Am J Perinatol 2016; 33(10): 945-950
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1582127
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Association between Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter Insertion Site and Complication Rates in Preterm Infants

Authors

  • Rani A. Bashir

    1   Section of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Kamala Swarnam

    1   Section of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Sakeer Vayalthrikkovil

    1   Section of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Wendy Yee

    1   Section of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Amuchou S. Soraisham

    1   Section of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    2   Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Further Information

Publication History

01 January 2016

19 February 2016

Publication Date:
08 April 2016 (online)

Abstract

Objective To examine whether there is an association between peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) insertion site and complication rates among preterm infants.

Design We performed a retrospective analysis of the first PICCs placed in preterm infants in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit between January 2006 and December 2010. The PICC-related complications resulting in catheter removal were compared based on site of insertion.

Results Of the 827 PICCs, 593 (72%) were inserted in upper extremity. Lower extremity PICC group infants had higher illness severity (SNAP-II) score and more likely to be inserted later as compared with the upper extremity group. There was no significant difference in the total PICC-related complications between upper and lower extremity PICCs (31.3 vs. 26%; p > 0.05). Logistic regression analysis after adjusting for gestational age, day of line insertion, and SNAP-II score revealed that upper extremity PICCs were associated with increased risk of line infiltration (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36–4.29) but not the total PICC complication (aOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.91–1.83).

Conclusion There is no difference in total PICC-related complication between upper and lower extremity PICCs; however, the PICC-related mechanical complications vary depending on the site of insertion in preterm infants.