J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32(02): 153-159
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564061
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Submental Artery Flap with Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Reconstruction of Oral Cancer

Annastiina Husso
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
,
Sinikka Suominen
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
,
Tahsin Oguz Acarturk
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
,
Leif Bäck
2   Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
,
Patrik Lassus
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
,
Jyrki Vuola
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
,
Antti Mäkitie
2   Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
3   Division of Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

11 May 2015

23 July 2015

Publication Date:
15 September 2015 (online)

Abstract

Background Microvascular free flaps form the gold standard for reconstruction of defects after intraoral cancer surgery, but not all patients are suitable candidates for microsurgery. The submental artery flap is an alternative to free tissue transfer especially in patients who do not tolerate extensive operations due to major comorbidities. However, in metastatic neck disease, this option has not been recommended due to theoretical intraoral transfer of cancer cells. The aim of this study was to consider the indications and benefits of the submental artery perforator flap in patients with intraoral cancer.

Methods Ten patients with early (N = 2) or locally advanced (N = 8) intraoral cancer, who were not candidates for free tissue transfer because of major comorbidities, were managed with tumor resection and coverage of the defect with the submental artery flap. The minimum follow-up time for all patients was 6 years.

Results The average defect size was 5 × 9 cm. Two patients developed major complications and one of them had a flap loss. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was used in three cases to rule out positive neck disease close to the flap pedicle. During the follow-up time 6 out of 10 patients had a local recurrence and there were no appearances of metastatic neck disease.

Conclusion The submental artery flap is an alternative option to intraoral microvascular reconstruction in patients with major comorbidities. Sentinel lymph node biopsy can be used as an adjunct to enhance oncological safety.

 
  • References

  • 1 Martin D, Pascal JF, Baudet J , et al. The submental island flap: a new donor site. Anatomy and clinical applications as a free or pedicled flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92 (5) 867-873
  • 2 Sterne GD, Januszkiewicz JS, Hall PN, Bardsley AF. The submental island flap. Br J Plast Surg 1996; 49 (2) 85-89
  • 3 Chow TL, Chan TT, Chow TK, Fung SC, Lam SH. Reconstruction with submental flap for aggressive orofacial cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (2) 431-436
  • 4 Pistre V, Pelissier P, Martin D, Lim A, Baudet J. Ten years of experience with the submental flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (6) 1576-1581
  • 5 Karaçal N, Ambarcioglu O, Topal U, Sapan LA, Kutlu N. Reverse-flow submental artery flap for periorbital soft tissue and socket reconstruction. Head Neck 2006; 28 (1) 40-45
  • 6 Abouchadi A, Capon-Degardin N, Patenôtre P, Martinot-Duquennoy V, Pellerin P. The submental flap in facial reconstruction: advantages and limitations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65 (5) 863-869
  • 7 Chen WL, Li JS, Yang ZH, Huang ZQ, Wang JU, Zhang B. Two submental island flaps for reconstructing oral and maxillofacial defects following cancer ablation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66 (6) 1145-1156
  • 8 Zhang B, Wang JG, Chen WL, Yang ZH, Huang ZQ. Reverse facial-submental artery island flap for reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects following middle and advanced-stage carcinoma ablation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 49 (3) 194-197
  • 9 Sebastian P, Thomas S, Varghese BT, Iype EM, Balagopal PG, Mathew PC. The submental island flap for reconstruction of intraoral defects in oral cancer patients. Oral Oncol 2008; 44 (11) 1014-1018
  • 10 Vural E, Suen JY. The submental island flap in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 2000; 22 (6) 572-578
  • 11 Multinu A, Ferrari S, Bianchi B , et al. The submental island flap in head and neck reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36 (8) 716-720
  • 12 Amin AA, Sakkary MA, Khalil AA, Rifaat MA, Zayed SB. The submental flap for oral cavity reconstruction: extended indications and technical refinements. Head Neck Oncol 2011; 3: 51
  • 13 Onoda S, Azumi S, Miura Y, Kimata Y. Head and neck reconstruction by using extended pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (4) 300-304
  • 14 Wilkman T, Suominen S, Back L, Vuola J, Lassus P. The pedicled latissimus dorsi flap in head and neck reconstruction: an old method revisited. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (3) 163-170
  • 15 Kowalski LP, Alcantara PS, Magrin J, Parise Júnior O. A case-control study on complications and survival in elderly patients undergoing major head and neck surgery. Am J Surg 1994; 168 (5) 485-490
  • 16 Zabrodsky M, Calabrese L, Tosoni A , et al. Major surgery in elderly head and neck cancer patients: immediate and long-term surgical results and complication rates. Surg Oncol 2004; 13 (4) 249-255
  • 17 Faltaous AA, Yetman RJ. The submental artery flap: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97 (1) 56-60 , discussion 61–62
  • 18 Lee JC, Lai WS, Kao CH, Hsu CH, Chu YH, Lin YS. Multiple-parameter evaluation demonstrates low donor-site morbidity after submental flap harvesting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 71 (10) 1800-1808
  • 19 Shi CL, Wang XC. Reconstruction of lower face defect or deformity with submental artery perforator flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69 (1) 41-44