Aktuelle Aspekte der dentalen Lokalanästhesie

Lernziele

Nach dem Durcharbeiten des Artikels sollte der Leser

• Grundkenntnisse zu den Lokalanästhetika mit den jeweiligen Additiven aufgefrischt haben,

• neue Erkenntnisse bezüglich des Vergleichs von Articain und Lidocain besitzen,

• Informationen über eine mögliche Antagonisierung der Adrenalinwirkung gewonnen haben und

• Innovationen von Injektionstechniken und Applikationsarten dentaler Lokalanästhetika kennen.

• Literatur

• 1 Daubländer M, Müller R, Lipp MD. The incidence of complications associated with local anesthesia in dentistry. Anesth Prog 1997; 44: 132-141
• 2 Snoeck M. Articaine: a review of its use for local and regional anesthesia. Local Reg Anesth 2012; 5: 23-33
• 3 Srinivasan N, Kavitha M, Loganathan CS et al. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: 133-136
• 4 Becker DE, Reed KL. Local anesthetics: review of pharmacological considerations. Anesth Prog 2012; 59: 90-101
• 5 Ahrens J, Leffler A. Update zu Pharmakologie und Wirkung von Lokalanästhetika. Anaesthesist 2014; 63: 376-386
• 6 Hogan ME, van der Vaart S, Perampaladas K et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of warming local anesthetics on injection pain. Ann Emerg Med 2011; 58: 86-98
• 7 Zeltser R, Cohen C, Casap N. The implications of a broken needle in the pterygomandibular space: clinical guidelines for prevention and retrieval. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 153-156
• 8 Malamed SF, Falkel M. Advances in local anesthetics: pH buffering and dissolved CO2. Dent Today 2012; 31: 88-93
• 9 Gouws P, Galloway P, Jacob J et al. Comparison of articaine and bupivacaine/lidocaine for sub-Tenon’s anaesthesia in cataract extraction. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 228-230
• 10 Leuschner J, Leblanc D. Studies on the toxicological profile of the local anaesthetic articaine. Arzneimittelforschung 1999; 49: 126-132
• 11 Vree TB, Gielen MJ. Clinical pharmacology and the use of articaine for local and regional anaesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2005; 19: 293-308
• 12 Sood R, Hans MK, Shetty S. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Clin Exp Dent 2014; 6: e520-e523
• 13 Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 2012; 38: 279-282
• 14 Friedl CC, Bashutski J, Rashidi N. A comparison of equivalent doses of lidocaine and articaine in maxillary posterior tooth extractions: case series. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2012; 3: e4
• 15 Tortamano IP, Siviero M, Costa CG et al. A comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 2009; 35: 165-168
• 16 Hassan S, Rao BH, Sequeria J et al. Efficacy of 4% articaine hydrochloride and 2% lignocaine hydrochloride in the extraction of maxillary premolars for orthodontic reasons. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2011; 1: 14-18
• 17 Evans G, Nusstein J, Drum M et al. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations. J Endod 2008; 34: 389-393
• 18 Al-Dosary K, Al-Qahtani A, Alangari A. Anaphylaxis to lidocaine with tolerance to articaine in a 12 year old girl. Saudi Pharm J 2014; 22: 280-282
• 19 Jenerowicz D, Polanska A, Glinska O et al. Allergy to lidocaine injections: comparison of patient history with skin testing in five patients. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 2014; 31: 134-138
• 20 Kämmerer PW, Palarie V, Daubländer M et al. Comparison of 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) and without epinephrine in inferior alveolar block for tooth extraction: double-blind randomized clinical trial of anesthetic efficacy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012; 113: 495-499
• 21 Kämmerer PW, Seeling J, Alshihri A et al. Comparative clinical evaluation of different epinephrine concentrations in 4% articaine for dental local infiltration anesthesia. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 415-421
• 22 Kämmerer PW, Krämer N, Esch J et al. Epinephrine-reduced articaine solution (1:400,000) in paediatric dentistry: a multicentre non-interventional clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2013; 14: 89-95
• 23 Laviola M, McGavin SK, Freer GA et al. Randomized study of phentolamine mesylate for reversal of local anesthesia. J Dent Res 2008; 87: 635-639
• 24 Yagiela JA. What’s new with phentolamine mesylate: a reversal agent for local anaesthesia?. SAAD Dig 2011; 27: 3-7
• 25 Prasanna JS. OraVerse: Reverses Numbness After Dental Procedures. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2012; 11: 212-219
• 26 Shabazfar N, Daubländer M, Al-Nawas B et al. Periodontal intraligament injection as alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block – meta-analysis of the literature from 1979 to 2012. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 351-358
• 27 Kämmerer PW, Schiegnitz E, von Haussen T et al. Clinical efficacy of a computerised device (STA) and a pressure syringe (VarioJect INTRA) for intraligamentary anaesthesia. Eur J Dent Educ 2015; 19: 16-22
• 28 Saxena P, Gupta SK, Newaskar V et al. Advances in dental local anesthesia techniques and devices: An update. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2013; 4: 19-24