Return to Play: Wer entscheidet?

Zusammenfassung

BEZIEHUNGSDYNAMIK: Als Pep Guardiola Thiago ohne Absprache zur Behandlung nach Barcelona schickte, eskalierte sein Machtkampf mit Hans-Wilhelm Müller-Wohlfahrt endgültig. Der Mannschaftsarzt sprach von zerrüttetem Vertrauen und verließ den FC Bayern. Derartige Konflikte kennt unser Experte Ian Shrier. Der kanadische Sportmediziner forscht zum Thema und wollte wissen, wen die Vertreter der involvierten Berufsgruppen für die Return-to-Play-Entscheidung am geeignetsten halten.

• Literatur

• 1 Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making – pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med 2012; 366 (9) 780-1
• 2 Creighton DW, Shrier I, Shultz R et al. Return-to-play in sport: A decision-based model. Clin J Sport Med 2010; 20 (5) 379-385
• 3 Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM et al. Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67 (4) 401-9
• 4 Gabe J, Bury M, Elston MA, eds. Key concepts in medical sociology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2004
• 5 The team physician and return-to-play issues: A consensus statement. [No authors listed.] Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34 (7) 1212-4 PMID:12131265
• 6 Nixon HL. Accepting the risks of pain and injury in sport: Mediated cultural influences of playing hurt. Sociol Sport J 1993; 10: 183-196
• 7 Nixon HL. Coaches’ views of risk, pain and injury in sport, with special reference to gender differences. Sociol Sport J 1994; 11: 79-87
• 8 Obama On NFL Concussions: „I Would Not Let My Son Play Pro Football”. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/19/obama-nfl-concussions_n_4627866.html Stand: 02.01.2015
• 9 Podlog L, Eklund RC. A longitudinal investigation of competitive athletes’ return to sport following serious injury. J Appl Sport Psych 2006; 18 (1) 44-68
• 10 Podlog L, Eklund RC. Professional coaches’ perspectives on the return to sport following serious injury. J Appl Sport Psych 2007; 19 (2) 207-225
• 11 Podlog L, Eklund RC. The psychosocial aspects of a return to sport following serious injury: A review of the literature from a self-determination perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2007; 8: 535-566
• 12 Safai P. Healing the body in the „culture of risk”: Examining the negotiation of treatment between sport medicine clinicians and injured athletes in Canadian Intercollegiate Sport. Sociol Sport J 2003; 20: 127-146
• 13 Shrier I, Matheson GO, Boudier-Riveret M et al. Validating the 3-step return to play decision model. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2014; [in press]
• 14 Shrier I, Safai P, Charland L. Return-to-play following injury: Whose decision should it be?. Br J Sports Med 2014; 48: 394-401
• 15 Shrier I. Return to play decison making. In: Brukner P, Khan KM, editors Clinical Sports Medicine. 2015
• 16 Shrier I. The strategic assessment of risk and risk tolerance (StAART) framework for return to play decision making. Br J Sports Med 2015; 2 [Epub ahead of print]
• 17 Shultz R, Bido J, Shrier I et al. Team clinician variability in return-to-play decisions. Clin J Sport Med 2013; 23 (6) 456-461
• 18 Wiese-Bjornstal DM, Smith AM, Shaffer SM et al. An integrated model of response to sport injury: Psychological and sociological dynamics. J Appl Sport Psych 1998; 10: 46-69
• 19 Young K, White P, McTeer W. Body talk: Male athletes reflect on sport, injury, and pain. Sociol Sport J 1994; 11: 175-194