A Simple, Visually Oriented Communication System to Improve Postoperative Care Following Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer: Development, Results, and Implications

Abstract

Background Communication, particularly transmission of information between the surgical and nursing teams, has been identified as one of the most crucial determinants of patient outcomes. Nonetheless, transfer of information among and between the physician and nursing teams in the immediate postoperative period is often informal, verbal, and inconsistent.

Methods An iterative process of multidisciplinary information gathering was undertaken to create a novel postoperative communication system (the “Pop-form”). Once developed, nurses were surveyed on multiple measures regarding the perceived likelihood that it would improve their ability to provide directed patient care. Data were quantified using a Likert scale (0–10), and statistically analyzed.

Results The Pop-form records and transfers operative details, specific anatomic monitoring parameters, and senior physician contact information. Sixty-eight nurses completed surveys. The perceived usefulness of different components of the Pop-form system was as follows: 8.9 for the description of the procedure; 9.3 for the operative diagram; 9.4 for the monitoring details and parameters; and 9.4 for the direct contact information for the appropriate surgical team member. All respondents were in favor of widespread adoption of the Pop-form.

Conclusion This uniform, visual communication system requires less than 1 minute to compose, yet formalizes and standardizes inter-team communication, and therefore shows promise for improving outcomes following microvascular free tissue transfer. We believe that this simple, innovative communication tool has the potential to be more broadly applied to many other health care settings.

Keywords

inter-team communication - free tissue transfer - postoperative monitoring

• References

• 1 Institute of Medicine. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health Care System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999
• 2 Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR , et al; Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009; 360 (5) 491-499
• 3 Liddle C. Principles of monitoring postoperative patients. Nurs Times 2013; 109 (22) 24-26
• 4 Nagpal K, Vats A, Lamb B , et al. Information transfer and communication in surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2010; 252 (2) 225-239
• 5 Berenholtz SM, Milanovich S, Faircloth A , et al. Improving care for the ventilated patient. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 2004; 30 (4) 195-204
• 6 Jungquist CR, Pasero C, Tripoli NM, Gorodetsky R, Metersky M, Polomano RC. Instituting best practice for monitoring for opioid-induced advancing sedation in hospitalized patients. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2014; 11 (6) 350-360
• 7 Anwari JS. Quality of handover to the postanesthesia care unit nurse. Anaesthesia 2002; 57 (5) 488-493
• 8 Siddiqui N, Arzola C, Iqbal M , et al. Deficits in information transfer between anaesthesiologist and postanaesthesia care unit staff: an analysis of patient handover. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2012; 29 (9) 438-445
• 9 Smith AF, Pope C, Goodwin D, Mort M. Interprofessional handover and patient safety in anaesthesia: observational study of handovers in the recovery room. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101 (3) 332-337
• 10 Manser T, Foster S, Flin R, Patey R. Team communication during patient handover from the operating room: more than facts and figures. Hum Factors 2013; 55 (1) 138-156
• 11 Ong MS, Coiera E. A systematic review of failures in handoff communication during intrahospital transfers. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2011; 37 (6) 274-284
• 12 Berenholtz SM, Lubomski LH, Weeks K , et al; On the CUSP: Stop BSI program. Eliminating central line-associated bloodstream infections: a national patient safety imperative. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014; 35 (1) 56-62
• 13 Kachare SD, Sanders C, Myatt K, Fitzgerald TL, Zervos EE. Toward eliminating catheter-associated urinary tract infections in an academic health center. J Surg Res 2014; 192 (2) 280-285
• 14 Thomas CM, Bertram E, Johnson D. The SBAR communication technique: teaching nursing students professional communication skills. Nurse Educ 2009; 34 (4) 176-180
• 15 Pope BB, Rodzen L, Spross G. Raising the SBAR: how better communication improves patient outcomes. Nursing 2008; 38 (3) 41-43
• 16 Catchpole K, Sellers R, Goldman A, McCulloch P, Hignett S. Patient handovers within the hospital: translating knowledge from motor racing to healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 (4) 318-322
• 17 Roberts KH. Cultural characteristics of reliability enhancing organizations. J Manag Issue 1993; 5 (2) 165-181
• 18 Tuckey J. Transfer of patients to recovery room staff. Anaesthesia 1995; 50 (1) 86-87
• 19 Tucker AL, Heisler WS, Janisse LD. Designed for workarounds: a qualitative study of the causes of operational failures in hospitals. Perm J 2014; 18 (3) 33-41