Download PDF
Int J Angiol 2016; 25(01): 014-019
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1558465
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Brachial Artery–Brachial Vein Fistula for Hemodialysis: One- or Two-Stage Procedure—A Review

T. Kotsis
1   Vascular Unit, 2nd Department of Surgery, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece
,
K. G. Moulakakis
2   Department of Vascular Surgery, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece
,
S. N. Mylonas
1   Vascular Unit, 2nd Department of Surgery, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece
,
P. Kalogeropoulos
1   Vascular Unit, 2nd Department of Surgery, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece
,
A. Dellis
1   Vascular Unit, 2nd Department of Surgery, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece
,
S. Vasdekis
2   Department of Vascular Surgery, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 August 2015 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of the study was to investigate the patency rate of the brachial vein transposition–arteriovenous fistula [BVT–AVF] and to review the available literature regarding the comparison of the one-stage with the two-stage procedure.

Methods A multiple electronic health database search was performed, aiming to identify studies on brachial vein superficialization. Case reports and series with five or less patients were excluded from the study. End points of the study were the patency rates at 12, 24, and 36 months of follow-up. The patency of the one- or two-stage BVT–AVF procedure was investigated.

Results Overall, 380 BVT–AVFs were analyzed. The primary patency rate at 12 months ranged between 24 and 77%. Rate of early fistula malfunction or failure of maturation of the fistula resulting in loss of functionality ranged from 0 to 53%. Forearm edema, hematomas, wound infection, and early thrombosis were among the most common complications. Limited data were available for the comparison of patency rates between the one- and the two-stage procedure because of the absence of sufficient comparative studies. However, series with one-stage procedure presented a lower patency rate at 12 months compared to series with two stages.

Conclusion Patency rates after BVT–AVF, although not excellent, has encouraging results taking into account that patients undergoing these procedures do not have an accessible superficial vein network; failure of maturation and the increased rate of early postoperative complications remain a concern. The BVT–AVF is a valuable option for creating an autologous vascular access in patients lacking adequate superficial veins.

Keywords

brachial vein - transposition - chronic renal failure - arteriovenous fistula - one-/two-stage procedure - grafts
 

  • References

  • 1 Koontz Jr PG, Helling TS. Subcutaneous brachial vein arteriovenous fistula for chronic hemodialysis. World J Surg 1983; 7 (5) 672-674
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Jennings WC, Sideman MJ, Taubman KE, Broughan TA. Brachial vein transposition arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg 2009; 50 (5) 1121-1125 , discussion 1125–1126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Sidawy AN, Gray R, Besarab A , et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35 (3) 603-610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Angle N, Chandra A. The two-stage brachial artery-brachial vein autogenous fistula for hemodialysis: an alternative autogenous option for hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42 (4) 806-810
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Elwakeel HA, Saad EM, Elkiran YM, Awad I. Unusual vascular access for hemodialysis: transposed venae comitante of the brachial artery. Ann Vasc Surg 2007; 21 (5) 560-563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Srinivasaiah N, Yalamuri RR, Umez-Eronini NO, Rix D, Talbot D. Venae comitantes fistulae: an option in patients with difficult hemodialysis access. J Vasc Access 2007; 8 (4) 258-261
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Casey K, Tonnessen BH, Mannava K, Noll R, Money SR, Sternbergh III WC. Brachial versus basilic vein dialysis fistulas: a comparison of maturation and patency rates. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47 (2) 402-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Greenberg JI, May S, Suliman A, Angle N. The brachial artery-brachial vein fistula: expanding the possibilities for autogenous fistulae. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48 (5) 1245-1250 , 1250.e1–1250.e2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Pantea S, Viscu S, Pantea C, Luchian G, Papurica M, Bordos D. Brachial vein superficialization: a special method of vascular access for hemodialysis. Timisoara Med J 2008; 58: 149-154
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Torina PJ, Westheimer EF, Schanzer HR. Brachial vein transposition arteriovenous fistula: is it an acceptable option for chronic dialysis vascular access?. J Vasc Access 2008; 9 (1) 39-44
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lioupis C, Mistry H, Chandak P, Tyrrell M, Valenti D. Autogenous brachial-brachial fistula for vein access. Haemodynamic factors predicting outcome and 1 year clinical data. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; 38 (6) 770-776
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Dorobantu LF, Stiru O, Iliescu VA, Novelli E. The brachio-brachial arteriovenous fistula: a new method in patients without a superficial venous system in the upper limb. J Vasc Access 2006; 7 (2) 87-89
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Morale W, Patanè D, Incardona C , et al. Venae comitantes as a potential vascular resource to create native arteriovenous fistulae. J Vasc Access 2011; 12 (3) 211-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Urayama H. Clinical Study of Brachial Vein Transposition Fistulas for Hemodialysis. Japan J Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 41: 67-69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar