 operative cases in forty-two years. J Int Coll Surg 1960; 34: 742-755
• 33 Zhang H, Li H, Hou Y , et al. Microscopic retroperitoneal varicocelectomy with artery and lymphatic sparing: an alternative treatment for varicocele in infertile men. Urology 2015; 86 (3) 511-515
• 34 Ding H, Tian J, Du W, Zhang L, Wang H, Wang Z. Open non-microsurgical, laparoscopic or open microsurgical varicocelectomy for male infertility: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BJU Int 2012; 110 (10) 1536-1542
• 35 Wang J, Xia SJ, Liu ZH , et al. Inguinal and subinguinal micro-varicocelectomy, the optimal surgical management of varicocele: a meta-analysis. Asian J Androl 2015; 17 (1) 74-80
• 36 Gontero P, Pretti G, Fontana F, Zitella A, Marchioro G, Frea B. Inguinal versus subinguinal varicocele vein ligation using magnifying loupe under local anesthesia: which technique is preferable in clinical practice?. Urology 2005; 66 (5) 1075-1079
• 37 Pan F, Pan L, Zhang A, Liu Y, Zhang F, Dai Y. Comparison of two approaches in microsurgical varicocelectomy in Chinese infertile males. Urol Int 2013; 90 (4) 443-448
• 38 Marmar JL, Agarwal A, Prabakaran S , et al. Reassessing the value of varicocelectomy as a treatment for male subfertility with a new meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2007; 88 (3) 639-648
• 39 Cayan S, Shavakhabov S, Kadioğlu A. Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men: a meta-analysis to define the best technique. J Androl 2009; 30 (1) 33-40
• 40 Beck EM, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: a macroscopic and microscopic study. J Urol 1992; 148 (4) 1190-1194
• 41 Cayan S, Acar D, Ulger S , et al. Adolescent varicocele repair: long-term results and comparison of surgical techniques according to optical magnification use in 100 cases at a single university hospital. J Urol 2005; 174 (5) 2003-2006 ; discussion 2006–2007
• 42 Al-Kandari AM, Shabaan H, Ibrahim HM, Elshebiny YH, Shokeir AA. Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Urology 2007; 69 (3) 417-420
• 43 Al-Said S, Al-Naimi A, Al-Ansari A , et al. Varicocelectomy for male infertility: a comparative study of open, laparoscopic and microsurgical approaches. J Urol 2008; 180 (1) 266-270
• 44 Watanabe M, Nagai A, Kusumi N, Tsuboi H, Nasu Y, Kumon H. Minimal invasiveness and effectivity of subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a comparative study with retroperitoneal high and laparoscopic approaches. Int J Urol 2005; 12 (10) 892-898
• 45 Kolon TF. Evaluation and management of the adolescent varicocele. J Urol 2015; 194 (5) 1194-1201
• 46 Punekar SV, Prem AR, Ridhorkar VR, Deshmukh HL, Kelkar AR. Post-surgical recurrent varicocele: efficacy of internal spermatic venography and steel-coil embolization. Br J Urol 1996; 77 (1) 124-128
• 47 Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocele size and results of varicocelectomy in selected subfertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril 1970; 21 (8) 606-609
• 48 Kass EJ, Stork BR, Steinert BW. Varicocele in adolescence induces left and right testicular volume loss. BJU Int 2001; 87 (6) 499-501